Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 56914 (KAR)

THE MANAGEMENT OF SHELL INDIA MARKETS PVT LTD v. SRI VIJAYA SARATHY JAYANTHI

WP/10458/2022 · 2025-12-09

Jyoti M

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:51858 WP No. 10458 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M WRIT PETITION NO. 10458 OF 2022 (L-RES) BETWEEN: 1. THE MANAGEMENT OF SHELL INDIA MARKETS PVT. LTD., REGISTERED UNDER KARNATAKA SHOPS AND COMMERCIAL ESTABLISHMENTS ACT, 1961 REPRESENTED BY ER/IR MANAGER/ AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY MR. KALYAN MALNEEDI, HAVING OFFICE PRESENTLY AT, PLOT NO.7, BENGALURU HARDWARE PARK, KIADB INDUSTRIAL PARK, MAHADEVA KODIGEHALLI, BENGALURU- 562 149. EARLIER HAVING OFFICE AT: SHELL TECHNOLOGY CENTRE BENGALURU RMX CENTENNIAL CAMPUS B, NO.8B, KUNDALAHALLI MAIN ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 048. 2. SHELL INDIA MARKETS PVT. LTD., REGISTERED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956, REPRESENTED BY ER/IT MANAGER/ AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY MR. KALYAN MALNEEDI, HAVING REGISTERED OFFICE AT, 2ND FLOOR, CAMPUS 4A, RMZ MILLNIA BUSINESS PARK, Digitally signed by THEJAS KUMAR N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:51858 WP No. 10458 of 2022 143, DR M.G.R. ROAD, PERUNGUDI, CHENNAI - 600 096. …PETITIONERS (BY SMT.NIMISHA KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. NITIN RAMESH, ADVOCATE) AND: SRI VIJAYA SARATHY JAYANTHI S/O JAYANTHI LAKSHMINARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, R/AT FLAT NO.P-503, PURVA FOUNTAIN SQUARE APARTMENTS, VARTHUR MAIN ROAD, NEAR MARATHAHALLI BRIDGE, MARATHAHALLI, BENGALURU - 560 037. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. A.J.SRINIVASAN, ADVOCATE) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER Smt.Nimisha Kumar, counsel on behalf of Sri.Nitin Ramesh, counsel for the petitioner and Sri.A.J.Srinivasan, counsel for the respondent appeared in person. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:51858 WP No. 10458 of 2022 2. After arguing the matter for sometime, counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw the petition. 3. When queried, counsel submits that a conscious decision is taken about the withdrawal of the petition. 4. The oral submission is placed on record. 5. Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (JYOTI M) JUDGE SS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 35