Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 56885 (PAT)

Nasima @ Naseema v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./48184/2025 · 2025-08-11

Anil Kumar Sinha

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.48184 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-92 Year-2025 Thana- LODIPUR District- Bhagalpur ====================================================== 1. Nasima @ Naseema W/O Haneef @ Hanif @ Md. Hanif R/O Vill.- Chakdariya, P.s.- Lodipur, Dist.- Bhagalpur. 2. Sakila @ Bibi Sakila W/O Md. Anwar R/O Vill.- Chakdariya, P.s.- Lodipur, Dist.- Bhagalpur. 3. Sajan @ Bibi Sajan W/O Md. Nazin R/O Vill.- Chakdariya, P.s.- Lodipur, Dist.- Bhagalpur. 4. Roksar @ Bibi Kuksar @ Roskr@ Bibi Ruksar D/O Md. Kamal R/O Vill.- Chakdariya, P.s.- Lodipur, Dist.- Bhagalpur. 5. Nago @ Bibi Nagma W/O Md. Imtiyaz R/O Vill.- Chakdariya, P.s.- Lodipur, Dist.- Bhagalpur. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dhananjay Kumar Gupta For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ram Sumiran Rai ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 2 11-08-2025 1. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. 2. This application, for grant of anticipatory bail, arises out of Lodipur Police Station Case No. 92 of 2025, dated 01.05.2025, disclosing offences under Sections 191(2)/190/126(2)/115(2)/117(2)/110 of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita. 3. The prosecution case, as per the First Information Report, is that on 01.05.2025, at about 06:30 PM, in the evening, Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.48184 of 2025(2) dt.11-08-2025 2/3 while the informant was watering his wall, suddenly the petitioners and other accused persons arrived there. Co- accused Anarul and Imtiaz assault the informant by means of iron-rod, co-accused Nazim assault by means lathi and Chunu assaulted by brick. It has further been alleged that the petitioners were holding the informant and pressed his neck. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are ladies and wives of co-accused persons. The allegation of assault is not against the petitioners. He next submits that both the parties are next door neighbours having land dispute. He further submits that the specific allegation of assault is against co-accused Anarul, Imtiaz, Nazim and Chunu. 5. Having regard to the submissions made on behalf of the parties and taking into consideration the fact that specific allegation of assault is against co-accused persons and the petitioner are ladies, I am inclined to grant the petitioners privilege of anticipatory bail. 6. This application is, accordingly, allowed. 7. Let the petitioners, above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the Court below within four Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.48184 of 2025(2) dt.11-08-2025 3/3 weeks, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Bhagalpur, in connection with Lodipur Police Station Case No. 92 of 2025, subject to the condition laid down under Section 482 (2) of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. ashwani/- (Anil Kumar Sinha, J) U T