- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:27258 WP No. 5798 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM WRIT PETITION NO. 5798 OF 2025 (LB-BMP) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. SUVARNA V. W/O. S. SOMASHEKAR AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS R/AT 710/B, 5TH MAIN, 10TH CROSS VINAYAKA NAGAR, KONENA AGRAHARA BENGALURU - 560 017. 2. SRI S. NAGARAJA @ NAGARAJ REDDY S/O. LATE S. A. SAMPANGI REDDY AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS R/AT SORAHUNSE VILLAGE, VARTHUR HOBLI BENGALURU EAST TALUK BENGALURU URBAN - 560 087. 3. SRI S. K. JANARDHANA REDDY S/O. LATE KRISHNA REDDY AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS 4. SMT. R. RENUKA W/O. S. K. JANARDHANA REDDY AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS 5. KUMARI HEMASHREE J. D/O. S. K. JANARDHANA REDDY AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS 6. SRI HEMA CHANDR S. J. S/O. S. K. JANARDHANA REDDY AGED ABOUT 21 YEARS Digitally signed by NAGARAJA B M Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:27258 WP No. 5798 of 2025 7. SMT. RATHNAMMA W/O. S. HANUMANTHAPPA AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS PETITIONER NOS.3 TO 7 ARE RESIDING AT NO.27/1 NEAR MARAMMA TEMPLE SORAHUNSE VILLAGE, VARTHUR HOBLI BENGALURU EAST TALUK BENGALURU - 560 087. 8. SRI M. G. NATARAJ S/O. GOPAL SWAMY AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS R/AT NO.78(V), 4TH CROSS PAI LAYOUT, OPP. FOOD WORLD GODOWN HULIMAVU, B. G. ROAD, HULIMAVU BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK BENGALURU - 560 076 REPRESENTED BY HIS GPA HOLDER 9. M/S. MARKON HOMES OFFICE AT NO. 73, IST FLOOR, "KRISHNA" KARTHIK NAGAR, LRDE EMPLOYEES HOUSING CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LAYOUT DODDANEKUNDI VILLAGE KRISHNARAJAPURAM HOBLI BENGALURU - 560 037. A PARTNERSHIP FIRM REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING PARTNERS 9(1). SRI SRINIVASULU KONDAMURI S/O. SINGAIAH KONDAMURI AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS 9(2). SMT. SUMALATHA KONDAMURI W/O. SRINIVASULU KONDAMURI AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:27258 WP No. 5798 of 2025 BOTH ARE HAVING REGISTERED OFFICE SIT NO.73, 1ST FLOOR, "KRISHNA" KARTHIK NAGAR, LRDE EMPLOYEES HOUSING CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LAYOUT DODDANEKUNDI VILLAGE KRISHNARAJAPURAM HOBLI BENGALURU - 560 037. (REGISTRATION OF FIRM PARTNERSHIP ACT 1932 FIRM NO.SJN-F839-2022-23). …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. YASHAVANTHSWAMY A. M., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA THE URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 4TH FLOOR, VIKASA SOUDHA DR. B. R. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BENGALURU - 560 001 REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF PARLIAMENTARY AFFAIRS AND LEGISLATION VIKASA SOUDHA DR. B. R. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BENGALURU - 560 001 REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. 3. BRUHAT BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE N. R. SQUARE BENGALURU - 560 002. REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER. - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:27258 WP No. 5798 of 2025 4. THE JOINT DIRECTOR TOWN PLANNING NORTH- WARD-149) N. R. SQUARE, HEAD OFFICE BUILDING ANNEX BUILDING BRUHAT BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE BENGALURU - 560 002. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI BOPANNA B., A.G.A, FOR R1 AND R2; SRI K. B. MONESH KUMAR FOR R-3 AND R-4) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE KARNATAKA MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONS AND CERTAIN OTHER LAW (AMENDMENT) ACT 2021 ACT NO.1/2022 DATED 13/01/2022 ENACTED BY THE SECOND RESPONDENT PUBLISHED THROUGH NOTIFICATION BEARING NO. DPAL 50 SHASANA 2021 GAZETTE ON 13/01/2022 AT ANNEXURE-G DECLARING IT TO BE ULTRA VIRES AND UNCONSTITUTIONAL SO FAR AS PETITIONER IS CONCERNED AND ETC THIS WRIT PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN B-GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM - 5 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:27258 WP No. 5798 of 2025 ORAL ORDER The captioned petition is filed seeking the following reliefs: i) Issue a writ of certiorari or similar writ or order or direction to quash the Karnataka Municipal Corporations and Certain other law(amendment) act 2021 act No.1/2022 dated 13/01/2022 enacted by the second