1 2025:CGHC:42570 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WP227 No. 481 of 2021 1 - Muslim Zamat Through Ramiz Raja, Aged About 32 Years, S/o Shaukat Ali, R/o Hikmi Para, Dalpat Sagar Ward, Jagdalpur (Chhattisgarh) 2 - Abdul Razzak Aged About 46 Years S/o Abdul Hafiz, R/o Veer Sawarkar Ward, Pathraguda, Jagdalpur (Chhattisgarh) 3 - Abdul Shareef S/o Abdul Aziz Aged About 48 Years R/o Main Road, Mahaveer Chowk, Jagdalpur (Chhattisgarh) ... Petitioners Versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Ministry Of Minorities Welfare / Wakf, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Capital Complex, Naya Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Chhattisgarh State Wakf Board Raipur Through Its Chief Executive Officer Ghadi Chowk, Raipur Chhattisgarh. 3 - Mushtaq Ahmad Khan S/o Shamsher Khan, Thakur Road, Sadar Ward, Jagdalpur (Chhattisgarh) ... Respondents For Petitioners : Mr. Krishna Tandon, Advocate holding the brief of Mr. Varun Sharma, Advocate For Respondent No.1/State For Respondent No. 2 : : Mr. Pramod Shrivastava, Deputy Government Advocate Mr. Anoop Majumdar, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 21/08/2025 1. The petitioners have filed this petition seeking the following relief(s):- 10.i To kindly call for the records of the case from the respondents. Digitally signed by RAMESH KUMAR VATTI Date: 2025.08.27 16:58:00 +0530 2 10.ii To kindly direct the Waqf Board to initiate proceedings under Section 52 of the Waqf Act, 1995 in consequence of the order dated 24/12/2020 (Annexure P/1) 10.iii To kindly quash the proceedings initiated before the learned Waqf Tribunal vide Case no. 4A/2021. (Annexure P/2). 10.iv To kindly make any other order that may be deemed fit and just in the facts and circumstances of the case including awarding of the costs to the petitioner. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners may be permitted to make legal submission before the learned Tribunal. 3. No objection from other side. 4. Permission granted. 5. The petitioners would be at liberty to raise all available defence before the learned Tribunal. 6. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge vatti