APHC010329102012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] SATURDAY,THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 38665/2012 Between: 1. CH.SUDHIRA BABU, S/O.CH.DEVADANAM,, OCC : A.E.CIVIL TLC, ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 2. M.DEVANANDAM, S/O. ADINARAYANA BOBJEE,, OCC : A.E.CIVIL, O & M, RAJAHMUNDRY, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 3. B.ISSAK SAMPATHI KUMAR, S/O. B.ANANDA RAO,, OCC : A.E.CIVIL 400 K.V. VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. TRANSMISSION CORPORATION OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS JOINT MANAGING DIRECTOR (HRD), A.P. TRANSCO, VIDYUT SOUDA, KHAIRATABAD, HYDERABAD. 2. M SATYAVATHI A E TECH, O/O. E.E. (CIVIL), MINT COMPOUND, KHAIRATABAD, HYDERABAD. 3. K TEJSWARA RAO A E /CIVIL, O/O. ASST. A.E., O & M, SUB DIVISION, A.P. TRANSCO, SANGA REDDY, MEDAK DISTRICT. 4. L SRINIVASA RAO A E /CIVIL, O/O. A.E.E./CIVIL/TECH., VIDYUT SOUDHA, HYDERABAD. 5. S MADHAVI A E /TECH, O/O. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER CIVIL/TECH., VIDYUT SOUDHA, HYDERABAD. 6. V MANOJ NAIDU A E /CIVIL, ASST. E.E., CIVIL/TLC SUB DIVISION, A.P. TRANSCO, TIRUPATI. (RESPONDENTS 2 TO 6 ARE IMPLEADED AS PER COURT ORDER DATED 19.02.2013 IN WPMP NO.2252 OF 2013)). ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more so, a writ in the nature of Mandamus by declaring the in action of the respondent in fixing the final seniority list of Asst. Engineer Civil by orders of the petitioners dated.09.08.2012 as arbitrary, illegal, unlawful and opposed to principle of natural justice, in-equitable and consequentially to direct the respondent to fix the seniority of the petitioners in TOO No.15. IA NO: 1 OF 2012(WPMP 49046 OF 2012 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent to consider the representation of the petitioners dated.24.09.2012 and pass orders during the pendency of the above writ petition IA NO: 1 OF 2013(WPMP 2252 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to implead the proposed parties as respondents 2 to 6 in the above writ petition and W.P.M.P. Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. G VASANTHA RAYUDU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. V V SATISH (SC for APEPDCL) The Court made the following: :: ORDER :: Since there was no representation on behalf of the petitioners on 31.10.2025 & 14.11.2025, the matter was directed to be listed today under the caption ‘for dismissal’. Page 3 of 4 Even today also there is no representation on behalf of the petitioners. It appears that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the writ petition. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. No order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI Date: 22.11.2025 TVN 67 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION No.38665 OF 2012 Date: 22.11.2025 TVN