Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 / 1 HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRA No. 687 of 2005 AAJU RAM versus STATE OF CHHATTISGARH
Order Sheet 04/11/2025 None for the appellant. Shri Kalpesh Ruparel, Panel Lawyer for the State. In the appeal Shri Manoj Jaiswal was appointed through High Court Legal Service Authority to prosecute the appeal on behalf of the appellant. However, he is not appearing in the case and therefore this court constrains to appoint another counsel from the Legal Services Authority and to hear the appeal finally. Shri Anand Gupta, Advocate, present in the court, and whose name is also reflected in the list of Legal Aid Counsel, he is requested to assist the court and to argue the case on behalf of appellant. The Chhattisgarh High Court Legal Services Authority is
directed to issue necessary authorization in favour of Shri Anand Gupta, Advocate, as the counsel for appellant. With the consent of the parties, the matter is heard finally.
Judgment dictated in open court. Signed and dated separately. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge inder