Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 56911 (AP)

Bukya Parvathi Bai, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/27284/2021 · 2025-10-28

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010451592021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 27284 OF 2021 Between: 1. Bukya Parvathi Bai,, W/o. Jayaram Naik, Aged 20 years, Occ. Cultivation, R/o. Adavi Brahmanapalli Thanda Village, Mudigubba Mandal, Anantapur District. ...Petitioner AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary Home Department, Secretariat Building, Velagapudi, Amaravati. 2. The Superintendent of Police, Anantapur, Anantapur District. 3. The Station House Officer, Mudigubba Police Station, Mudigubba, Anantapur District. 4. Ramavath Had Naik, S/o. Rama Swamy Naik, R/o. Adavi Brahmanapalli Thanda Village, Mudigubba Mandal, Anantapur District. 5. Avula Naik, S/o. Gangu Naik, R/o. Adavi Brahmanapalli Thanda Village, Mudigubba Mandal, Anantapur District ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Wirt, Direction or Order questioning the action of the respondents lto 3 in not taking any action against the respondent No.4 and 5 the FIR No. 266/2020 dated 20.8.2022 registered against the Respondent No.3 and 4 is illegal and arbitrary and violative of articles 14, 16 and 21 of Constitution of India and consequential direct the respondents No.2 and 3 to arrest the Respondent No.4 and 5 and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondents 2 and 4 to take necessary action for arrest of the (accused) respondents 4 and 5 in connection with the FIR 266/2020 dated 20.8.2020 as per law pending disposal of Writ Petition, and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: P NARAHARI BABU Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following order: THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 27284 OF 2021 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Wirt, Direction or Order questioning the action of the respondents lto 3 in not taking any action against the respondent No.4 and 5 the FIR No. 266/2020 dated 20.8.2022 registered against the Respondent No.3 and 4 is illegal and arbitrary and violative of articles 14, 16 and 21 of Constitution of India and consequential direct the respondents No.2 and 3 to arrest the Respondent No.4 and 5 and pass....…” 2. Heard Sri P.Narahari Babu, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home. 3. Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents, on written instructions would submit that investigation is completed and the case was referred as false and that the Court may pass appropriate orders. 4. Recording the same, this writ petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATAJYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 29.10.2025 KKV THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 27284 OF 2021 Date: 29.10.2025 KKV