- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:4676 WP No. 81047 of 2013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 81047 OF 2013 (LA-RES) BETWEEN: SMT. ARUNDHATI W/O. MANOHAR KORI, AGE: MAJOR, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O. LAKMANAHALLI, TQ AND DIST: DHARWAD. …PETITIONER [ABSENT] AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REVENUE DEPARTMENT (LAND ACQUISITION), REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINICPAL SECRETARY, VIDHANSOUDHA, BANGALORE. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, DHARWAD, D.C.COMPOUND, DHARWAD. 3. THE ASST. COMMISSIONER AND THE SPL.LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, DHARWAD SUB-DIVISION, DHARWAD. 4. THE KARNATAKA HOUSING BOARD, HUBLI, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN, HUBLI. 5. THE KARNATAKA RAJYA BANAJIGA SAMAJADA KSHEMABHIBRUDHI SANGHA ®, BANGALORE, KENDRIYA KACHIERI, Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:4676 WP No. 81047 of 2013 VARKAR ONI, KOPPAL-583 231. REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT. 6. THE COMMISSIONER, KARNATAKA HOUSING BOARD, 1ST, 3RD AND 4TH FLOOR, CAUVERY BHAVAN, K.G.ROAD, GANDHINAGAR, BENGALURU-560 009. 7. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, KARNATAKA HOUSING BOARD, HUBBALLI DIVISION, HUBBALLI. 8. THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, KARNATAKA HOUSING BOARD, HUBBALLI SUB-DIVISION, HUBBALLI. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. KIRTILATA.R.PATIL., HCGP FOR R1-3; SMT. SHARMILA.M.PATIL., ADVOCATE FOR R4 & R7-8; SRI. RAJASHEKHAR.R.GUNJALLI., ADVOCATE FOR R5; SRI. A.P.KAMOJI., ADVOCATE FOR R6) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER The petition is listed today for Preliminary Hearing B- Group and the name of the petitioner is printed/ shown in the cause list. The name of the petitioner is called out thrice in the open Court, there is no representation on behalf of the - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:4676 WP No. 81047 of 2013 petitioner, either personally or through video conferencing. The petitioner is absent. As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the petition was listed on 06.03.2025, on that day, counsel Smt.Surabhi Kulkarni., was permitted to retire from the case and the office was directed to print the name of the petitioner in the cause list and it was also ordered to be listed on 12.03.2025. Accordingly, the petition is listed today by printing the name of the petitioner in the cause list. As could be seen from the writ papers, the petition is filed in 2013. Now we are in the month of March 2025. The petition is pending from twelve years. As already noted above, the name of the petitioner is called out thrice in the open Court, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner, either personally or through video conferencing. The petitioner has not engaged counsel to represent her in the Court. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE MRP List No.: 2 Sl No.: 44