Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 5697 (GAU)

SUREN CH. RAJA v. SMTI RUMI RAJA HAZARIKA and ANR

Crl.Rev.P./269/2011 · 2025-03-18

Kaushik Goswami

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010007062011 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Crl.Rev.P./269/2011 SUREN CH. RAJA S/O SRI NAREN RAJA R/O VILL- SRI JAJORI SHIMOLUTAL P.S. MIKIRBHETA, DIST. MORIGAON, ASSAM. VERSUS SMTI RUMI RAJA HAZARIKA and ANR W/O SRI SUREN RAJA D/O SRI BHOGESWAR HAZARIKA R/O VILL- KUJISATRA, P.S. MIKIRBHETA, DIST. MORIGAON, ASSAM. 2:THE STATE OF ASSA Advocate for the Petitioner : MS M BHATTACHARYA, MS.M MAHANTA,MR.A R MEDHI Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, MR. S BISWAS,MR. S BISWAS (LEGAL AID COUNSEL) BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI ORDER 19.03.2025 Ms. D. Devi, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Mr. S. Biswas, learned Legal Aid Counsel for the respondent No. 1 and Mr. M.B. Goswami, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor for the State respondent are present. Page No.# 2/2 It appears that this matter was listed today in the order column with the remark “For Dismissal”. As on the last occasion, i.e. 13.03.2025 also, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. In view of the consecutive no representation on behalf of the petitioner, despite the matter being listed in the cause list with the remark “For Dismissal”, the petition stands dismissed, for non-prosecution. JUDGE Comparing Assistant