HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Anticipatory Bail Application No. 420 of 2025 Alauddin ...Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand ….Respondent Present:- Mr. Mohd. Safdar, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. V.S. Rawat, A.G.A. for the State. Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral) Applicant seeks anticipatory bail in Case Crime No. 759 of 2024, under Sections 3/5/11 of the Uttarakhand Protection of Cow Progeny Act, 2007, Police Station Kotwali Roorkee, District Haridwar. He is a child-in-conflict with law. 2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 3. The applicant is a child-in-conflict with law. Therefore, in view of the judgment passed by this Court in the case of Rashid Rao v. State of Uttarakhand, 2022 SCC OnLine Utt 481, the anticipatory bail application is not maintainable. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application deserves to be rejected. 2 4. The anticipatory bail application is rejected. (Ravindra Maithani, J.) 28.04.2025 Ravi Bisht