Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Orissa · body

2025 DAILYLAW 5689 (ORI)

MANAS KUMAR SAHU v. ALOKA BHORA,PRINCIPAL CHIEF SECURITY COMMNR.,R.P.F, E.CO. RAILWAY

CONTC/4777/2025 · 2026-03-26

Aditya Kumar Mohapatra

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page 1 of 3. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK CONTC No.4777 of 2025 Manas Kumar Sahu ..... Petitioner Represented by Adv. - M/s Pramod Kishore Chand -versus- aloka bhora,principal chief security commnr.,r.p.f, e.co. railwayand another ..... Opposite Parties/Contemnors Represented by Adv. – Mr. A. Mohanty, ASC Mr. P.K. Parhi. DSGI Mr. D.P. Pattnaik, CGC CORAM: MR. JUSTICE ADITYA KUMAR MOHAPATRA ORDER 26.03.2026 Order No. 07. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual /Physical Mode). I.A. No.197 of 2026 2. This is an application filed at the instance of the Opposite Party/Contemnor No.1 with a prayer to delete the name of the Opposite Party-1-Contemnor i.e. one Alok Bohra, Principal Chief Secretary Commissioner from the purview of the present contempt application. Learned Senior counsel for the Opposite Party- Contemnor at the outset contended that the Opposite Party No.1- Contemnor has no role in the contempt proceeding and all orders Page 2 of 3. have been passed by the Opposite Party No.2-Contemnor. 3. In view of the aforesaid position, order dated 06.03.2026 is modified to the extent that the impugned order shall be implemented by the Opposite Party No.2-Contemnor as submitted by the learned Senior Counsel appearing for the Contemnor/Opposite Party. 4. Accordingly, the I.A. stands disposed of. I.A. No.198 of 2026 5. Learned counsel for the Opposite Party/Contemnor does not want to press the present I.A. No.198 of 2026. 6. In view of such submission, the I.A. stands disposed of. CONTC No.4777 of 2027 7. Heard learned counsel for the Parties. 8. Learned counsel for the Opposite Parties-Contemnors files an additional affidavit in Court today. The same is taken on record. 9. On perusal of the affidavit it appears that the Opposite Parties/Contemnors has categorically stated that the disciplinary proceeding which was initiated against the Petitioner has been kept in abeyance until further orders. A copy of the additional affidavit was served on the learned counsel for the Petitioner in Court today. Page 3 of 3. 10. Although there was no direction for the personal appearance of the Opposite Party No.2-Contemnor however he is present in Court. 11. Learned Senior counsel representing the Opposite Party No.2/Contemnor assures this Court that the interim order passed by this Court shall be complied with by the Opposite Parties till disposal of the writ application. 12. In such view of the matter, the contempt proceeding stands disposed of by granting liberty to revive the same in the event the Opposite Parties-Contemnors make any attempt to violate this Court’s Order. ( A.K. Mohapatra) Judge Sisir Designation: PERSONAL ASSISTANT