Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:30151 WP No. 24708 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE K.MANMADHA RAO WRIT PETITION NO. 24708 OF 2022 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN:
1.
SMT SHANAZ W/O SHOUKATH AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS
2.
SMT NARASAMMA W/O RAMKRISHNAPPA AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS
3.
SRI ALLABAKASH S/O MOHAMMED MASOOD AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS
4.
SMT GULNAZ W/O MOHAMMED SHAMMUN AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS
5.
SMT NAZEEMA W/O MOHAMMED SHAMMUN AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS PLAINTIFF NO.1 TO 5 ARE R/A SY NO.39/1 NAGADEVANAHALLI VILLAGE GNYANABHARATHI LAYOUT KENGERI BANGALORE-560060 …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. NAVEED AHMED., ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:30151 WP No. 24708 of 2022 AND:
1.
SRI PATLIAH S/O LATE NARAYANAPPA AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS
2.
SRI SIDARAJU S/O T VENKATESH AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS
3.
SRI MUTHURAJU S/O T VENKATESH AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS
4.
SMT MUNIRATHANA D/O T VENKATESH AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS RESPONDENTS NO.1 TO 4 ARE R/AT BEHIND ATTI MAHALAKSHMI TEMPLE SHIVANA PALYA NAGADEVANHALLI VILLAGE KENGERI POST BANGALORE-560060
5.
SRI LIYAKATH KHAN S/O FAKRULLA KHAN AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS R/AT SY NO.39/1 NAGADEVANHALLI VILLAGE GNYNABHARATHI LAYOUT KENGERI, BANGALORE-560060 …RESPONDENTS
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED
ORDER DATED 09.11.2022 PASSED ON I.A. NO. 2/2022 IN OS NO. 5538/2021 ON THE FILE OF XIX ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE AT BENGALURU PRODUCED HEREIN AT ANNEXURE-A, CONSEQUENTLY, ALLOW THE APPLICATION AT ANNEXURE-C.
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:30151 WP No. 24708 of 2022
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM:
HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE K.MANMADHA RAO ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel Sri.Naveed Ahmed, appearing for the petitioners submits that this petition is filed seeking to set aside the impugned order passed on I.A.No.2/2022 in O.S.No.5538/2021 on the file of XIX Addl.City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru (CCH-18). Now, suit itself was dismissed on 06.03.2025 and in view of the dismissal of the suit, nothing survives for consideration in this writ petition. Hence, he prayed for dismissal of this writ petition as withdrawn.
2. The memo is placed on record.
3. In view of the memo, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (DR.K.MANMADHA RAO) JUDGE GSR, List No.: 1 Sl No.: 23