M/S. BHARAT KUMAR SITANI, JHARSUGUDA v. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, CGST AND CENTRAL EXCISE, ROURKELA II DIVISION
WP(C)/25821/2025 · 2026-03-26
Harish Tandon Cj, Murahari Sri Raman
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 5696 (ORI) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 5696 (ORI) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No. 25821 of 2025
M/s. Bharat Kumar Sitani, Jharsuguda …. Petitioner Mr. Madhab Lal Agarwal, Advocate -versus- Assistant Commissioner, CGST & Central Excise, Rourkela II Division, Rourkela and another …. Opposite Parties Mr. Sujan Kumar Roy Choudhury, Senior Standing Counsel
CORAM:
HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE AND HON’BLE MR JUSTICE MURAHARI SRI RAMAN
Order No.
ORDER 26.03.2026
02.
1. Mr. Madhab Lal Agarwal, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, by filing a memo in the Court, submits that this writ petition contains fatal defects, which are incurable in nature. Thus, he seeks withdrawal of this writ petition with a liberty to file it afresh with better particulars. The said memo is taken on record.
2. Leave is granted.
3. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn with the liberty as prayed for.
(Harish Tandon)
Chief Justice
(M.S. Raman) Judge
Sisira