Gangavaram Musali Reddy v. The State of Andhra Pradesh
WP/26903/2022 · 2025-11-16
Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa
Original Suitbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 57027 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 57027 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010436982022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION No: 26903/2022 Between:
GANGAVARAM MUSALI REDDY, S/O (LATE) G. GANGIREDDY AGED 78 YRS, OCC EXSERVICE MEN AGRICULTURAL, D.N0.2181 HOUSING BOARD COLONY GANDHINAGAR, KADAPA, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY(HOME) SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI.
2. THE SUPEINTENDANT OF POLICE DISTRICT POLICE OFFICE, KADAPA YSR KADAPA DISTRICT.
3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER PENDIMARRI POLICE STATION, , PENDIMARRI YSR KADAPA DISTRICT.
4. CHINTALAPALLI BASIREDDY, S/O CHINNA GANGIREDDY AGED 70 YRS, BALAIHGARIPALLLI, PENDLIMARRI MANDAL ARAVINDA NAGAR, KADAPA.
...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. R SIVA SAI SWARUP Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME
2. G RAMESH BABU The Court made the following:
ORDER:
This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for:
“.... to issue a writ, order or a direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondent Police particularly the 2nd and 3rd Respondents not
2
providing any Police Assistance /Police Aid for effective implementation of the Court decree as passed in favour of the Petitioner in O.S.No.359/1997 dt 27-09-2001 as confirmed by the Appellate Court in A.S.No.102/2001 by granting a Permanent Injunction in connection with the Agricultural property land in an extent of Act-84 cents Pendlimarri Mandal, Gondipalli village, YSR Kadapa Distirct all are illegal, unlawful , violation of principles of natural justice, violation of Article 14, 21, 300-A- of the Constitution of India Consequently to direct the respondents 2 and 3 to provide a Police Aid infavour of the petitioner in connection with the petitioner smoothful enjoyment of the property without disturbance from the un-official respondent in the interest of the justice.”
2. Heard Sri R.Siva Sai Swaroop, learned counsel for the Petitioner and Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home.
3.
Learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that the suit filed by the Petitioner in O.S.No.359 of 1997 on the file of the Court of III Additional Junior Civil Judge, Kadapa was decreed granting permanent injunction in favour of the Petitioner herein and the same was confirmed in A.S.No.102 of 2001 on the file of the Court of III Additional District Judge, Kadapa. Learned counsel would further submit that, in view of the same, police protection may be granted to the Petitioner for the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the subject property.
4. Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit that the Court may pass appropriate orders.
5. Considering the submissions made and upon perusal of the material on record, it is evident that the decree of permanent injunction has been granted in favour of the Petitioner in O.S.No.359 of 1997 on the file of the Court of III Additional Junior Civil Judge, Kadapa and the same was confirmed in
3
A.S.No.102 of 2001 on the file of the Court of III Additional District Judge, Kadapa. The petitioner, who is in possession of the property, seeks protection for his peaceful possession and enjoyment of the subject property.
6. In that view, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the Petitioner is at liberty to make such a representation as and when required. So long as the
judgment and decree passed by the Civil Court remain in force, the Respondent-Police are directed to look into the grievance of the Petitioner and attend their cause in accordance with law. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:17.11.2025 Dinesh
4
HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
W.P.No.26903 of 2022
Dt.17.11.2025
Dinesh