1 NJS, J & GTK, J LAAS_65_2015 APHC010432172015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3549] MONDAY,THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL SUIT NO: 65 of 2015 Between: 1. THE SPECIAL DEPUTY COLLECTOR, T.G.P., RAPUR AT NELLORE, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. ...APPELLANT AND 1. NALLAVADLA MALLIKARJUNA REDDY 361 OTHERS, S/O SIDDA REDDY, GUNDAVOLU VILLAGE, RAPUR MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 2. NALLAVADLA LAKSHMINARAYANA REDDY, S/O. MALLIKARJUNA REDDY GUNDAVOLU VILLAGE, RAPUR MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 3. MALLIREDDY RATHNAMMA, W/O. NARAYANA REDDY GUNDAVOLU VILLAGE, RAPUR MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 4. MALLIREDDY ERATHNAMMA, W/O. NARAYANA REDDY GUNDAVOLU VILLAGE, RAPUR MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 5. KALTHURI JYOTHI BAI, W/O. PENCHALA REDDY GUNDAVOLU VILLAGE, RAPUR MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 2 NJS, J & GTK, J LAAS_65_2015 6. NALLAVADLA SYAMSUNDAR REDDY, S/O. MALLA REDDY GUNDAVOLU VILLAGE, RAPUR MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 7. MADAMALA SUSEELAMMA, W/O. PITCHIREDDY GUNDAVOLU VILLAGE, RAPUR MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 8. MALLIREDDY RAJENDRAPRASAD REDDY, S/O. AUDINARAYANA REDDY GUNDAVOLU VILLAGE, RAPUR MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 9. MALLIREDDY HARSHITHA, D/O. RAJENDRAPRASAD REDDY GUNDAVOLU VILLAGE, RAPUR MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 10. MALLIREDDY ANITHA, W/O. RAJENDRAPRASAD REDDY GUNDAVOLU VILLAGE, RAPUR MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 11. BATHINA VENGA REDDY VANGA REDDY, S/O SUBBA REDDY, 12. BATHINA SRIDHAR REDDY, S/O VENGA REDDY, 13. BATHINA SUBBA REEDDY, S/O VENGA REDDY 14. BATHINA SURENDRA REDDY, S/O VENGA REDDY, 15. MADAMALA PARANDHAMI REDDY, S/O.SUNDARARAMI REDDY, 16. GADDAM RAMANAMMA, W/O NARAYANA REDDY, 17. VANKIVOLU RADHAKRISHNA REDDY, S/OVENKATASUBBA REDDY, 18. VANKIVOLU VENKATA SUBBA REDDY, S/ORADHAKRISHNA REDDY, 19. VANKIVOLU RAVINDRA REDDY, S/O SESHA REDDY, 20. VANKIVOLU SESHA REDDY, S/O VENKATA SUBBAREDDY, 21. VANKIVOLU SRIDHAR REDDY, S/O. RAMANA REDDY, 22. VANKIVOLU RAMANAMMA, W/O RAMANA REDDY 23. PENGANI ESWARA REDDY, S/O. RAGHAVAREDDY 3 NJS, J & GTK, J LAAS_65_2015 24. PENGANI VISWANADHA REDDY, S/O ESWARA REDDY 25. PENGANI SIVARAMI REDDY, S/O RAGHAVATEDDY , 26. PENGANI SANKARA REDDY, S/O RAGHAVA REDDY 27. UNNAM MAHADEVA REDDY, S/O AKKIREDDY 28. PENGANI RAJENDRAPRASAD REDDY, S/O RAGHAVA REDDY 29. PENGANI VIJAYALAKSHMI, W/O RAJENDRAPRASAD REDDY 30. PENGANI JAYAMMA, W/O PENCHALA REDDY 31. PENGANI VENKATARAMANA REDDY, S/O SUBBARAMI REDDY 32. KOTAMREDDY MUNIMOHAN REDDY, S/O RAJAGOPAL REDDY 33. GADDAM ESWARA REDDY, S/O RAMI REDDY 34. GADDAM VENKATESWARA REDDY, S/O RAMI REDDY 35. GADDAM SRINIVASULU REDDY, S/O. RAMI REDDY 36. GADDAM VENKATA REDDY, S/O. RAMIREDDY 37. GADDAM KRISHNAMMA, W/O RAMI REDDY 38. GADDAM VARALAKSHMI, W/O VENKATESWARA REDDY 39. GADDAM PRASAD REDDY, S/O RAMIREDDY GADDAM RAMANA REDDY S/O NARAYANA REDDY 40. GADDAM PRASAD REDDY, S/O NARAYANA REDDY 41. PENGANI AMARANATH REDDY, S/O SIVARAMIREDDY 42. MALIREDDY KUMARA VENKATESWAR REDDY, S/O. VENKATARAMANA REDDY 43. MALIREDDY MANGAMMA, W/O VENKATARAMANA REDDY 44. MALIREDDY SANKARA REDDY, S/O MUNIREDDY 45. MALIREDDY JANARDHAN REDDY, S/O. NARAYANAREDDY 46. MALIREDDY SANJEEVA REDDY, S/O RAMACHANDRA REDDY 47. MALIREDDY RAMACHANDRA REDDY, S/O NARASAREDDY 4 NJS, J & GTK, J LAAS_65_2015 48. MALIREDDY PRABHAKARA REDDY, S/O PITCHI REDDY 49. MALIREDDY RAGHURAMI REDDY, S/O PITCHI REDDY 50. RACHAKONDA MASTHANAIAH, S/O CHINA MASTHANAIAH 51. MALIREDDY BHASKARA REDDY, S/O RAMACHANDRA REDDY 52. CHENNEMSETTY MUNEMMA DIED, HER. LR DAUGHTER PILLI SUBBAMMA W/O ANKAIAH 53. MALIREDDY SANJIVA REDDY, S/O RAMACHANDRA REDDY 54. TALAMANCHI SUJATHAMMA, W/O SURESH KUMAR REDDY 55. MALIREDDY SUJATHA, W/O SIVASANKARA REDDY 56. TALAMANCHI SUJATHAMMA, W/O SURESHKUMAR REDDY 57. MOLAKAL SESHA REDDY, S/O KODANDARAMI REDDY 58. GADDAM AUDEMMA, W/O LAKSHMINARASA REDDY 59. KETHU DHARANI, W/O BHASKARA REDDY 60. CHILLAKURU VASUKUMAR REDDY, S/O DASARATHARAMI REDDY 61. CHEJARLA LAKSHMIPRASANNA, W/O RADHAKRISHNA 62. CHEJARLA KANTHAMA, W/O CHINA ANKAIAH 63. CHEJARLA RATHNAMMA, W/O RAMANAIAH 64. SANKULA DHANALAKSHMI, W/O ESWARAIAH 65. ALAKUNTA VENKATAIAH, S/O PEDDAIAH 66. ALAKUNTA SRINIVASULU, S/O CHINA VENKATAIAH 67. YAKASIRI CHINNAIAH CHINNABBAIAH, S/O ANKAIAH 68. YAKASIRI ANKAMMA DIED, W/O ANKAIAH 69. MADDE MALLIKARJUNA, S/O ESWARAIAH 70. MADDE KOTESWARA RAO, S/O SIVAIAH 71. KUKATI SAMBAIAH, S/O CHINA PULLALAH 5 NJS, J & GTK, J LAAS_65_2015 72. JOREPALLI CHENCHAJAH, S/O CHENCHAIAH 73. PARITALA VENAKTARAMANAIAH, S/O NARASIMHULU 74. TANNEERU SUBRAHMANYAM, S/O MALLIKARJUNA 75. PILLI ANKAIAH DIED HIS LRS CLAIMANT NOS 354, - 76. CHALLA VENKATAMMA, W/O CHINA VENKAIAH 77. MADDE SANKARAIAH, S/O ESWARAIAH 78. RACHAKONDA SIVAIAH, S/O. KRISHNAIAH 79. MADDE PENCHALARAMAIAH, S/O RAGHAIAH @ RANGAIAH 80. KUKATI CHINNA PULLAIAH, S/O. BANGARAIAH 81. BITRAGUNTA DASAIAH, S/O VENGAIAH 82. RACHAKONDA NARAYANA, S/O PEDA PENCHALAIAH 83. MADDE RAJESWARAMMA, W/O CHANDRAIAH 84. PEDDIBOYINA SUBBAMMA DIED HER LRS, CLAIMANT NOS. 356 TO 359 85. CHINTHAM SUKKU BAI, W/O