APHC010445532024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION No. 23318/2024 Between: 1. GOPAVARAM VENKATARAMANAMMA, W/O.G.RAJAGOPAL, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, OCC:AGRICULTURE, R/O.GOPAVARAM VILLAGE AND MANDAL, Y.S.R. DISTRICT, ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOME, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI. GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, YSR KADAPADISTRICT,KADAPA.. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, GOPAVARAM POLICE STATION, Y.S.R.DISTRICT. 4. UDAYABHARATHI, TAHSILDAR, GOPAVARAMMANDAL, Y.S.R.DISTRICT. 5. AMARNATH REDDY, MANDAL REVENUE INSPECTOR, GOPAVARAMMANDAL, Y.S.R.DISTRICT. 6. VENKATESWARLU, VILLAGE REVENUE OFFICER, GOPAVARAMMANDAL, Y.S.R.DISTRICT. 7. G GOPALA KRISHNA, CONSTABLE, BADVEL POLICE STATION, R/O. GOPAVARAM VILLAGE AND MANDAL, Y.S.R.DISTRICT. 8. SUBBARAYUDU, OWNER OF JCB BEARING NO.AP-KG-1754 R/O.BADVEL, Y.S.R.DISTRICT. 9. MR CHANDRA MOHAN RAO, REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER BADVEL REVENUE DIVISION, BADVEL, Y.S.R.DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction on the part of the respondents No.2 and 3 in acting on my complaint, dated 17-09-2024 wherein I has requested to take action against the respondents No.4 to 9 2 for illegal cutting of my mango trees and teak wood trees planted in the land in an extent of Ac.0.30 Cents in Sy.No.290 of Gopavaram Village fields GopavaramMandal, Y.S.R.District, that too at midnight of 16.09.2024 during the pendency of the Writ Petition No.20511 of 2024 without issuance of any notice to me as illegal, arbitrary, apart from being violative of fundamental rights guaranteed to me under Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently respondent No.2 and 3 to register the FIR against the respondents No.4 to 9 and take appropriate action and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SATISH SANDU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 3 The Court made the following: ORDER: The instant Writ Petition is filed by the Petitioner seeking indulgence of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: “.... to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction on the part of the respondents No.2 and 3 in acting on my complaint, dated 17-09-2024 wherein I has requested to take action against the respondents No.4 to 9 for illegal cutting of my mango trees and teak wood trees planted in the land in an extent of Ac.0.30 Cents in Sy.No.290 of Gopavaram Village fields GopavaramMandal, Y.S.R.District, that too at midnight of 16.09.2024 during the pendency of the Writ Petition No.20511 of 2024 without issuance of any notice to me as illegal, arbitrary, apart from being violative of fundamental rights guaranteed to me under Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently respondent No.2 and 3 to register the FIR against the respondents No.4 to 9 and take appropriate action and pass ...” None represented for the Petitioner. Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on written instructions would submit that since the subject matter is purely civil in nature, respondent Police did not take any action on the petitioner’s complaint and that the Court may pass appropriate Orders. In that view, this Writ Petition is disposed of. Petitioner is at liberty to recourse the remedy before appropriate forum according to law. No order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/* 4 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Writ Petition No. 23318 of 2024 07.10.2025 Mjl /*