Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 56900 (ALL)

SMT. KUSHUM SHARMA v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIA/6667/2025 · 2025-07-02

Mayur Jain Jt Registrar J Listing

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:103730 Court No. - 32 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 6667 of 2025 Petitioner :- Smt. Kushum Sharma Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Jagannath Singh Counsel for Respondent :- Anil Kumar Singh Baghel,C.S.C. Hon'ble Chandra Dhari Singh,J. 1. The instant writ petition has been filed seeking for the following relief:- " (I) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus with a direction to respondent nos. 3 and 4 to decide the representation dated 29.04.2025 moved by the petitioner to not compel the petitioner to appear in interview for her appointment in each and every session and the service of the petitioner be extended for further session subject the satisfactory work on the post of part time teacher in Virangana Awanti Bai Zila Panchayat Balika Inter College, Pilibhit for respective subjects." 2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioner without entering into the merits of the case made innocuous prayer that his representation dated 29.04.2025 pending before respondent nos. 3 and 4 may be directed to be decided in time bound manner. 3. Sri Anil Kumar Singh Baghel, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent nos.3 and 4 vehemently opposed the petition on merit, but has not opposed the prayer as made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner. 4. Heard Sri J. N. Singh, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, Sri Anil Kumar Singh Baghel, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent nos.3 and 4, Sri Santosh Kumar, learned Standing Counsel and perused the contents made in the writ petition. 5. Without entering into merits of the case, I am inclined to allow the innocuous prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner as no objection made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent nos. 3 and 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner is provided to file a fresh detailed representation along with the present writ petition and certified copy of this order before respondent nos.3 and 4 within 10 days. After receiving the said representation, the respondent nos.3 and 4 are directed to decide the said representation in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of the said representation. 6. With the aforesaid directions/observations, the present writ petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 3.7.2025/AKT (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR TRIPATHI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad