Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 5689 (UTT)

SHIV KUMAR RAI v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPSB/119/2025 · 2025-05-01

Manoj Kumar Tiwari, Vivek Bharti Sharma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:UHC:3335-DB SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPSB/119/2025 Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. Hon’ble Vivek Bharti Sharma, J. (Per: Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.) 1. Mr. Prashant Trivedi, learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. Mr. J.S. Bisht, learned Standing Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand. 3. Mr. Pankaj Chaturvedi, learned counsel for respondent no. 2. 4. According to petitioner, he is eligible for promotion to the post of Superintending Engineer; however, his claim for promotion is not being considered. He submits that vacancies are available, therefore, delay on the part of the Authorities to held promotion exercise is unjustified. 5. Mr. J.S. Bisht, learned State Counsel submits that petitioner had made a representation regarding his promotion, therefore, the Competent Authority may be asked to look into the matter. 6. We, accordingly, dispose of the writ petition with a direction to Secretary, Drinking Water Department to examine petitioner’s request for holding of Departmental Promotion Committee, as per Rules, and pass appropriate order on petitioner’s representation, within eight weeks from the date of production of certified copy of this order. (Vivek Bharti Sharma, J.) (Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.) 01.05.2025 Aswal NITI RAJ SINGH ASWAL Digitally signed by NITI RAJ SINGH ASWAL DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=eacc6757ee7881e933ff8934f07477005aa85 f9802a3a08b08d1369512ea30f3, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=44EB54CBF00B7698CB6F10C2CE3D2 6F5C22DACF4F4610C1FE58A58531726FBB0, cn=NITI RAJ SINGH ASWAL Date: 2025.05.01 13:47:40 -07'00' 2025:UHC:3335-DB