Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 57010 (AP)

POTUGARI JAYAMMA v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

CRLP/1673/2024 · 2025-12-29

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010121472024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 1673/2024 Between: 1. POTUGARI JAYAMMA, W/O. LATE POTUGARI SRIRAMULU, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, OCC HOUSEWIFE, PRESENTLY RESIDING AT D. NO 11-162, TARAKARAMA NAGAR, SAIBABA TEMPLE STREET, PERURU PANCHAYAT, TIRUPATI RURAL MANDAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT - 517505. 2. BANDARI JHANSI,, W/O. BANDARI GUNASEKHAR, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEWIFE, R/O. D. NO 11-162, TARAKARAMA NAGAR, SAIBABA TEMPLE STREET, PERURU PANCHAYAT, TIRUPATI RURAL MANDAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT - 517505. 3. BANDARI GUNASEKHAR,, S/O. BANDARI SUGUNAKAR, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, OCC. CONTRACT LECTURER, R/O. D. NO 11-162, TARAKARAMA NAGAR, SAIBABA TEMPLE STREET, PERURU PANCHAYAT, TIRUPATI RURAL MANDAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT - 517505. ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P. 2. POTUGARI PADMAJA, W/O. GIRIBABU, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, D/O. NALISETTY SRINIVASULU, ANUMASAMUDRAM VILLAGE AND POST, A. S. PETA MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE 2 DISTRICT - 524304. ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner/accused(S): 1. S VARADARAJULU CHETTY Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S): 1. SIVAPRASAD REDDY VENATI 2. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) The Court made the following ORDER: The instant petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., has been filed by the Petitioners/A2 to A4, seeking quashment of proceedings against them in C.C.No.137 of 2023 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Atmakur. 2. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that no cause survives for adjudication in the Criminal Petition and the matter has become infructuous. 3. Recording the said submissions, the Criminal Petition is dismissed as infructuous. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. __________________________________ Dr.VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA, J Date: 30.12.2025 ASR 3 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Crl.P.No.1673 of 2024 Dt.30.12.2025 ASR