APHC010033242021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY,THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 2315/2021 Between: 1. PATHAN KHADAR KHAN,, S/O. MAHABOOB KHAN, AGED 43 YEARS, OCC- BUSINESS, RIO. NAYABSAB STREET, RAYACHOTY TOWN AND MANDAL, Y.S.R.KADAPA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, Y.S.R.KADAPA DISTRICT AT KADAPA. 3. THE SUB DIVISIONAL POLICE OFFICER, RAYACHOTY TOWN AND MANDAL, Y.S.R.KADAPA DISTRICT. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, RAYACHOTY URBAN POLICE STATION, RAYACHOTY TOWN AND MANDAL, Y.S.R.KADAPA DISTRICT. 5. T JAGANNADHA, S/O. NOT KNOWN, POLICE CONSTABLE NO.820, WORKING IN RAYACHOTY URBAN POLICE STATION, RAYACHOTY TOWN AND MANDAL, Y.S.R.KADAPA DISTRICT. 6. MAYANA RAHIMAN KHAN, S/O. LATE M.JABBAR KHAN, AGED 64 YEARS, OCC- BUSINESS, R/O. D.NO.12/133-1, MEDARA STREET, KADAPA TOWN, Y.S.R.KADAPA DISTRICT. 2 7. MAYANA FAROOK ALI KHAN, S/O. LATE M.JABBAR KHAN, AGED 62 YEARS, OCC- BUSINESS, RIO. 12-2-709/58, FLAT NO.403, KEYA MARCEL APARTMENTS, NAVODAYA COLONY, GUDI MALKAPUR, MEHDIPATNAM, ASIFNAGAR, HYDERABAD, TELANAGANA STATE. 8. MAYANA USMAN KHAN, S/O. LATE M.JABBAR KHAN, AGED 60 YEARS, OCC- BUSINESS, R/O, D.NO.48/32-4-1-1, RAVEENDRA NAGAR, KADAPA TOWN, Y.S.R.KADAPA DISTRICT. 9. SUGAVASI SYAM KUMAR, S/O. VIJAYA RAGHAVULU, AGED 48 YEARS, RIO. DOOR NO.7/44, NARAYANA SWAMY STREET, MASAPETA POST, RAYACHOTY TOWN, Y.S.R.KADAPA DISTRICT. 10. CHERLOPALLI VENKATARATHNAMMA, D/O. RAMANJANEYULU, AGED 33 YEARS, R/O. SUBBA REDDY STREET, RAYACHOTY TOWN, Y.S.R.KADAPA DISTRICT. 11. GUDE RENUKA, W/O. ADINARAYANA REDDY, AGED 29 YEARS, R/O. POLIMERAPALLI VILLAGE, CHINNAMANDEM MANDAL, Y.S.R.KADAPA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of respondents, particularly respondents 3 to 5, at the instance of respondents 6 to 11 in insisting petitioner to appear before their authority and yield to the terms of latter connected to civil disputes pending adjudication before the learned Court of Senior Civil Judge, Rayachoty in O.S. No. 1 of 2021 and another civil disputes pending adjudication before the learned Court of Junior Civil Judge, Rayachoty in LA.No.527/2020 in S.R. No. 1418 of 2018 and further insisting him to withdraw the said suits, as illegal, irregular, irrational, without any authority of law and violative of Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents not to interfere with petitioner's personal life and liberty in any manner and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondents, particularly respondents 3 to 5 not to insist 3 petitioner to appear before their authority nor interfere with his personal life and liberty in any manner, pending disposal of the main Writ Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. NIMMAGADDA SATYANARAYANA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: 4 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 2315/2021 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of respondents particularly respondents 3 to 5, at the instance of respondents 6 to 11 in insisting petitioner to appear before their authority and yield to the terms of latter connected to civil disputes pending adjudication before the learned Court of Senior Civil Judge Rayachoty in O.S.No.1 of 2021 and another civil disputes pending adjudication before the learned Court of Junior Civil Judge, Rayachoty in I.A.No.527/2020 in S.R.No.1418 of 2018 and further insisting him to withdraw the said suits as illegal irregular irrational without any authority of law and violative of Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents not to interfere with petitioner’s personal life and liberty in any manner and pass…” 2. Heard Sri N.Satyanarayana, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri V.Farook, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the Police are interfering in the civil dispute between the petitioner and unofficial respondents. 4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit that no crime has been registered against the Petitioner and that the Police are not interfering in the civil dispute between the parties. 5 5. Recording the same, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the Police are directed not to interfere in the civil dispute between the parties except under due process of law. No costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATAJYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 15.10.2025 JLV 6 200 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.2315 of 2021 Dated: 15.10.2025 JLV