DEEPAK KUMAR v. PAWAN KOTWAL,SECY.ORRIGATION AND ORS.
CPSW/593/2014 · 2025-07-02
Ma Chowdhary
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 5693 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 5693 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
CPSW No. 593/2014
Deepak Kumar
…..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through: None.
vs
Pawan Kotwal & Ors. .…. Respondent(s)
Through: Ms. Priyanka Bhat, Advocate vice Ms. Monika Kohli, Sr. AAG.
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M. A. CHOWDHARY, JUDGE
ORDER (02.07.2025)
There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. So was the case on the last date of hearing. It seems that the grievance of the petitioner stands redressed by implementation of the judgment by the respondents.
Be that as it may, the petition is disposed of and the contempt proceedings are dropped, however, the petitioners shall be at liberty to seek revival of the matter, if cause survives.
(M. A. CHOWDHARY)
JUDGE
Jammu 02.07.2025 Neha-1
Serial No. 17 Neha Kumari I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Jammu 03.07.2025 15:05