Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 56889 (AP)

K. Rohan Reddy, v. The National Board for Higher Mathematics,

WP/44154/2016 · 2025-10-06

Sumathi Jagadam

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010155762016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] TUESDAY,THE SEVENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 44154/2016 Between: 1. K. ROHAN REDDY,, AGED ABOUT 17 YEARS, BEING A MINOR, REPRESENTED BY HIS MOTHER S. SREEDEVI, RIO.H.N0.25-684-450, NEAR R.K.HOSPITAL, PADMAVATHI NAGAR, NANDYALA-518501,KURNOOL DISTRICT, A.P. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE NATIONAL BOARD FOR HIGHER MATHEMATICS, DEPARTMENT OF ATOMIC ENERGY, 1ST FLOOR, O.Y.C. BUILDING, C.S.M. MARG, MUMBAI-400001 MAHARASHTRA STATE. 2. B SURY, NATIONAL COORDINATOR FOR MATHEMATICS, OLYMPIAD PROGRAMME AND PROFESSOR, INDIAN STATISTICAL INSTITUTE, BANGALORE, KARNATAKA STATE. 3. HOMI SHABA CENTRE FOR SCRENCE EDUCATION, (TATA INSTITUTE OF FUNDAMENTAL RESEARCH) V.N. PURAV MARG, MANKHURD, MUMBAI-400088, MAHARASHTRA STATE. 4. REGIONAL MATHEMATICAL OLYMPIAD, REP. BY MR. K.M. SASTRY, RIO. 31-10-10C, DR. VISWANADHA SATYANARAYANA STREET, MACHAVARAM, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents herein in not conducting either fresh exams to all the students or revaluate the answer scripts of all the students who already appeared to "Regional Mathematical Olympiad exams" conducted by the 4th respondent herein on 16.10.2016 and also to the students who selected as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional, contrary to law, and against the principles of natural justice and consequently direct the 2 respondents herein to conduct fresh exams to all the students immediately or revaluate IA NO: 1 OF 2016(WPMP 54467 OF 2016 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents herein not to conduct Indian National Mathematical Olympiad Exams, pending disposal of the above writ petition IA NO: 1 OF 2017(WPMP 1092 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. T RAJENDRA PRASAD Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. P SARADA The Court made the following: 3 ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication and the writ petition has become infructuous. Recording the submission of learned counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM 7th October, 2025 cbn 4 700 THE HON’BLE SMT. JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WP No.44154 of 2016 7th October, 2025 cbn