APHC010038642024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] FRIDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 2287/2024 Between: 1 . RAVURI KOTESWARA RAO, S/O. VEERACARY, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS GOLD SMITH, R/O. D.NO.1-2-9/20, BURAMPET, NARASARAO PET PALNADU DISTRICT 522 601 2 . G.V.L.KISHORE,, S/O LATE VENKATA SUBBAIAH. AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS ADVOCATE,PLOTNO42,FLATNO202,C.S.RESTATES,HUDACOMPLEX ,SAROORNAG AR,HYDERBAD,500035,TELANGANA STATE. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, PALNADU NARASARAOPET, PALNADU. DISTRICT. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, NARASARAOPET RURAL.. STATION,, PALNADU DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. N V R AMARNATH Counsel for the Respondent(S): 2 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) 3 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 2287 of 2024 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer: “…to issue an order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the 3rd Respondent in involving in civil matters and in summoning the petitioners and detained them in the Police Station for hours together and abusing them in filthy language and threatening them to implicate in false cases without there being any crime against the petitioners is illegal, arbitrary, unjust and unconstitutional and consequently direct the 3rd respondent not to involve in civil matters and summon the petitioners and detained them without there being any crime against the petitioner without following due process of law,.…” 2. Heard Sri N.V.R.Amarnath, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri V.Farook, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on written instructions, would submit that the respondent-police are not interfering in the civil disputes between the parties. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that recording the same, the petition may be disposed of. 5. Recording the above said submissions, this Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the police are directed not to interfere in the civil disputes between the parties, except under due process of law and not to call the petitioners to 4 the police station without there being any crime registered against them. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 05.12.2025. UPS 5 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.2287 of 2024 Dated.05.12.2025 UPS 268