APHC010602552023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] SATURDAY,THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 31007/2023 Between: 1. ANAPARTHI VEERANNA CHOWDARY, S/O. VENKATA RAO, AGED 56 YEARS, R/O. ROAD NO.4, BAPANNADORA COLONY RAMANAIAHPETA, KAKINADA RURAL KAKINADA DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP BY ITS PRL. SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KAKINADA DISTRICT AT KAKINADA 3. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, SARPAVARAM POLICE STATION, SARPAVARAM KAKINADA DISTRICT 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, SARPAVARAM POLICE STATION, SARPAVARAM KAKINADA DISTRICT 5. DR K SRIDEVI, W/O. NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, AGED MAJOR, C/O. NAGASURYA CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL, OPPOSITE VENKATARAMA THEATRE HOGH SCHOOL ROAD, AMALAPURAM 533 201 6. KANCHE SESHAGIRI RAO, S/O. NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, AGED MAJOR, R/O. ADITYA TOWERS, B-BLOCK, 7TH FLOOR, MITHILAPUR VUDA COLONY, MADURAWADA, VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents police in not taking action against the unofficial respondents 5 and 6 after receipt of the complaint dated 28.11.2023 and 31.01.2023 of the petitioner without registering any crime and without providing protection to the petitioner from the hands of the unofficial respondents 5 and 6 by the respondents police is illegal, arbitrary and against the principles of natural justice and also violative of Articles 14, 19, 21 and 300-A of Constitution of India and also violation of apex court rulings held in Lalitha Kumari Vs. Govt. of UP and 2 ors and as well as Cr.P.0 consequently direct the respondents police to take action against the unofficial respondents 5 and 6 by registering a crime basing on the complaints dated 28.11.2023 and 31.01.2023 of the petitioner by giving protection to the petitioner in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. PAMARTHI KAMESWARA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2. V SESHA KUMARI 3 The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, has been filed, by the Petitioner for the following relief: “ ... to issue a Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents police in not taking action against the unofficial respondents 5 and 6 after receipt of the complaint dated 28.11.2023 and 31.01.2023 of the petitioner without registering any crime and without providing protection to the petitioner from the hands of the unofficial respondents 5 and 6 by the respondents police is illegal, arbitrary and against the principles of natural justice and also violative of Articles 14, 19, 21 and 300-A of Constitution of India and also violation of apex court rulings held in Lalitha Kumari Vs. Govt. of UP and ors and as well as Cr.P.0 consequently direct the respondents police to take action against the unofficial respondents 5 and 6 by registering a crime basing on the complaints dated 28.11.2023 and 31.01.2023 of the petitioner by giving protection to the petitioner in the interest of justice. ...” Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home representing for respondent State. Perused the material on record. Learned Assistant Government Pleader placed on record, the written instructions and would submit that Petitioner came to the Police Station and lodged a report, which is entered into the reception registered and issued receipt No.41 of 2023 dated 01.02.203, during enquiry, it revealed that the contents are „civil in nature‟ and informed the same to the Petitioner and requested to dispose of the Writ Petition by passing appropriate orders. Learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that recording the said submission, this Writ Petition may be disposed of. 4 In that view, this Writ Petition is disposed of. Petitioner is at liberty to work out the remedy before appropriate forum according to law. No order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/* Dinesh 5 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Writ Petition No. 31007 of 2023 22.11.2025 Mjl /* Dinesh