Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 56890 (AP)

Gouravarapu Samrajyam, v. State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/15531/2023 · 2025-12-04

Ravi Cheemalapati

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010301782023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] FRIDAY,THE FIFTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 15531/2023 Between: 1. GOURAVARAPU SAMRAJYAM,, W/O. SUBBA REDDY, AGE 47 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURIST, R/O. 11-47, BOMMAREDDYVARI VEEDHI, TELAPROLU VILLAGE AND UNGUTUR MANDAL KRISHNA DISTRICT 2. BATTULA RAMAKRISHNA REDDY,, S/O. KOTI REDDY, AGE 62 YEARS, OCC . AGRICULTURIST, R/O. 11-51, BOMMAREDDYVARI VEEDHI, TELAPROLU VILLAGE AND UNGUTURU MANDAL KRISHNA DISTRICT ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY PANCHAYATRAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT 2. UNION OF INDIA, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF COMMUNICATIONS, DEPARTMENT OF TCLC COMMUNICATIONS, SANCHAR BHAVAN - 20, ASHOK ROAD, NEW DELHI - 110001 3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, MACHILIPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT 4. THE TAHSILDAR, UNGUTURU MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT 2 5. TELAPROLU GRAM PANCHAYAT, TELAPROLU VILLAGE, UNGUTURU MANDAL, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY 6. INDUS TOWERS LTD, REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, SY. NO. 133-4-51, 8TH FLOOR, SLN TERMINUS, BESIDE BOTONICAL GARDEN, GACHHIBOWLI, HYDERABAD - 500032 ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondent No.'s 1 to 5 in not taking action to restrain the 6th respondent from erecting telecommunication tower in Sy. No. 207 of Telaprolu Village, Ungutur Mandal, Krishna District as bad, illegal, unjust and violative of Articles 14 and 21 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents 1 to 5 not to permit and restrain the 6th respondent from erecting the cell tower in Sy. No. 207 of Telaprolu Village, Ungutur Mandal, Krishna District and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent No's 1 to 5 to restrain the 6th respondent from erecting the cell tower in Sy. No. 207 of Telaprolu Village, Ungutur Mandal, Krishna District and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. M VENKATA SAI NIKHIL KASHYAP Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. T D PANI KUMAR 2. GP FOR REVENUE 3. GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV 4. N SRIHARI (Standing Counsel for ZPP MPP and GRAM PANCHAYAT) The Court made the following: 3 ORDER: Sri Kannam Reddy Srinivasa, learned counsel representing Sri M.V.S Nikhil Kashyap, learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the cause in the writ petition does not survive and has become infructuous. Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. ____________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI Date: 05th December, 2025 RKS