Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 56898 (PNJ)

OM PARKASH MIDDHA v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

CWP/13656/2025 · 2025-05-14

Aman Chaudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT 121 Om Parkash Middha State of Punjab CORAM: HON Present : AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) 1. directed to release all due which a representation dated 18.11.2024, Annexure P submitted, which has yet not evoked any response. He, on instructions, prays that a direction may be given to the respondents to decide the same in a time bound manner, to which learned State counsel has no objection. 2. merits of the case, this petition is hereby disposed of with a direction to the respondents to decide the representation period of 4 authorities would not address in a just, fair and reasonable manner. Upon doing so, after notice and hearing offered to h grant the benefit for IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Om Parkash Middha Versus f Punjab and Others CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Mr. K.K.Garg, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Manipal Singh Atwal, DAG, Punjab. AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) Learned counsel would contend that the respondents be directed to release all due retiral benefits which a representation dated 18.11.2024, Annexure P submitted, which has yet not evoked any response. He, on instructions, prays that a direction may be given to the respondents to decide the same in a time bound manner, to which learned State counsel has no objection. In view of the above and without commenting upon the merits of the case, this petition is hereby disposed of with a direction to the respondents to decide the representation 4 months, which this Court has no reason to believe the authorities would not address in a just, fair and reasonable manner. Upon doing so, after notice and hearing offered to h grant the benefit forthwith. Needless to say, if the orders are adverse to h IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-13656-2025 (O & M) Date of decision: 14.05.2025 ....Petitioner ...Respondents R. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Mr. Manipal Singh Atwal, DAG, Punjab. Learned counsel would contend that the respondents be retiral benefits to the petitioner, regarding which a representation dated 18.11.2024, Annexure P-4, has been submitted, which has yet not evoked any response. He, on instructions, prays that a direction may be given to the respondents to decide the same in a time bound manner, to which learned State counsel has no objection. In view of the above and without commenting upon the merits of the case, this petition is hereby disposed of with a direction to the respondents to decide the representation dated 18.11.2024, within a months, which this Court has no reason to believe the authorities would not address in a just, fair and reasonable manner. Upon doing so, after notice and hearing offered to him and if found entitled, thwith. Needless to say, if the orders are adverse to his PARVEEN KUMAR 2025.05.14 17:20 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CWP-13656-2025 -2- interest, the same shall contain reasons and the petitioner shall be free to seek legal redress thereupon. 14.05.2025 (AMAN CHAUDHARY) parveen kumar JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No PARVEEN KUMAR 2025.05.14 17:20 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.