VENKATESWARLU 86. KURAPTI VISALAKSHMAMMA DIED PER LRS 550 TO 553, W/O JANAKIRAMA RAJU 87. KURUPATI RAMALAKSHAMAMMA, D/O LINGA RAJU 88. TALAMANCHI SUJATHAMMA, W/O SURESHKUMAR REDDY 89. MIRIYALA SIVARAMAIAH, S/O SUBBAIAH 90. MIRIYALA NARASIMHULU, S/O SUBBAIAH 91. ANKUPALLI ANKAIAH, S/O ROSAIAH 92. KUKATI MAHESWARAIAH, S/O PEDA PULLAIAH 93. RACHAKONDA PENCHALASWAMY, S/O NARASAIAH 94. MIRIYALA PENCHALA SUBBAIAH, S/OSUBBARAMAIAH 95. MIRIYALA SRIHARI, S/O. PENCHALA SUBBAIAH 6 NJS, J & GTK, J LAAS_65_2015 96. SK MASUM SAHEB, S/O. KALESHA SAHEB 97. M ANITHA, W/O. MASTHANAIAH 98. GUNJI KRISHNAIAH, S/O. RAMAIAH 99. ANKUPALLI ARUNA, W/O. CHINAPAPAIAH 100. GUNJI RAMAIAH DIED, S/O. CHENCHU RAMAIAH 101. AMATHALURU PRAMEELAMMA, W/O. VENKATARAMAIAH 102. ALAKUNTA PENCHAIAH, S/O. VENKATAIAH 103. ALAKUNTA ANKAIAH DIED, S/O. VENKATESHUY 104. PELLURU PULLAIAH DIED PER LRS OF 564 TO 566, S/O. VENKATA SUBBAIAH 105. GUNDAVOLU MALLIKARJUNA, S/O PEDA MALLAIAH 106. GUNDAVOLU PEDA MALLAIAH, S/O YARRAIAH 107. ALAKUNTA PENCHALAIAH, S/O RAMAIAH 108. CHALLA NARASAMMA, W/O PEDA VENKTA RAMAIAH 109. ALAKUNTA VENKATAIAH DIED, S/O VENKATESHAIAH 110. ALAKUNTA PARANDHAMAIAH, S/O VENKATAIAH 111. JOREPALLI SUBBAMMA, W/O PENCHALAIAH 112. PIILI RAMANAIAH, S/O ANKAIAH 113. PILLI VEERAMMA, W/O. ANKAIAH 114. KUNCHAM RAMANAMMA, W/O. CHINA PENCHALAIAH 115. KUNCHAM RAJAIAH, S/O VENKATA SWAMY 116. CHALLA RATNAIAH, S/O PENCHALAIAH 117. CHALLA PENCHALAIAH, S/O PENCHALAIAH 118. KUNCHAM PENCHALAIAH, S/O PEDA PENCHALAIAH 119. KUNCHAM HARAIAH, S/O VENKATASWAMY 7 NJS, J & GTK, J LAAS_65_2015 120. RACHAKONDA PENCHALAIAH, S/O NARASAIAH 121. JOREPALLI CHENCHAIAH, S/O CHENCHAIAH 122. PEDDIBOINA MADHAVAIAH, S/O VEERASWAMY 123. ADVANAPU RAMANAMMA, W/O BUTCHAIAH 124. BITRAGUNTA ESWARAIAH, S/O VENGAIAH 125. BOTLA SESHADRI, S/O SUBBARAMAIAH 126. GALI NARASAIAH, S/O PENCHALAIAH 127. YAKASIRI NARASAIAH, S/O ANKAIAH 128. YEPINAPI RAMANAIAH, S/O ANKAIAH 129. GUNDAVOLU NARASAMMA, W/O RAMASWAMY 130. VANKIVOLU VIJAYALAKSHMI, W/O SRIDHAR REDDY 131. GUNDAVOLU PAPAIAH, S/O CHINA MALLAIAH 132. BODA PITCHAMMA DIED HER LRS CLAIMANT, NO.360 TO 362 133. CHEJARLA NARASAIAH, S/O CHINA ANKAIAH 134. BITRAGUNTSA BHASKAR, S/O. LAKHMI NARASAIAH 135. ADVANAPU RAMANAIAH, S/O BUTCHIAH 136. JOREPALLI CHENCHAIAH, S/O PENCHALAIAH 137. KUKATI SANTHAMMA, W/O SANKARAIAH 138. BITRAGUNTA RAMANAIAH, S/O LAKSHMI NARASAIAH 139. KUKATI PEDA PULLAIAH DIED PER LRS 547 TO 549, S/O BANGARAIAH 140. KUKATI PEDA PULLAIAH, S/O BANGARAIAH 141. KUKATI DASARADHARAMAIAH, S/O PEDA PULLAIAH 142. GUNDAVOLU BUJJAMMA, W/O PAPAIAH 143. BOTLA PRABHAVATHI, W/O KOTESWARA RAO 8 NJS, J & GTK, J LAAS_65_2015 144. MIRIYALA VENKATESWARLU, S/O PENCHALA SUBBAIAH 145. MACHIRAJU SUNDARAMMA, W/O PENCHALARAMA RAJU 146. PEDDIBOINA PENCHARAIAH, S/O PENCHALA RAMAIAH 147. TANNERU PAVANI, D/O PEDA MASTHANALAH 148. MIRIYALA SAYAMMA, W/O SUBBAIAH 149. DAGGUMATI RAJESWARAMMA, W/O VENKATA 150. KUNTAMURI NAVANEETHAMMA, W/O GANGULU 151. PENGANI RAJAMMA, W/O MEERA REDDY 152. CHALLA PEDA VENKAIAH, S/O BODEIAH 153. BODA RAMA SWAMY, S/O RAMAIAH 154. GUNDAVOLU CHINA MALLAIAH, S/O RAMAIAH 155. GUNDAVOLU RAMAIAH, S/O CHINA MALIAIAH 156. CHALLA VENKATAMMA, W/O CHINA VENKATARAMAIAH 157. CHALLA ANKARAO, S/O PEDA VENKATAIAH 158. KAVETI VENKATA RAMAIAH, S/O KANNAIAH 159. DUGGINETI RAMANAIAH, S/O CHINA ANKAIAH 160. GUNGI ANKAMMA, W/O KRISHNAIAH 161. BODA DASAIAH, S/O SUBBAIAH 162. DUGGINENTI VENKATA RAMANAIAH, S/O PEDA ANKAIAAH 163. DUGGINETI PEDA MALLAIAH, S/O PENCHALA RAMAIAH 164. PEDDIBOINA SRIHARI, S/O VEERASWAI 165. GUNGI LAKSHMAIAH, S/O CHENCHU RAMAIAH 166. GANGODI MANOHAR, S/O RAMANAIAH 167. GANGODI RAMANAIAH, S/O MALLAIAH 168. PATHIKODUKU GOPAL RAJU, S/O PEDA MUNIRAJU 9 NJS, J & GTK, J LAAS_65_2015 169. PACHURU CHINAKKA, W/O VENKATASWAMI 170. GANGODI MURALI, S/O RAMANAIAH 171. ALAKUNTA SARADAMMA, W/O RATNAIAH 172. BIRADARAJU RAMANAMMA, W/O PARTHASARATHI RAJU 173. SANKULA CHINA ESWARAIAH, S/O ESWARAIAH 174. PANCHETI SRINIVASULU, S/O KANNAIAH 175. INJETI MUNEIAH, S/O SIDDARAMAIAH 176. INJETI ANKAIAH, S/O SIDDARAMAIAH 177. TATA PENCHALA SETTY, S/O MANDAIAH 178. GUNJI CHENCHAIAH, S/O RAMAIAH 179. TATA MADHUSUDHANA RAO, S/O PENCHALA SETTY 180. PARUCHURU PENCHALAIAH, S/O VENKATASWAMY 181. CHALLA PEDA PULLAIAH, S/O CHINA VENKATARAMAIAH 182. KOTAMREDDY RAMANAMMA, W/O RAJAGOPAL REDDY 183. BANDI NARENDRA, S/O VENKATAPATHI 184. METUKURU RAMANAMMA, W/O PENCHALAREDDY 185. CHANDALURU JAYAMMA, W/O PULLAIAH 186. PEDDIBOINA VEERA SWAMY, S/O MALLAIAH 187. PENAGANI MOHAN REDDY, S/O MUNIRAMI REDDY 188. PEDDIBOINA SUBBARATNAMMA, W/O NARASAIAH 189. AKILI RAMANA REDDY, S/O VENKATA REDDY 190. MADDE RAMADEVI, W/O CHANDRAIAH 191. MADDE GANGADHAR, S/O CHANDRAIAH 192. ADVANAPU DASARATHARAMAIAH, S/O NARASAIAH @ MALLAIAH 10 NJS, J & GTK, J LAAS_65_2015 193. MORA RAMAIAH, S/O PENCHAIAIAH 194. ANKUPALLI SAROJANAMMA, W/O NAGAIAH 195. GUNDAVOLU NAGAMMA, W/O CHINA PAPAIAH 196. JOREPALLI CHENCHAIAH, S/O CHENCHAIAH 197. OMMINA SUBBARAO, S/O SUBRAHMANYAM 198. BIRUDARAJU RAMASUBBAMMA, W/O PENCHALA RAJU 199. PATHIKODUKU ESWARAMMA, W/O CHINA MUNI RAJU 200. CHEJARLA SUBBAIAH, S/O CHINA ANKAIAH 201. M NAGARAJU, S/O PENCHALA RAMARAJU 202. ALAKUNTA KRISHNAIAH, S/O PENCHALAIAH 203. ALAKUNTA CHINAKKA DIED, W/O GURAVAIAH 204. AIAKUNTA NARASAIAH, S/O PAPAIAH 205. ALAKUNTA