respondent published through notification bearing No. DPAL 50 SHASANA 2021 gazette on 13/01/2022 at ANNEXURE-G declaring it to be ultravires and unconstitutional. So for as petitioner is concerned. ii) Issue writ of certiorari or similar writ or order or direction to quash the office order bearing No. ADTP/PR/461/2021-22 dated 09/03/2022 issued by the third respondent at ANNEXURE-H. So for as petitioner is concerned. iii) Issue a writ of certiorari to quash the demand note L.P.No.BBMP/Addl.Dir/JDNORTH/0060/24-25 and project No.PRJ/5722/24-25 dated 19/02/2025 at ANNEXURE-D issued by the respondent No.4 in so far as demand towards. Fee payable to BBMP. So far as petitioner is concerned. Sl.No. Details of fees Amount (rs) 1 Scrutiny fee 1,03,068.00 2 Licence fee 20,61,354.00 3 Fee U/s 18(1) of KTCP act 1961 (Betterment fee) for building 4,58,079.00 4 Fee u/s 18(1) of KTCP Act 1961 (Betterment levy) for site 00.00 5 Security deposit 11,45,197.00 6 Lake Rejuvenation fee 00.00 - 6 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:27258 WP No. 5798 of 2025 7 1% of Labour cess amount to BBMP 55,140.00 8 Ground Rent (including 9% SGST) 12,16,199.00 9 Road cutting fee 0.00 10 Compound wall charges 10,000.00 11 Water Supply Cess 43,517.00 12 Ring Road Surcharge 43,517.00 13 Cess for Improvement of slums 21,759.00 14 MRTS Surcharge 2,17,587.00 15 5% of administrative charges to BBMP on cess and surcharge 17,178.00 16 Penalty 00.00 17 Miscellaneous charges 00.00 Total Rs 53,92,595.00 Previously paid amt 1,03,072.00 Total amount to be paid Rs. 53,89,523.00 to be paid to BBMP are concerned. And Labour cess total amount Rs. 54,58,836/- iv) Issue writ of Certiorari or similar writ, order or direction to quash the Circular bearing No.He. Ni.Ka.Pa.Ko/P.A/320/2020-21 dated 14/08/2020 at ANNEXURE-J issued by the 3rd Respondent. So for as petitioner is concerned. v) Issue a writ of Certiorari or similar writ or order or direction to quash provisions of section 18-A of Karnataka Town and Country Planning act, 1961 brought into effect by Karnataka act No.23 of 2004 by the 1st respondent at - 7 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:27258 WP No. 5798 of 2025 ANNEXURE-K in so far as 18-A (i) and) (iv) of Karnataka act No.23 of 2004 is concerned. So for as petitioner is concerned. vi) Grant an order, direction or writ in the nature of Certiorari quashing the notification issued by the 1st respondent bearing No.UDD 3TTP 2015 dated 25/2/2020 as contained in ANNEXURE-L in so far as the amended Rule 37-A and rule 37-C are concerned, So for as petitioner is concerned. vii) Issue any other appropriate writ or order or direction to the respondents demand fit in the circumstances of the case in the interest of justice and equity. viii) Pass any such other orders as this Hon'ble court deems fit in the facts and circumstances of the case in the interest justice and equity. 2. It is brought to the notice of this Court that across the Bar, the issue is dealt by the Co-ordinate Bench in the reported judgment in W.P.No.23086/2022 and connected matters. The Co-ordinate Bench, while deciding the issue, has set-aside the Karnataka Municipal Corporations and Certain Other Law (Amendment) Act, 2021 (Karnataka Act No.01 of 2022) and the Karnataka Municipal Corporations and Certain Other Law (Amendment) Act, 2023, (Karnataka Act No.37 of 2024). Therefore, this Court deems it fit to cull out the operative portion of the order, which reads as under; - 8 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:27258 WP No. 5798 of 2025 "ORDER (i) The writ petitions are partly allowed. (ii) The Karnataka Municipal Corporations and Certain Other Law (Amendment) Act, 2021 (Karnataka Act No.01 of 2022), is hereby quashed and set aside. (iii) The Karnataka Municipal Corporations and Certain Other Law (Amendment) Act, 2023, (Karnataka Act No.37 of 2024), is hereby quashed and set aside. (iv) It is hereby declared that the provisions contained in Section 18-A of the Karnataka Town and Country Planning Act, 1961, read with Rules 37-A and 37-C of the Karnataka Planning Authority Rules, 1965, are applicable only in respect of ‘Development Plan’ containing the proposal for construction on plots measuring more than 20,000 square meters in extent and not in respect of plots measuring less than 20,000 square meters. (v) It is hereby declared that if fee has been earlier collected for change of land use or while approving a layout plan, fee shall not be collected for subsequent ‘Development