Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 56977 (PNJ)

PUNEET MANGLA v. PUNJABI UNIVERSITY PATIALA AND OTHERS

CWP/13804/2025 · 2025-05-14

Aman Chaudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN TH 130 Puneet Mangla Punjabi University Patiala CORAM: HON Present : AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) 1. directed to promote the petitioner (Civil), regarding which has been served upon the on instructions, prays that a direction may be given to the respondents decide the same in a time bound manner, to which learned State counsel has no objection. 2. merits of the case, this petition is hereby disposed of with a direction to the respondents to decide the period of 3 authorities would not address in a just, fair and reasonable manner. Upon IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Puneet Mangla Versus Punjabi University Patiala and others CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Mr. Navdeep Jain, Advocate for Mr. Sunny K. Singla, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Amit Singh Sethi, Advocate, for the respondents-University. AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) Learned counsel would contend that the respondents be directed to promote the petitioner to the post of Sub Divisional Engineer , regarding which a legal notice dated has been served upon them, which has yet not evoked any response. He, on instructions, prays that a direction may be given to the respondents decide the same in a time bound manner, to which learned State counsel has no objection. In view of the above and without commenting upon the merits of the case, this petition is hereby disposed of with a direction to the respondents to decide the legal notice dated 3 months, which this Court has no reason to believe the authorities would not address in a just, fair and reasonable manner. Upon E HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-13804-2025 (O & M) Date of decision: 14.05.2025 ....Petitioner ...Respondents BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY . Navdeep Jain, Advocate for Advocate, Mr. Amit Singh Sethi, Advocate, . Learned counsel would contend that the respondents be to the post of Sub Divisional Engineer a legal notice dated 27.11.2024, Annexure P-13, , which has yet not evoked any response. He, on instructions, prays that a direction may be given to the respondents to decide the same in a time bound manner, to which learned State counsel In view of the above and without commenting upon the merits of the case, this petition is hereby disposed of with a direction to legal notice dated 27.11.2024, within a months, which this Court has no reason to believe the authorities would not address in a just, fair and reasonable manner. Upon merits of the case, this petition is hereby disposed of with a direction to PARVEEN KUMAR 2025.05.14 17:20 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CWP-13804-2025 -2- doing so, after notice and hearing offered to him and if found entitled, grant the benefit forthwith. Needless to say, if the orders are adverse to his interest, the same shall contain reasons and the petitioner shall be free to seek legal redress thereupon. 14.05.2025 (AMAN CHAUDHARY) parveen kumar JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No PARVEEN KUMAR 2025.05.14 17:20 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.