SEENAIAH, S/O PENCHALAIAH 206. ALAKUNTA RAMAIAH DIED, S/O VENKATESAIAH 207. BOTLA ANKAMMA, W/O SUBBARAMAIAH 208. BITRAGUNTA SUBBA IAKSHMAMMA, W/O VENGAIAH 209. BIRADARAJU RAMASUBBAMMA, W/O PENCHALARAJU 210. ADVANAPU PENCHALA LAKSHMAMMA, W/O NARASAIAH 211. DUPATI JAYARAMARAJU, S/O MURTHIRAJU 212. AMBATI LAKSHMI NARASAMMA, W/O ANKAIAH 213. AMBATI SAMBAIAH, S/O VENKAIAH 214. AVULA SUBBARAMAIAH, S/O SUBBAIAH 215. KUNCHEM LAKSHMAMMA, W/O PEDA PENCHALAIAH 216. ALAKUNTA ANKAIAH, S/O ANKAIAH 217. AVULA NARASIMHULU, S/O SUBBARAMAIAH 11 NJS, J & GTK, J LAAS_65_2015 218. SANKULA SUBBAMMA, W/O PEDA ESWARAIAH 219. ALAKUNTA CHENCHU LAKSHMI, W/O CHINA VENKATAIAH 220. GUNJI CHENCHAIAH, S/O CHENCHAIAH 221. GUNJI CHINA CHENCHAIAH, S/O CHENCHAIAH 222. KANDIPAKA PENCHALAMMA, W/O MUNEIAH 223. KANIPAKA SRINIVASULU, S/O VENKATAIAH 224. KADIPAKA CHINRANJEEVI, S/O VENKATAIAH 225. KANDIPAKA MUNEIAH, S/O PEDA MUNEIAH 226. KOMMALA AMARENDRA, S/O ANKAIAH 227. TYDUPATI RAMAIAH, S/O PAPAIAH 228. KARIPAM PULLAMMA, W/O RAMANAIAH 229. TAMBULURU VENKATANARASAIAH, S/O RAMANAIAH 230. KONDIPAKU RAMANAIAH, S/O NAGAIAH 231. POTTELA PENCHALAIAH, S/O PENCHALAIAH 232. KADIRI ESWARAIAH, S/O MUNEIAH 233. TAMBULURI MASTHANAMMA, W/O RAMARAO 234. KUDIGUNTA TIRIPALU, S/O GURAVAIAH 235. KADIRI RATNAMMA, W/O RAMANAIAH 236. KADIRI BUJJAMMA, W/O CHINA VEMAIAH 237. KUNCHAM SUBBARAYUDU, S/O GOPALAIAH, 238. KADIRI SANKARAMMA, W/O PEDA VEMAIAH, 239. KADIRI MUKUNDAMMA, W/O VENKATAIH, 240. KADIRI MUNIKRISHNA, S/O. MUNEIAH 241. KADIRI SESHADRI, S/O VENKATADRI 242. KARIPAM ANKAIAH, S/O VENKATRAMIAH, 12 NJS, J & GTK, J LAAS_65_2015 243. KADIRI PULLAMMA, W/O VENKARIAH 244. KADIRI VENKATESWARLU, S/O VENKATAIAH, 245. TAMBULURI KRISHNALAH, S/O PONDAIAH 246. KADIRI PENCHALAMMA, W/O VENKATAKRISHNAIAH 247. KADIRI DASRADHARAMAIAH, S/O PENCHALAIAH, 248. KADIRI RAJKUMAR, S/O CHINNAIAH 249. KADIRI CHINNA ROSAIAH DIED PER LRS OF 560 TO 563, S/O TIRUPALAIAH, 250. KADIRI BHASKAR, S/O CHINNAIAH 251. YELAKACHARLA PENCHALAIAH, S/O VENKARAIAH 252. YELAKACHARLA RAMANAIAH, S/O PENCHALAIAH 253. TAMBULURU MALEMKONDAIAH, S/O VENKATAIAH @ PONDAIAH 254. TAMBULURU PURUSHATTAM, S/O. KONDAIAH 255. KOTHA GANAPATHI, S/O ERUKULAIAH, 256. KOTHA PENCHALANARASAMMA, W/O ERUKALAIAH, 257. MUTHUKURU RAMAIAH, S/O SUBBAIAH 258. KARIPAM MUNIKRISHNAIAH, S/O MUNEIAH, 259. NALLAVADLA CHANDRASEKHAR REDDY DIED PER LRS OF 558 AND 559, S/O SIDDA REDDY, 260. KADIRI RAVIKUMAR, S/O NARASIAH @ PENCHALAIAH 261. KADIRI NARASIMHULU, S/O NARASAIAH @ PENCHALAIAH, 262. KADIRI PENCHALAIAH, S/O NARASAIAH 263. KADIRI POLAMMA DIED PER LRS 554 TO 557, W/O PENCHALAIAH 264. KADIRI VENKATAIAH, S/O MANTAIAH 13 NJS, J & GTK, J LAAS_65_2015 265. KADIRI SRINIVASULUR, S/O VENKATAIAH 266. KADIRI RAMANAMMA, W/O PENCHALAIAH, 267. KADIRI PENCHALANARASAIAH, S/O PENCHALAIAH 268. TAMMULURU PENCHALAMMA, W/O PENCHALAIAH 269. KONDIPAGU SUBBAIAH, S/O NAGAIAH 270. KADIRI JAYAMMA, W/O PENCHALAIAH 271. KOPPALA KANTHAIAH, S/O PENCHALAIAH 272. TAMMULURU PENCHALAMMA, W/O LAKSHMAIAH 273. KADIRI VENKATESWARLU, S/O NARASAIAH @ BUTTAIAH, 274. TAMMULURU NARASAIAH, S/O VENKATANARASAIH 275. KANAGALA SUBBAMMA, W/O VENKATAIAH, 276. KADIRI PULLAIAH, S/O NARASIMHULU, 277. KADIRI ESWARAMMA, W/O PENCHALASWAMY, 278. KADIRI BUJJAMMA, W/O HARI NARYANA, 279. KADIRI RAMANAMMA, W/O CHANDRAIAH, 280. KADIRI PULLAMMA, W/O NARASAIAH 281. KADIRI RATHNAIAH, S/O NARASAIAH, 282. KADIRI CHINNAIAH, S/O NARASAIAH 283. KONDIPAGU VENKATAIAH, S/O NAGAIAH 284. KONDIPAGU ANKAMMA, W/O NAGAIAH 285. KONDIPAGU NAGAIAH, S/O VENKATANARASAAH 286. KARIPAM VENKATARAMAIAH, S/O PENCHALAIAH @ DEVUDAIAH 287. KADIRI VENKATA SWAMY, S/O CHINA ROSAIAH 288. KONDIPAGU VENKATAIAH, S/O TIRUPALAIAH 14 NJS, J & GTK, J LAAS_65_2015 289. KADIRI PENCHALA NARASAIAH, S/O PONAIAH 290. KADIRI NARAMMA, W/O KONDAIAH 291. KADIRI SAMBA SIVAIAH, S/O PENCHALA NARASAIAH 292. REVURU RAMANAIAH, S/O PEDA PENCHALAIAH 293. KOPPALA VENKATAMMA, W/O PENCHALAIAH 294. REVURU CHINNAIAH, S/O NARASAIAH 295. TAMBULURU MALLIKARJUNAIAH, S/O PENCHALANARASAIAH 296. KANAGALA SAYAMMA, W/O PENCHALAIAH 297. SOKA GURAVAIAH, S/O TIRUPAIAH 298. SOKA RAMANAMMA, W/O KONDAIAH 299. SOKA PADMAMMA, W/O PENCHALAIAH @ CHINNA 300. KOPPALA ANKAIAH, S/O RAMAIAH 301. POTTEIA RAMANAIAH, S/O POLAIAH 302. ANKUPALLI MAHENDRA, S/O ANKAIAH 303. BIRUDARAJU NARASIMHULU RAJU, S/O PITCHI RAJU 304. PENGANI RAKMINAMMA, W/O PENCHALA REDDY 305. TAMBULURU RAMANAIAH, S/O CHINA PENCHALAIAH 306. TAMBULURU RANGAIAH, S/O PENCHALAIAH @ BOLLAIAH 307. TYDUPATI VENKATAIAH, S/O PAPAIAH 308. TYDUPATI RAMANAMMA, W/O CHINNAIAH 309. TYDUPATI PENCHALA SWAMI, S/O ANKAIAH 310. METTUKURU RAMALINGA REDDY, S/O VENKATARAMI REDDY 311. KADIRI BAKKAMMA, W/O PENCHALAIAH 312. KADIRI PAPAIAH, S/O PENCHALAIAH 313. KOPPALA RAMAIAH, S/O VENKAIAH 15 NJS, J & GTK, J LAAS_65_2015 314. KOPPALA MOHANA, S/O CHINNAIAH 315. KOPPALA CHINNAIAH, S/O NARASAIAH 316. KARIPAM VENKATESWARLU, S/O VENKATAIAH 317. KARIPAM VENKATAIAH, S/O PENCHALAIAH 318. KANUGULA RAMANAMMA, W/O MANIKYAM 319. MIRIYALA VENAKATA SUBBAIAH, S/O VENAKTA KRISHNAIAH 320. RACHAKONDA MALLAMMA, W/O NARASAIAH 321. PARUCHURU PENCHALASUBBAIAH, S/O PENCHALAIAH 322. MIRIYALA NARAYANA, S/O SUBBAIAH @ VENKATASUBBAIAH 323. JADAPALII PENCHALA LAKSHMAMMA, W/O MASTHANAIAH 324. JADAPAILI ANKAMMA, W/O PEDA MASTHANAIAH 325. CHITLURU