Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:HHC:16604 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWP No. 875 of 2025. Decided on : 29.05.2025 Jitender Kumar and others. …Petitioners Versus National Highway Authority of India and others. …Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioners : Mr. Dinkar Bhaskar, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. K.D. Shreedhar, Senior Advocate, with Ms. Shreya Chauhan, Advocate, for respondents No.1 to 3. Mr. Virbahadur Verma, Central Government Counsel, for respondents No.4. Mr. Rajpal Thakur, Additional Advocate General, for respondents No.5. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) When this case was taken up for consideration today, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that as per his instructions, now the petitioner has been paid qua the structures acquired in the course of the construction of 1Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2 2025:HHC:16604 National Highway.
2. In light of this development, these proceedings are closed. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of accordingly.
(Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge
May 29, 2025 (Shivank Thakur)