IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH::AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 38688 OF 2015 Between: Kalidindi Krishnam Raju, S/o Ramchander Raju, Aged about 58 years, Occ; Aqua-culture R/o H.No.7-146, Cherkuvada Village Akividu Mandal, West Godavari District. Smt. Kalidindi Swarajalaxmi, W/o Krishnam Raju, Aged about 55 years, Occ: Aqua-culture R/o H.No.7-146, Cherkuvada Village Akividu Mandal, West Godavari District. 1. 2. ...Petitioners AND 1. The Superintending Engineer APEPDCL, Eluru West Godavari District. 2. The Assistant Engineer (Of)erations) 33/11 KV, Vidyuth Sub-Station Undi, West Godavari District. 3. Penumacha Suryabhagwan Raju, S/o Hemadri Raju, Aged about 58 years, Occ: Aqua-Culture, R/o 3-86, Cherukuvada village Akividu Mandal, West Godavari District. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS to declaring the action of the respondent No.2 herein in proposing to erect electric poles in the petitioner’s land situated in Survey Nos.414, 417/1A and 414/2 respectively situated in Cherukuvada Village, Akividu Mandal, West Godavari District to erect the electric wires through the petitioner's lands by cutting the coconut trees in the petitioner's land to provide electricity to the Aqua-tanks of the 3rd > # respondent herein is illegal, arbitrary and against the terms and conditions of Supply, Principles of natural justice and violation of Article 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent No.2 not to erect any electric poles through the petitioners lands, as well as not to cut the coconut trees over the said lands j.A. NO: 1 OF 2015rWPMP. NO: 49800 OF 2015) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased direct the respondent No.2 not to lay the electric poles through petitioners land, as well as not to cut the lands, situated in Survey Nos.414‘, 417/ 1A and 414/2 m Cherukuvada Village, Akividu Mandal, West Godavari District disposal of the above Writ Petition Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI B CHANDRA SHEKHAR “'S ISWARYA REPRESENTING OKI M RAVINDRA The Court made the following: .Order the coconut trees over the said respectively situated pending .. i ■ ^ APHC010211142015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] THURSDAY .THE FIRST DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 38688/2015 Between: \ Kalidindi'Krishnam Raju and Others ...PETITIONER(S) AND The Superintending Engineer Apepdcl and Others Counsel for the Petitioner(S): ...RESPONDENT(S) 1.B CHANDRA SHEKHAR Counsel for the Respondent{S): 1. VV SATISH (SC for APEPDCL) The Court made the following: :: ORDER :: The above writ petition is filed to declare respondent No. 2's proposal to erect electric poles on the petitioners' land in Sy.Nos.414, 417/1A and 414/2 of Cherukuvada Village, Akividu Mandal, West Godavari District, is illegal and arbitrary. 2. Heard Sri B. Chandra Sekhar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Ms. Iswarya, learned Junior Standing Counsel, appeared for respondents 1 & 2. 3 On 27.11.2015, an interim order was granted Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that poles were laid in different lands and by efflux of time, the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication, and the writ petition has become infructuous. 5. Given the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, in this case, shall stand closed. 4. the A n Sd/- G HELA NAIDU ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// ' SECTION OFFICER •cr To / 1. One CC to SRI B CHANDRA SHEKHAR Advocate [OPUC] i^WARYA, Learned Junior Standing Counsel for 2. One CC to M/S. I' APEPDCL [OPUC] 3. Three CD Copies gsg HIGH COURT DATED: 01/05/2025 ORDER 5 23 SEP 2025 ^ . Current section . WP.No.38688 of 2015 mli .60, DISMISSING THE WP AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS