Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 57013 (AP)

K LAKSHMI v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/30675/2023 · 2025-11-21

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010595622023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] SATURDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 30675/2023 Between: K LAKSHMI, W/O.VENKATACHALAM, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O.DIGUVATHADAKARA VILLAGE, THAVANAMPALLI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, A.P. SECRETARIAT AT VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, , CHITTOOR DISTRICT, CHITTOOR. 3. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, , THAVANAMPALLI POLICE STATION, THAVANAMPALLI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. S LAKSHMINARAYANA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not registering the FIR on the complaint of the petitioner dt.11.11.2023 having received same and disclosing the commission of cognizable offence is as illegal arbitrary and contrary to Section 154 of Cr.P.C., consequently direct the 3rd respondent to register the FIR on the complaint made by the petitioner dt.11.11.2023 and take further action.” 2 2. Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on written instructions, would submit that, based on the complaint given by the Petitioner, a case in Crime No.160 of 2023 for the offences under Sections 447, 427, 324 and 506 read with 34 IPC has been registered. 3. Sri S.Lakshminarayana Reddy, learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that, recording the same, the petition may be disposed of. 4. Considering the submissions made, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:22.11.2025 Dinesh 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.30675 of 2023 Dt.22.11.2025 Dinesh