Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 56948 (KAR)

M P SURENDRA KUMAR v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/4931/2021 · 2025-08-22

M I Arun

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:32892 WP No. 4931 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF AUGUST, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN WRIT PETITION NO. 4931 OF 2021 (LB-RES) BETWEEN: 1. M.P. SURENDRA KUMAR AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, S/O LATE M.C. PUTTASWAMY SHOP NO.20, MANDI MARKET, MANDI MOHALLA, MYSORE-570001. 2. ABDUL AZEEZ AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, S/O LATE GULKAM DASTHAGIR SHOP NO.59, MANDI MARKET, MANDI MOHALLA, MYSORE-570001. 3. PARAMESHWARA C AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, S/O CHIKKAIAH SHOP NO.09, CORPORATION BUILDING, KALIDASA ROAD, V.V. MOHALLA MYSORE-570002. 4. SUNDAR RAO V AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS, S/O LATE L. VITAL ROAD, SHOP NO.17, MANDI MARKET, MANDI MOHALLA, MYSORE-570001. Digitally signed by GEETHA P G Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:32892 WP No. 4931 of 2021 5. GHOUSE SHARIFF AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS, S/O LATE GULAM DASTAGIR SHOP NO.60, MANDI MARKET, MANDI MOHALLA, MYSORE-570001. 6. NARASIMHA AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, S/O LATE CHELUVAIAH SHOP NO.03, MANDI MARKET MANDI MOHALLA MYSORE-570001. 7. H. SANJAY KUMAR AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, S/O LATE HARI RAM SHOP NO.04, CORPORATION BUILDING, KALIDAS ROAD, V.V. MOHALLA, MYSORE-570002. 8. HIRARAM K. MALI AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, S/O KAPUR RAM SHOP NO.17, CORPORATION BUILDILNG, KALIDASA ROAD, V.V. MOHALLA, MYSORE-570002. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. B.S. NAGARAJ, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY M.S. BUILDING, DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BENGALURU-560 001. 2. THE MYSURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE MYSURU CITY MYSURU-570 001 - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:32892 WP No. 4931 of 2021 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. H.K. KENCHEGOWDA, AGA FOR R1; SRI. HEMANTH P., ADVOCATE FOR SMT. GEETHADEVI M.P., ADVOCATE FOR R2) THIS PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE NOTICES DATED 20.11.2020 AND 21.01.2021 MADE IN REF NO.R8(2)PR/255/2020-21 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.2 - MYSURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE, COPIES AT ANNEXURE-A TO A7 RESPECTIVELY AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN ORAL ORDER 1. The writ petition is filed, challenging the notices issued by respondent no.2 calling upon the petitioners to vacate their shops. 2. The learned counsel for respondent No.2 upon instructions submits that the shops admittedly belong to respondent No.2 - the Mysuru Mahanagara Palike. However, the notices have been issued erroneously and hence, subsequently, the same have been withdrawn and appropriate proceedings under the Karnataka Public Premises (Eviction of - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:32892 WP No. 4931 of 2021 Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1974 have been initiated to have the petitioners evicted from the property. 3. It is seen that the writ petition pertains to issuance of impugned notices and nothing else. As the same has been withdrawn, the writ petition is hereby dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (M.I.ARUN) JUDGE VMB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 26