APHC010239922019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] MONDAY,THE FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 10694/2019 Between: 1. DASARI MARIYABABU, S/O KANAKA SUNDARA RAO AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, AGRICULTUR, R/O VADLAMUDIVARIPALEM, ROMPICHERLA MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE RURAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT, GUNTUR. 3. THE SUBDIVISIONAL POLICE OFFICER, NARASARAOPET DIVISION, NARASARAOPET, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, ROMPICHERLA POLICE STATION, ROMPICHERLA, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 5. DASARI MARIYAKUMARI, W/O PEDA KOTESWARA RAO AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, HOUSE WIFE, R/O S.C. COLONY, ISSAPALEM VILLAGE, NARASARAOPET MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd and 4th respondents in interfering with civil disputes and calling the petitioner to the police station for settlement of the disputes in between the petitioner and the 5th respondent in pursuance of the legal notice dt.26-2-2019 without having jurisdiction is illegal, arbitrary and violative of principals of natural justice 2 IA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the 3rd and 4th respondents herein not to call the petitioner to the police station every day for settlement of the civil disputes in between the petitioner and the 5th respondent pending disposal of the above writ petition in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. G V S MEHAR KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No.10694 OF 2019 ORDER: Sri G.V.S. Mehar Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner, would submit that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for further adjudication, and the Writ Petition has become infructuous. 2. Sri R. Mallikarjuna Rao, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, is in attendance. 3. Recording the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 1st December, 2025 cbn 4 25 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No: 10694 OF 2019 1st December, 2025 cbn