SRINIVASUIU, S/O VENKATASUBBAIAH @ MUNIRAMALAH 326. MADDE VENGAIAH, S/O. SURAIAH 327. GUMMA SUDHAKAR, S/O. VENKATAIAH 328. GUMMA VENKATAIAH, S/O RANGAIAH 329. PANTHAGIRI ANKAMMA, W/O THIRUPALU 330. RACHAKONDA RATNAMMA, W/O PENCHALA NARASIMHULU 331. PENGANI LAKSHMI NARASAMMA, W/O RANGAPA REDDY 332. PENGANI IAKSHMI NARASAMMA, W/O RANGAPA REDDY 333. MIRLYALA VENKATA KRISHNAIAH, S/O. VENKATA SUBBAIAH 334. MIRLYALA VENKATA KRISHNAIAH, S/O VENKATA SUBBAIAH 335. TAMULURU PENCHALAIAH DIED HIS LR, WIFE PAPAMMA W/O PENCHALAIAH 336. TAMBULURU VENKATANARASAIAH, S/O. NARASAIAH 337. REGIPATI VENKATESWARLU, S/O. NARASAIAH 16 NJS, J & GTK, J LAAS_65_2015 338. KADIRI VENKATESWARIU, S/O CHINA ROSAIAH 339. KONDIPAGU PENCHALAMMA, W/O VENKATESWARIU 340. KADIRI PENCHALAIAH, S/O. JAYARAMAIAH 341. KADIRI VASANTHAMMA LR, W/O LATE LAKSHMI NARASAIAH 342. ALAKUNTA SUBBAMMA, W/O VENKATASWAMY 343. GUNJI CHENCHAIAH, S/O CHENCHAIAH 344. CHALLA RAMANAIAH DIED HIS LR, WIFE SUBBAMMA 345. CHALLA RAMANAIAH DIED HIS LR, WIFE SUBBAMMA 346. KADIRI VENKATA NARASAIAH, S/O CHINA PENCHALAIAH 347. KOTHA NARASAIAH, S/O ANKAIAH 348. KARIPAM MUNUSWAMI, S/O RAMANAIAH 349. KARIPAM RAMANAIAH, S/O MUNUSWAMI 350. POTTELA LAKSHMI NARASAMMA, W/O POLAIAH 351. GUNDAVOLU PAPAIAH, S/O CHINA PAPAIAH 352. RAGIPATI RAMANAIAH, S/O VENKATESWARLU 353. MUTHUKURU ROSAMMA DIED HER LR, SON M. SUBBAIAH 354. PILLI SUBBAMMA, W/O ANKAIAH 355. KAVETI VEMALAMMA, D/O ANKAIAH (CLAIMANTS NO.354 & 355 ARE LRS OF CLAIMANTS NO.75 AND THEY ARE ADDED AS PER ORDER IN IA NO.506/2013 DT.25.6.2013 356. PEDIBOYINA PENCHALA RAMAIAH, S/O. MALLAIAH 357. PEDDIBOYINA PENCHALAIAH, S/O PENCHALA RAMAIAH 358. CHINTHALA VENKATASUBBAMMA, W/O VENKATESWARLU 359. CHINTHAM SAKKU BAI, W/O VENKATESWARLU CLAIMANTS NO.355 & 359 ARE LRS OF CLAIMANTS NO.84 AND THEY ARE ADDED AS PER ORDER IN IA NO.372/2013 DT.25.6.2013 17 NJS, J & GTK, J LAAS_65_2015 360. BODA PENCHALAIAH, S/O SUBBAIAH 361. BODA DASAIAH, S/O SUBBAIAH 362. KANARATHI MANGAMMA, D/O SUBBAIAH ALL ARE RESIDENTS OF GUNDAVOLU VILLAGE, RAPUR MANDAL, SPSR NEILORE DISTRICT. 363. BATHINA SUBBA REDDY, S/O VENGA REDDY AGED 51 YEARS 364. BATHINA SRIDHAR REDDY, S/O VENGA REDDY AGED 48 YEARS 365. BATHINA SURENDRA REDDY, S/O VENGAREDDY AGED 46 YEARS 366. BOMIREDDY SUJATHA, W/O GOPALREDDY AGED 58 YEARS. 367. MALIREDDY PRABHAVATHI, W/O VENKATA RAMI REDDY 56 YEARS 368. VENKELY KUSUMAMBHA, W/O VENKELY SESHA REDDY 369. VENKELY RAVINDRA REDDY, S/O VENKELY SESHA REDDY 370. PATTAMREDDY BHARATHI, W/O GOPAL REDDY AGED 45 YEARS 371. MALIREDDY MANGAMMA, W/O MALIREDDY SANKAR REDDY AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS 372. MALIREDDY VENKATA RAMI REDDY, S/O MALIREDDY SANKAR REDDY AGED AOUT 59 YEARS 373. BATHINA GIRIJA, W/O SUBHA REDDY AGED 47 YEARS 374. MALIREDDY SUBBAMMA, W/O RAMCHANDRA REDDY AGED 67 YEARS 375. MALIREDDY RAJA GOPAL REDDY, S/O RAMACHANDRA REDDY 376. MALIREDDY SANJV REDDY, S/O RAMACHANDRA REDDY AGED 53 YEARS 377. MALIREDDY BHASKAR REDDY, S/O RAMACHANDRA REDDY AGED 48 YEARS 18 NJS, J & GTK, J LAAS_65_2015 378. KUKATI JAYAMMA, W/O CHINA PULLIAH AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS 379. KUKATI SAMBAIAH, S/O CHINA PULLAIAH AGED 35 YEARS 380. AMBATI ESWARAMMA, W/O NARASAIAH AGED 39 YEARS 381. AMBATI RAMANAMMA, D/O PULLAIAH AGED 39 YEARS 382. MEENTHALA MAHESWARI, W/O VENKATESWARLLU 383. TIPPA PARVATHI, W/O NARAYANA AGED 26 YEARS 384. SHAIK MAHEBOOBJAN, W/O SHAIK MASUM SAHEB AGED 45 YEARS 385. SHAIK SHAMEELA, D/O SHAIK MASUM SAHEB AGED 28 YEARS 386. SHAIK MASTHA BASHA, S/O SHAIK MASUM SAHEB AGED 22 YEARS 387. GUNDEVOLU PAPAIAH, S/O REDA MALLAISH AGED 50 YEARS 388. GUNDAVOLU MALLIKARJUNA, S/O PEDA MALLAISH AGED 38 YEARS 389. PILLI RAMANAISH, S/O VEERAMMA AGED 35 YEARS 390. PILLI SUBBAMMA, S/O RAMANAIAH 391. KAVATI RAMANAMMA, W/O LOTI KANNAIAH AGED 48 YEARS LR'S G R. 113 392. KUNCHAM RAMANAMMA, W/O RAJAIAH AGED 45 YEARS 393. KUNCHAM SRINIVASULU, S/O RAJAIAH AGED 22 YEARS 394. SRAVANI, D/O RAJAIAH AGED ABOUT 14 YEARS 395. MALLAMMA, K/O GUNDAVOLU NARASAMMA AGED 36 YEARS 396. GUNDAVOLU BUJJAMMA, W/O PAPAIAH AGED 38 YEARS 397. MULUMUDI SAREDA, D/O BITRAGUNTA RAMANAIH AGED 30 YEARS 398. JOREPALLI SYAMALA, D/O BITRAHUNTA RAMANEISH AGED 26 19 NJS, J & GTK, J LAAS_65_2015 YEARS 399. BITRAGUNTE DAMODHARA, W/O RAMANEISH AGED 45 YEARS 400. BITRAHUNTE KAMODGARA, S/O RAMANEISH AGED 45 YEARS 401. SANKULA ESWAARAIAH, S/O SUBBAMMA AGED 39 YERAS 402. YELAKACHERLA BUJJAMMA, W/O RAMANAIAH AGED 49 YEARS 403. YELAKACHERLA BABULU, W/O RAMANAIAH AGED 27 YEARS 404. SARJAPUDI PENCHALAMMA, D/O RAMANAIEH AGED 32 YEARS 405. KARIPAM RAMANAMMA, D/O RAMANAIEH AGED 28 YEARS 406. KONDIPAGU PUSHPAMMA, W/O SUBBEIAH AGED 52 YEARS 407. KONDIPAHU SUNANDA, D/O SUBBAIAH AGED 34 YEARS 408. BODDIPUDI SUGUNA, W/O SRINIVASULU AGED 36 YEARS 409. THERMATI SUNEETHA, W/O LETI SRINIVASULU AGED 30 YEARS 410. DUMPA HARI REDDY, GRAND S/O RUKMINAMMA 411. CHALLA SUGUNAMMA, /O JAYARAMI REDDY AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS 412. KOPPALA SEKHAR, S/O CHINNAIH AGED 31 YEARS 413. KOPPALA MOHAN, S/O CHINNAIH AGED 37 YEARS 414. VEERADASERI RAMANAMMA, D/O CHINNAIH AGED 39 YEARS 415. SOKA SRIDEVI, D/O CHINNAIH AGED 33 YEARS 416. REVURU CHINNAMMA, D/O CHINNAIH AGED 30 YEARS 417. SANA BUJJAMMA, D/O KANASALA RAMANAMMA AGED 39 YEARS 418. MADDE