Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 56954 (AP)

PADARLA THIMOTHI/THRIMURTHY v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/19506/2023 · 2025-11-21

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010376102023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) SATURDAY,THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 19506 OF 2023 Between: 1. PADARLA THIMOTHI/THRIMURTHY, S/o kondaiah, Age about 56 years, Gottigundala village , Kondapuram mandalam, S.P.S.R. Nellore District ...Petitioner AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, rep.by its Principal Secretary Home Department, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Guntur District. 2. The Superintendent of Police, SPSR Nellore District. 3. The Deputu Superintendent of Police, Kavali Town, SPSR Nellore District. 4. The Station House Officer, Kondapuram Police Station, Kondapuram Mandal, SPSR Nellore District. 5. Yaramala Venkata Ramana Reddy, S/o. China Venkataiah, Aged about 40 years, Gottigundala village , Kondapuram mandalam S.P.S.R. Nellore District ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to pleased MANDAMUS declaring the action of the respondents 3 and 4 bringing pressure on the petitioner to come to compromise with the 5th un official respondent on complaint of the petitioner dated 5-12-2022 without registering the FIR as illegal, arbitrary and violation of Article 14, 19, 21 and 300A of the Constitution of India and against the principles of natural justice and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the 3rd and 4th respondents not to call the petitioner to the office of the 3rd respondent on the guise of compromise with regard to his complaint dated 5-12-2022 pending disposal of the main writ petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: DR G V RAVI Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following order: THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO:19506 OF 2023 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…pleased MANDAMUS declaring the action of the respondents 3 and 4 bringing pressure on the petitioner to come to compromise with the 5th un official respondent on complaint of the petitioner dated 5-12-2022 without registering the FIR as illegal, arbitrary and violation of Article 14, 19, 21 and 300A of the Constitution of India and against the principles of natural justice and to pass.…” 2. None represented for the petitioner(s). 3. When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents, on written instructions, would submit that since the subject matter in the present petition is civil in nature, the respondent police have not registered the crime on the complaint dated 05.12.2022 made by the petitioner. 4. Recording the above said submission, this Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the petitioner is at liberty to work out his remedies before the appropriate forum according to law. There shall be no Order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 22-11-2025 KKV HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.19506 of 2023 Dated.22-11-2025 KKV 129 HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH:: AMARAVATI MAIN CASE NO.: W.P.No.19506 of 2023 PROCEEDING SHEET Sl. No. Date ORDER OFFICE NOTE 22.11.2025 Dr.VJP,J The Writ Petition is disposed of. (vide separate order) ________ Dr.VJP,J KKV