Plan’ in terms of the ‘Note’ found below TABLE I of Rule 37-A of the Karnataka Planning Authority Rules, 1965. (vi) It is hereby declared that the linking of the fee leviable under Rule 37-A of the Karnataka Planning Authority Rules, 1965, to the ‘market value’ or ‘guidance value’ as determined under Section 45-B of - 9 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:27258 WP No. 5798 of 2025 the Karnataka Stamp Act, 1957, is illegal. However, liberty is reserved to the respondent-State Government and the BBMP to re-fix a standard after collecting empherical data. (vii) Consequently, all the impugned Circulars which seek to give effect to the Rules 37-A and 37-C of the Karnataka Planning Authority Rules, 1965, are hereby quashed and set aside. (viii) It is hereby declared that Clause 3.8 of the Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike Building Bye- laws, 2003, providing for ‘Ground Rent’, is illegal and are accordingly quashed and set aside. (ix) Consequently, all the impugned Demand Notices raised by the respondent-BBMP, in respect of the writ petitioners herein are also quashed and set aside. It would be advisable that the BBMP may come out with a scheme for ‘One Time Settlement’ and settle the levy and collect the fee generally acceptable to the citizens of Bengaluru. This would also augment the present situation." 3. In the present writ petition, the core issue raised stands substantially covered and decided by the authoritative pronouncement of the coordinate bench, wherein the writ petitions were partly allowed and several consequential reliefs were granted. The Hon’ble Court, in - 10 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:27258 WP No. 5798 of 2025 unequivocal terms, quashed and set aside the Karnataka Municipal Corporations and Certain Other Law (Amendment) Acts of 2021 and 2023 (Karnataka Act Nos.01 of 2022 and 37 of 2024 respectively). 4. The Court further declared that the provisions under Section 18-A of the Karnataka Town and Country Planning Act, 1961, read with Rules 37-A and 37-C of the Karnataka Planning Authority Rules, 1965, are applicable only to development proposals concerning plots exceeding 20,000 square meters, and not to smaller plots. Importantly, it was also held that if a fee has been previously collected for change of land use or approval of layout plan, no further fee shall be levied for subsequent development plans, in view of the explanatory 'Note' to Table I of Rule 37-A. 5. The Court declared illegal the linkage of such levies to market or guidance value under Section 45-B of the Karnataka Stamp Act, and consequently, quashed all - 11 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:27258 WP No. 5798 of 2025 Circulars and demand notices issued to give effect to such unlawful interpretations. Clause 3.8 of the BBMP Building Bye-laws, 2003, imposing 'Ground Rent', was also struck down. 6. In view of these comprehensive declarations and findings, it is submitted that the controversy raised in the present writ petition no longer survives for adjudication independently, as it is squarely covered by the binding judgment of the coordinate bench. In the light of the law laid down in the reported judgment substantially covering the issue, which is raised in the captioned writ petition, the writ petition is liable to be allowed strictly aligning to the operative portion of the said writ petition. 7. In view of the above, this Court passes the following; ORDER (i) The writ petition is allowed. (ii) The impugned demand notice dated 19.02.2025 issued by respondent No.4 as per Annexure-D is hereby set-aside. - 12 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:27258 WP No. 5798 of 2025 (iii) Respondent- BBMP hereby directed to issue fresh/modified plan as the case may be. (iv) Respondent- BBMP is hereby directed to forthwith process the petitioner's application seeking building license and sanction of the building plan, strictly in accordance with law. (v) It is made clear that the issuance of the building license and approval plan shall not be withheld merely on the ground that the BBMP is contemplating to file an appeal against the reported judgment. (vi) If the building license and sanction plan are issued, the same shall be subjected to the outcome of any appeal that may be filed by the BBMP against the judgment. Pending applications, if any, are also disposed off. SD/- (SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM) JUDGE HDK List No.: 2 Sl No.: 39