- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:30304 RSA No. 1138 of 2014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 1138 OF 2014 (PAR) BETWEEN: B.V.SHIVARUDRAPPA S/O LATE B.R.VERAPPA, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, RESIDING AT BHAVIKERE VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, NELANGALA TALUK …APPELLANT (BY SMT.E.R.PANKAJAMANI, ADV. FOR PROPOSED A1 (A TO C)) AND: 1. VIJAYAKUMARI W/O SATISH AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, RESIDING AT BHAVANIKERE VILLAGE, NELAMANGALA TALUK, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT. 2. SARVAMANGALA W/O RUDRAMURTHY AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, RESIDING AT RAGHAVENDRA LAYOUT, PRASANNA ANJANEYA TRUST, NELAMANGALA TOWN, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT. Digitally signed by C HONNUR SAB Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:30304 RSA No. 1138 of 2014 3. B.V.LOKESH S/O LATE B.R.VERAPPA, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, M.E.I GORGUNTEPALYA, YESHWANTHAPUR, BANGALORE. 4. B.V.UMESHM S/O B.R.VEERAPPA, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, P.C.2375, POLICE COMMISSIONER, OFFICE, C.O.D.VEHICLE DEPARTMENT, (M.T.SECTION), PALACE ROAD, BANGALORE. 5. INDIRA W/O SHIVARUDRAPPA, AGED ABUOT 60 YEARS, RESIDING AT INDIRANAGAR, NELAMANGALA TALUK. 6. RUDRA MURTHY @ GUNDA S/O LATE B.R.VEERAPPA, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, RESIDING AT 2ND CROSS ROAD, CONTRACTOR SHIVASWAMY BUILDING, RAGHAVENDRANAGAR, PRASANNA ANJANEYA TRUST, NELAMANGALA TALUK 7. K.LALITHA PRAKASH W/O C.R.PRAKASH, AGED ABUOT 39 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.44, 10TH CROSS, K.R.LAYOUT, J.P.NAGAR 6TH PHASE, - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:30304 RSA No. 1138 of 2014 BANGALORE-78 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. D PRABHAKAR FOR R1.,ADVOCATE) THIS RSA IS FILED U/S. 100 OF CPC., PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGEMENT & DECREE DTD 07.03.2014 IN R.A.No.3/2012 PASSED BY THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & JMFC., NELAMANGALA. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE ORAL JUDGMENT Learned counsel for the proposed appellants submits that it is informed to her that the dispute between the parties is settled. 2. Despite the best efforts made by learned counsel for the appellants, the appellants are not responding to the phone calls and letters said to have been addressed by the counsel for the appellant. Appeal is of the year 2014. This Court does not find any reason to adjourn the matter. The appeal is dismissed for non prosecution. Sd/- (ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE) JUDGE KTY/List No.: 1 Sl No.: 5