ESWARAMMA, W/O VENGAIH AGED 62 YEARS 419. GUMMA ESWARAMMA, D/O VENGAIH AGED 44 YEARS 420. MADDE ESWARAIAH, S/O VENGAIAH AGED 40 YEARS 421. KARIPAM RAMANAMMA, D/O MUNESWARI AGED 32 YEARS 20 NJS, J & GTK, J LAAS_65_2015 422. KARIPAM AKHILA, D/O MUNESWARI AGED ABOUT 9 YEARS 423. PIDATHALE BUJJAMMA, D/O LAKSHMI NARASAMMA AGED 29 YEARS 424. PIDATHA VENKATAESH, S/O LAKSHMI NARASAMMA AGED 38 YEARS 425. VELIKICHARLA BUJJAMMA, D/O LAKSHMI NARASAMMA 40 YEARS 426. POTTELA RAMANAISH, S/O LAKSHMI NARASAMMA AGED 59 YEARS 427. DANDOLU SRIDEVI, D/O GADDAM AUDEMMA AGED 55 YEARS 428. BOYALLA VIDYA VIDYAVATHI, D/O GEDDAM AUDEMMA AGED 58 YEARS 429. METTUKURU RAMANAMMA, D/O GEDDAM AUDEMMA AGED 61 YEARS 430. MIRIYALA SRIHARI, S/O LATI M. PERCHALA SUBBAIAH AGED 30 YEARS 431. MIRIYALA SUBBA RAO, S/O LATI M. PENCHALA SUBBAIH AGED 35 YEARS 432. GUNUPATI LAKSHMI, D/O LATI MIRIYALA PERRCHALA SUBBAIAH AGED 44 YEARS 433. MIRIYALA VENKATESWARLU, S/O LATI M. PENCHALA SUBBAIAH AGED 34 YEARS 434. MIRIYALA LAKSHMAMMA, W/O LATI M. PENCHALA SUBBAIAH AGED 66 YEARS 435. CHALLA PEDDA PULLAIAH, S/O CH. CHINNA VENKATA RAMAIAH 436. CHALLA CHINNA PULLAIAH, S/O CH. CHINNA VENKATA RAMAIAH AGED 53 YEARS 437. THAMMISETTI AUDI LAKSHMI, S/O PEDA PENCHALAIAH AGED 61 YEARS 438. KUNCHAM RAMANAIAH, S/O PEDA PENCHALAIAH AGED 61 21 NJS, J & GTK, J LAAS_65_2015 YEARS 439. KUNCHAM PENCHALAIAH, S/O PEDA PENCHALAIAH AGED 50 YEARS 440. TERAKA MANGAMMA, D/O KUNCHAM LAKSHMAMMA AGED 56 YEARS 441. SYED ALTAF, SON IN LOW OF TYDUPATI RAMAIAH 442. SYED ALI AHAMED, GRAND SON OF TYDUPATI RAMAIAH 443. KADIRI PENCHALAMMA, W/O LATI DASARADHA RAMAIAH AGED 36 YEARS 444. KADIRI JAYA PRAKASH, S/O LATI DASARADHA RAMAIAH AGED 10 YEARS 445. KADIRI LAKSHMI, D/O LATI DASARADHA RAMAIAH AGED 13 YEARS 446. KADIRI GANESH, S/O NARASIMHULU AGED 12 YEARS 447. KADIRI VENKATA RAMANAMMA, W/O LATI NARASIMHULU 448. KONDIPAGU VENKATAIAH, S/O LATI NAGAIAH AGED 66 YEARS 449. KONDIPAGU RAMANAIAH, S/O LATI NAGAIAH AGED 57 YEARS 450. VESIPOGU SUSCELAMMA, D/O KONDIPAGU NAGAIAH AGED 42 YEARS 451. THAMBULURU NATARAJ, S/O LATI T. MALLIKARJUNA AGED 10 YEARS 452. THAMBULURU SWARAJ, S/O LATI T. MALLIKARJUNA AGED 37 YEARS 453. THAMBULURU PENCHALAMMA, W/O LATI T. MALLIKARJUNA AGED 37 YEARS 454. MYLUPALLI PENCHALA LAKSHMAMMA, D/O LATI MIRIYALA VENKATA KRISHNAIAH 455. MIRIYALA VENKATA SUBBAIAH, S/O LATI VENKATA KRISHNAIAH 22 NJS, J & GTK, J LAAS_65_2015 456. MIRIYALA LEELAVATHAMMA, W/O LATI VENKATA KRISHNAIAH 457. MYLUPALLI PENCHALA LAKSHAMMA, D/O LATI MIRIYALA VENKATA KRISHNAIAH 458. MIRIYALA VENKATA SUBBAIAH, S/O LATI VENKATA KRISHNAIAH 459. MIRIYALA LEELAVATHAMMA, W/O LATI VENKATA KRISHNAIAH AGED 66 YEARS 460. ALAKUNTA CHENCHU LAKSHMI, D/O GUNJI CHENCHAIAH AGED 29 YEARS 461. GUNJI CHENCHY KRISHNA, S/O LATI CHENCHAIAH AGED 29 YEARS 462. GUNJI CHINA CHENCHAIAH, S/O LATI CHENCHAIAH AGED 34 YEARS 463. GUNJI PEDA RATHNAMMA, W/O LATI CHENCHAIAH AGED 51 YEARS 464. KOTHA PENCHALA NARASAMMA, SISTER OF LATI KADIRI VENKATA NARASAIAH AGED 66 YEARS 465. KADIRI CHANDRAIAH, BROTHER OF LATI KODIRI VENKATA NARASAIAH AGED 65 YEARS 466. AMBATI MADHAVA RAO, S/O LATI NARASAIAH 467. AMBATI NARASAIAH, HUSBAND OF AMBATI ESWARAMMA AGED 59 YEARS RR 427 TO 467 ARE BROUGHT ON RECORD AS LR'S OF DECESSED RESPONDENTS NO. 58, 94, 156,215,227,247,261,285,295,333,334,346AND 380 AS PER COURT ORDER DATED 21.03.18 MEDIN 1 A2/17 468. PENAGANI MOHAN REDDY, S/O LATE MUNIRAMI REDDY AGED 42 TEARS R/O GUNDAVOLU VILLAGE RAPUR MANDALAM SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. R. R468, BROUGHT ON RECORD AS LR OF DECCASED RESPONDENT NO.S 331 AND 332 AS PER COURTORDER DATED 07/07/2023 AMEND IN LAAS 65 OF 2015 IN IA 10/2019 23 NJS, J & GTK, J LAAS_65_2015 469. YAKASIRI CHINNAIAH S/O LATE ANKAIAH LR OF R 68, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, GUNDAVOLU VILLAGE, RAPUR MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 470. YAKASIRI NARASAIAH S/O LATE ANKAIAH LR OF R 68, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, GUNDAVOLU VILLAGE, RAPUR MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. RESPONDENT NOS.469 AND 470 ARE BROUGHT ON RECORD AS LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES OF DECEASED RESPONDENT NO.68 AMENDED AS PER COURT ORDER DATED 07.10.2023 IN I.A. NO.1 OF 2019 IN LAA.S. NO. 65 OF 2015. 471. GUNJI ANKAMMA W/O RATHNAIAH LR OF R 203, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, GUNDAVOLU VILLAGE, RAPUR MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. RESPONDENT NO.471 HAS BROUGHT ON RECORD AS LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE OF DECEASED RESPONDENT NO.203 AMENDED AS PER COURT ORDER DATED 07.10.2023 IN I.A. NO.2 OF 2019 IN LAA.S. NO. 65 OF 2015. 472. ALAKUNTA RAJAIAH S/O LATE ALAKUNTA ANKAIAH LR OF R 103, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, GUNDAVOLU VILLAGE, RAPUR MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 473. GUNJI ANKAMMA D/O LATE ALAKUNTA ANKAIAH LR OF R 103, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, GUNDAVOLU VILLAGE, RAPUR MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 474. MALLA GOVARDHANAMMA D/O LATE ALAKUNTA ANKAIAH LR OF R 103, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, GUNDAVOLU VILLAGE, RAPUR MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. RESPONDENT NOS.472 TO 474 ARE BROUGHT ON RECORD AS LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES OF DECEASED RESPONDENT NO.103 AMENDED AS PER COURT ORDER DATED 07.10.2023 IN I.A. NO.3 OF 2019 IN LAA.S. NO. 65 OF 2015. 475. ALAKUNTA VENKATAMMA W/O VENKATAIAH LR OF R 109, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, GUNDAVOLU VILLAGE, RAPUR MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 476. ALAKUNTA PARAMDAMAIAH S/O VENKATAIAH LR OF R 109, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, GUNDAVOLU VILLAGE, RAPUR 24 NJS, J & GTK, J LAAS_65_2015 MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. RESPONDENT NO.475 AND 476 ARE BROUGHT ON RECORD AS LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES OF DECEASED RESPONDENT NO.109 AMENDED AS PER COURT ORDER DATED 07.10.2023 IN I.A. NO.4 OF 2019 IN LAA.S. NO. 65 OF 2015. 477. GUNJI DHANAMMA D/O LATE ALAKUNTA RAMAIAH LR OF R 206, W/O. KRISHNAIAH, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, GUNDAVOLU VILLAGE, RAPUR MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. RESPONDENT NO.477 HAS BROUGHT ON RECORD AS LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE OF DECEASED RESPONDENT NO.206 AMENDED AS PER COURT ORDER DATED 07.10.2023 IN I.A. NO.6 OF 2019 IN LAA.S. NO. 65 OF 2015. 478. ALAKUNTA CHENCHYLAKSHMI D/O GUNJI RAMAIAH LR OF R 100, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, GUNDAVOLU VILLAGE, RAPUR MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 479. GUNJI KRISHNAIAH S/O GUNJI RAMAIAH LR OF R 100, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, GUNDAVOLU VILLAGE, RAPUR MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 480. GUNJI CHENCHAIAH S/O GUNJI RAMAIAH LR OF R 100, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, GUNDAVOLU VILLAGE, RAPUR MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 481. BANDI SANTHAMMA W/O LATE VENKATAPATHY LR OF R 100, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, GUNDAVOLU VILLAGE, RAPUR MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. RESPONDENT NO.478 TO 481 ARE BROUGHT ON RECORD AS LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES OF DECEASED RESPONDENT NO.100 AMENDED AS PER COURT ORDER DATED 07.10.2023 IN I.A. NO.7 OF 2019 IN LAA.S. NO. 65 OF 2015. 482. MALIREDDY JANARDHAN REDDY, S/O. LATE LATE MALIREDDY RATHNAMMA, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/O GUNDAVOLU VILLAGE, RAPUR MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 483. CHENNAREDDY KARUNA REDDY, D/O. LATE MALIREDDY RATHNAMMA, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, R/O GUNDAVOLU VILLAGE, RAPUR MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT 25 NJS, J & GTK, J LAAS_65_2015 484. THIKKAVARAPU SUNEETHA, S/O. LATE MALIREDDY RATHNAMMA , AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, R/O OF GUNDAVOLU VILLAGE, RAPUR MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 485. MADAMALA DASARADHA RAMI REDDY, S/O LATE PITCHI REDDY, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, R/O GUNDAVOLU VILLAGE, RAPUR MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 486. KOTTAREDDY PRAMEELA, . D/O LATE PITCHI REDDY, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, R/O GUNDAVOLU VILLAGE, RAPUR MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 487. MARREDDI SUBASHINI, D/O LATE PITCHI REDDY, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, R/O GUNDAVOLU VILLAGE, RAPUR MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 488. MADAMALA RATHNAMMA, W/O LATE MADAMALA SUDHAKARA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, R/O GUNDAVOLU VILLAGE, RAPUR MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 489. MADAMALA NIVEDITHA, D/O LATE MADAMALA SUDHAKARA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, R/O GUNDAVOLU VILLAGE, RAPUR MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 490. MALIREDDY ANITHA, W/O LATE MALIREDDY RAJENDRA PRASAD REDDY, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, R/O GUNDAVOLU VILLAGE, RAPUR MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 491. MALIREDDY HARSHITHA, D/O LATE MALIREDDY RAJENDRA PRASAD REDDY, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, R/O GUNDAVOLU VILLAGE, RAPUR MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 492. MALIREDDY SIVA NARAYANA REDDY, S/O LATE MALIREDDY RAJENDRA PRASAD REDDY, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, R/O GUNDAVOLU VILLAGE, RAPUR MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 493. GADDAM VENKATESWARA REDDY, S/O LATE GADDAM RAMI REDDY, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, R/O GUNDAVOLU VILLAGE, RAPUR MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 26 NJS, J & GTK, J LAAS_65_2015 494. GADDAM ESWARA REDDY, , S/O LATE GADDAM RAMI REDDY, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, R/O GUNDAVOLU VILLAGE, RAPUR MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 495. GADDAM SREENUVASULU REDDY, , S/O LATE GADDAM RAMI REDDY, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, R/O GUNDAVOLU VILLAGE, RAPUR MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 496. GADDAM PRASAD, , S/O LATE GADDAM RAMI REDDY, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, R/O GUNDAVOLU VILLAGE, RAPUR MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 497. GADDAM VENKATA REDDY, S/O LATE GADDAM RAMI REDDY, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/O GUNDAVOLU VILLAGE, RAPUR MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 498. CHALLA SUBBAMMA, W/O LATE CHALLA RATHNAIAH, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, R/O GUNDAVOLU VILLAGE, RAPUR MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 499. BELLAMKONDA BHARATHI, D/O LATE CHALLA RATHNAIAH, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, R/O GUNDAVOLU VILLAGE, RAPUR MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 500. CHALLA SURENDRA, S/O LATE CHALLA RATHNAIAH, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, R/O GUNDAVOLU VILLAGE, RAPUR MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT 501. CHALLA MADHAV, , S/O LATE CHALLA RATHNAIAH, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, R/O GUNDAVOLU VILLAGE, RAPUR MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT 502. BITRAGUNTA JAYAMMA, W/O LATE BITRAGUNTA ESWARAIAH, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, R/O GUNDAVOLU VILLAGE, RAPUR MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 503. BITRAGUNTA SIVA SANKAR, S/O LATE BITRAGUNTA ESWARAIAH, AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS, R/O GUNDAVOLU VILLAGE, RAPUR MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 504. ANKUPALLI PARVATHI, D/O LATE BITRAGUNTA ESWARAIAH, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, R/O GUNDAVOLU VILLAGE, RAPUR MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 27 NJS, J & GTK, J LAAS_65_2015 505. THIRUMURU UMAMAMAHESWARI, D/O LATE BITRAGUNTA ESWARAIAH, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, R/O GUNDAVOLU VILLAGE, RAPUR MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 506. DAGGUMATI VENKATA SUBBA RAO, , S/O LATE DAGGUMATI KRISHNA MURTHY, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/O GUNDAVOLU VILLAGE, RAPUR MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 507. S PADMAJA, D/O LATE DAGGUMATI KRISHNA MURTHY, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, R/O GUNDAVOLU VILLAGE, RAPUR MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 508. DAGGUMATI VENKATA SRINIVASULU, S/O LATE DAGGUMATI KRISHNA MURTHY, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, R/O GUNDAVOLU VILLAGE, RAPUR MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 509. BADA BHULAKSHMI, W/O LATE BADA RAMASWAMY, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, R/O. GUNDAVOLU VILLAGE, RAPUR MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 510. BADA MAHESH, S/O LATE BADA RAMASWAMY, AGED ABOUT 22 YEARS, R/O. GUNDAVOLU VILLAGE, RAPUR MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 511. BADA SRAVANI, , D/O LATE BADA RAMASWAMY, AGED ABOUT 21 YEARS, R/O. GUNDAVOLU VILLAGE, RAPUR MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 512. GANGODI MANOHAR, ,S/O LATE GANGODI RAMANAIAH, AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS, R/O GUNDAVOLU VILLAGE, RAPUR MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 513. GANGODI MURALI, S/O LATE GANGODI RAMANAIAH, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/O GUNDAVOLU VILLAGE, RAPUR MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 514. SANNIBOINA MAYURI, D/O LATE GANGODI RAMANAIHA, AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS, R/O GUNDAVOLU VILLAGE, RAPUR MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 515. GANGODI VIJAYALAKSHMI, W/O LATE GANGODI MURALI, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, R/O GUNDAVOLU VILLAGE, RAPUR MANDAL, 28 NJS, J & GTK, J LAAS_65_2015 SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 516. GANGODI DIVYA, D/O LATE GANGODI MURALI, AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS, R/O GUNDAVOLU VILLAGE, RAPUR MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 517. GANGODI MAHESH, , W/O LATE GANGODI MURALI, AGED ABOUT 21 YEARS, R/O GUNDAVOLU VILLAGE, RAPUR MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 518. AKILI RATHNAMMA, W/O LATE AKILI RAMANA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, R/O GUNDAVOLU VILLAGE, RAPUR MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 519. DOTHIREDDDY APARNA, , D/O LATE AKILI RAMANA REDDY AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, R/O GUNDAVOLU VILLAGE, RAPUR MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 520. THALLA BHAVANI, 520 MOLAKALA SRIDEVI D/O LATE AKILI RAMANA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/O. GUNDAVOLU VILLAGE, RAPUR MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 521. ADANAPU DASARADHA RAMAIAH, , S/O LATE MALLAIAH, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, R/O GUNDAVOLU VILLAGE, RAPUR MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 522. PEDDIBOINA ESWARAMMA, D/O LATE MALLAIAH, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, R/O. GUNDAVOLU VILLAGE, RAPUR MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 523. DAVARALA MAHESWARI, D/O LATE MALLAIAH, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, R/O. GUNDAVOLU VILLAGE, RAPUR MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 524. MATTERM UNAMAHESWARI, D/O LATE MALLAIAH, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, R/O. GUNDAVOLU