Research › Search › Judgment
Bombay High Court · body
2025 DAILYLAW 56996 (BOM)
GAJANAN S/O. HARIBHAU SADAR v. SHRI. B. R. KHARAT, EDUCATION OFFICER (PRIMARY), ZILLA PARISHAD, BULDHANA
/50/2025 · 2025-04-03
Shri Nitin W Sambre, Vrushali V Joshi
Contempt Petitionbody2025
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 56996 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 56996 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 2.cp.50.25 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 50/2025 IN WRIT PETITION NO.5772/2023(D) Gajanan s/o. Haribhau Sadar Vs. Shri B. R. Kharat - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mr. A. G. Ambetkar, Advocate for Petitioner.
CORAM :
NITIN W. SAMBRE AND MRS.VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, JJ.
DATED : 03/04/2025.
1. Not on board. On mentioning taken on board.
2. Since the learned Counsel for the petitioner states that the contempt is purged, the contempt petition is
disposed of.
3. Since the petitioner himself is satisfied as regards compliance of the order of which the contempt is alleged, we permit the petitioner to withdraw the contempt petition and as such, it stands disposed of.
(MRS. VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, J.) (NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.) RGurnule 2025:BHC-NAG:3487-DB