Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 57023 (AP)

SiIla Yellamma, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/7952/2020 · 2025-04-30

T C D Sekhar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR WRIT PETITION NO: 7952 OF 2020 Between: Smt. Silla Yellamma, W/o Silla Appa Rao, aged about 75 Agriculture, R/o Parvathipuram Village, Pedamadiga veedhi, Vizianagram District years Occ.- ...Petitioner AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by its Princi'^'^ Department A P Secretariat Velagapudi Guntur District 2. The District Collector, Vizainagaram District 3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Vizianagaram District 4. The Tahsildar, Parvathipuram mandal, Vizianagaram District ! Secretary Revenue yc. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to pass appropriate writ, order/s or direction more in the nature of a Writ of certiorari, to declare the proceedings dated 19-12- 2019 R.C. No. 296/2019/C issued by the 4 respondent in respect of an extent Ac 0 72 cents in Sy No 387-1/23 of Pavathipuram Village, parvathipuram Mandal, Vizianagaram District as illegal, arbitrary, unjust, and in violation of principles of Natural Justice, and consequently set aside the same. lA NO: 1 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of dispossession of the petitioner in respect of an extent Ac 0 72 cents in Sy No 387-1/23 of Pavathipuram Village, parvathipuram Mandal, Vizianagaram District in pursuance of proceedings notice dated 19-12-2019, issued by the 4^*^ Respondent. lA NO: 2 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may treat this as urgent and post this matter i.e W.P. of 2020 for hearing immediately in order to obtain interim orders. Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI. M/S BHASKARI ADVOCATES Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: APHC010132502020 !N THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3505] THURSDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR WRIT PETITION NO: 7952/2020 Between; Siila Yellamma ...PETITIONER AND The State of Andhra Pradesh and others ...RESPONDENT{S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.M/S BHASKARI ADVOCATES Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR REVENUE (AP) 2 TCDS.J W.P.No.7952of2020 The Court made the following order; It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is no more, and despite contacting the legal representatives of the petitioner, none have turned up. 2. In view of the same, the Writ Petition is dismissed as abated. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- A. VIJAYA BABU ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. One CC to SRI. M/S BHASKARI, Advocate [OPUC] 2. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE, High Court Of Andhra [OUT] 3. Three CD Copies Pradesh. ksr HIGH COURT DATED:01/05/2025 ORDER CP vv M m at- o m ^ Current Seciion ^ ■0' WP.No.7952 of 2020 DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS