Research › Search › Judgment
Bombay High Court · body
2025 DAILYLAW 56968 (BOM)
PRAKASH S/O MARUTI KAWALKAR v. THE UNION OF INDIA, THROUGH THE GENERAL MANAGER, CENTRAL RAILWAY, CST MUMBAI
CAF/3042/2024 · 2025-07-11
Shri Abhay J Mantri
body2025
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 56968 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 56968 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 25caf3042.2024..odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, NAGPUR BENCH, AT NAGPUR.
CIVIL APPLICATION (CAF) NO 3042 OF 2024 IN FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO. 25085 OF 2023 (Prakash s/o Maruti Kawalkar Vs. The Union of India) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mr. A.A. Pannase, Advocate for appellant/applicant. Ms. Neerja Choubey, Advocate for the respondent/Union of India.
CORAM : ABHAY J. MANTRI, J.
DATED : 11-07-2025
Heard.
2. The appellant/applicant has moved this application to condone the delay of 568 days caused in filing this appeal, for which, learned counsel for the respondent has no objection, in view of the same, and the reason stated in the application, the application is allowed.
3. The delay of 568 in filing the appeal is condoned. The appeal be registered accordingly.
FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO. 25085 OF 2024 Heard.
2. Issue notice to respondents, returnable after six weeks.
3. Ms. Choubey, learned counsel, waives notice for the respondent.
4. Call for record and proceedings.
(ABHAY J. MANTRI, J.) Belkhede