Bharatha Chaitanya Yuvajana Party, v. The Government of Andhra Pradesh,
WP/21530/2024 · 2025-12-08
Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa
Writ Petition (Criminal)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 57012 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 57012 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010422662024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY,THE NINTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 21530/2024 Between:
1. BHARATHA CHAITANYA YUVAJANA PARTY,, REP BY ITS PRESIDENT, BODE RAMA CHANDRA YADAV, DOOR NO.11- 671, NH-16 SERVICE ROAD, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DIST, ANDHRA PRADESH - 522503
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOME A.P. STATE SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, A.P. POLICE HEADQUARTERS,
MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, TIRUPATHI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, TIRUMALA POLICE STATION, TIRUMALA, TIRUPATI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the Respondents specifically Resp Respondent No.4 to take cognizance of the petitioners complaint dated 23.09.2024 and follow the due process of law as laid down by the Honble Supreme Court of India in LalitaKumari vs Govt.Of U.P.and Ors in 1 WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) NO. 68 OF 2008 as any contrary would be violative of Honble Supreme Court of India judgment LalitaKumari vs Govt.Of U.P.and Ors in 1 WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) NO. 68 OF 2008 and pass
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. UMESH CHANDRA P V G Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME
2
The Court made the following:
ORDER:
This Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, has been filed, by the Petitioner for the following relief:
“ ... to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the Respondents specifically Respondent No.4 to take cognizance of the petitioners complaint dated 23.09.2024 and follow due process of law as laid down by the Honble Supreme Court of India in Lalita Kumari vs Govt. of U.P.and Ors in Writ Petition (Criminal) No.68 of 2008 as any contrary would be violative of Honble Supreme Court of India Judgment Lalita Kumari vs Govt. of U.P.and Ors in Writ Petition (Criminal) No.68 of 2008 and pass ...”
None represented for the Petitioner.
Learned Assistant Government Pleader placed on record written instructions and would submit that since Crime No.470 of 2024 has already been registered by respondent Police on the very same subject matter, no case is registered on the complaint given by the Petitioner and requested to dispose of the Writ Petition by passing appropriate orders. In that view, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/* 09.12.2025
3
HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
Writ Petition No. 21530 of 2024
09.12.2025
Mjl /*