BARUN KUMAR DAS v. THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS
WPO/477/2025 · 2025-08-12
Aniruddha Roy
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 56887 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 56887 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Form No.J(2)
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION
ORIGINAL SIDE
Present: The Hon’ble Justice Aniruddha Roy
WPO 477 OF 2025
-------------
BARUN KUMAR DAS
Vs.
THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.
For the Petitioner
Mr. Debdutta Basu, Adv.
For the CSTC
Mr. N.C. Bihani, Sr. Adv. Mr. Soumyajit Ghosh, Adv.
For the State
Heard on : 12.08.2025
Judgment on : 12.08.2025
Aniruddha Roy, J :
Affidavit of service filed in Court today, is taken on record. None appears for the State. Mr. Debdutta Basu, learned Advocate appears for the petitioner. Mr. N.C. Bihani, learned Senior Advocate, Mr. Soumyajit Ghosh, learned advocate appear for the Calcutta State Transport Corporation.
The petitioner retired from services of Calcutta State Transport Corporation (in short, CSTC) on May 31, 2023. The retiral benefits of the petitioner was paid in tranches. The petitioner was paid 20% of the
2 provident fund to the tune of Rs.6,87,000/- on June 23, 2023. Petitioner claims interest on such delayed payments. In the aforesaid facts and circumstances, after hearing the parties and considering the materials on record, I find that the petitioner is entitled to receive interest on Rs.6,87,000/- paid on account of provident fund from June 01, 2023 till June 23, 2023 at the rate of 6% per annum. The payment of the principal as also the interest shall be made within a period of three months from the date of communication of a server copy of this
order. The CSTC is directed to pay the balance of the unpaid provident fund amount with interest from June 01, 2023 until the actual payment thereof @6% per annum, failing which the entire sum will attract interest @ 8% per annum. Nothing further remains to be adjudicated in this writ petition. The same is accordingly disposed of. Since I have not called for any affidavits, the allegations contained in the writ petition are deemed to have not been admitted by the respondents. All parties including the CSTC shall act on the basis of the server copy of this order without insisting upon production of a certified copy thereof.
(Aniruddha Roy, J.)
mg