VILLAGE, RAPUR MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 525. KONDIPOGU RAGHAMMA, W/O LATE KONDIPOGU RAMANAIAH, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, R/O GUNDAVOLU VILLAGE, RAPUR MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 526. THUMATI AMARAVATHI, D/O LATE KONDIPOGU RAMANAAIAH, 29 NJS, J & GTK, J LAAS_65_2015 AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, R/O GUNDAVOLU VILLAGE, RAPUR MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 527. KONDIPOGU VENKATA RAMANAIAH, , S/O LATE KONDIPOGU RAMANAIAH, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, R/O GUNDAVOLU VILLAGE, RAPUR MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 528. SASAM MAMATHA, D/O LATE KONDIPOGU RAMANAIAH, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, R/O GUNDAVOLU VILLAGE, RAPUR MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 529. KONDIPOGU RAVI KUMAR, , S/O LATE KONDIPOGU RAMANAIAH, AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS, R/O GUNDAVOLU VILLAGE, RAPUR MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 530. BIRUDARAJU VISHNU VARDHAN, , S/O BIRUDURAJU NARASIMHA RAJU, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, R/O GUNDAVOLU VILLAGE, RAPUR MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 531. PEDDIBOINA PENCHALAIAH, S/O LATE PEDDIBOINA PENHALA RAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS, R/O GUNDAVOLU VILLAGE, RAPUR MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 532. CHINTHALA SUBBAMMA, D/O LATE PEDDIBOINA PENHALA RAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, R/O GUNDAVOLU VILLAGE, RAPUR MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 533. CHINTHAM SAKKUBAI, D/O LATE PEDDIBOINA PENHALA RAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, R/O GUNDAVOLU VILLAGE, RAPUR MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 534. MADDE VASUMATHI, , W/O LATE MADDE ESWARAIAH, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, R/O GUNDAVOLU VILLAGE, RAPUR MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 535. MADDE SIVA TEJA, S/O LATE MADDE ESWARAIAH, AGED ABOUT 18 YEARS, R/O GUNDAVOLU VILLAGE, RAPUR MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 536. MADDE KAVYA D, /O MADDE ESWARAIAH, AGED ABOUT 21 YEARS, R/O GUNDAVOLU VILLAGE, RAPUR MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 30 NJS, J & GTK, J LAAS_65_2015 537. MIRIYALA VENKATA SUBBAIAH, S/O LATE VENKATA KRISHNAIAH, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, R/O GUNDAVOLU VILLAGE, RAPUR MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 538. MYLUPALLI PENCHALA LAKSHMAMMA, , D/O LATE VENKATA KRISHNAIAH, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/O GUNDAVOLU VILLAGE, RAPUR MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 539. THIRAKALA PADMA, , D/O LATE PANCHETI SREENIVASULU, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, R/O GUNDAVOLU VILLAGE, RAPUR MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 540. JADAPALLI SRIDEVI, D/O LATE PANCHETI SREENIVASULU, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/O GUNDAVOLU VILLAGE, RAPUR MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 541. THALLA HAIMAVATHI, D/O LATE PANCHETI SREENIVASULU, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, R/O GUNDAVOLU VILLAGE, RAPUR MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 542. PANCHETI SIVA PRASAD, D/O LATE PANCHETI SREENIVASULU AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, R/O GUNDAVOLU VILLAGE, RAPUR MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 543. THALLA BHAVANI, THALLA BHAVANI D/O LATE PANCHETI SREENIVASULU AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, R/O. GUNDAVOLU VILLAGE, RAPUR MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 544. KOPPALA BUJJAMMA, , W/O LATE KOPPALA RAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS, D.NO. 21-14, R/O GUNDAVOLU VILLAGE, RAPUR MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 545. REVORU ANKAMMA, , D/O LATE KOPPALA RAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, R/O GUNDAVOLU VILLAGE, RAPUR MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 546. KOPPALA ANKAIAH, S/O LATE KOPPALA RAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, R/O D.NO. 21-14, R/O GUNDAVOLU VILLAGE, RAPUR MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. RESPONDENT NOS.482 TO 501 ARE BROUGHT ON RECORD AS LRS OF DECEASED RESPONDENT NOS. 3, 4, 7, 8, 37, 16, 124, 149, 153, 167, 170, 189, 210, 303, 356, 420, 456, 459, 174 AND 31 NJS, J & GTK, J LAAS_65_2015 313 VIDE COURT ORDER DATED 12 .09.2024 IN I.A.NO.3, 4, 7, 10, 13, 16, 19, 22, 25, 28, 31, 34, 37, 40, 43, 46, 49, 52 AND 55 OF 2024 IN A.S.NO.65 OF 2015 RESPECTIVELY 547. KUKATI SIVARAMAIAH, S/O. LATE KUKATI PEDDA PULLAIAH, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, R/O. GUNDAVOLU VILLAGE, RAPUR MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 548. KUKATI DASARADHA RAMAIAH, S/O. LATE KUKATI PEDDA PULLAIAH, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, R/O. GUNDAVOLU VILLAGE, RAPUR MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 549. KUKATI MAHESWARA, S/O. LATE KUKATI PEDDA PULLAIAH, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/O. GUNDAVOLU VILLAGE, RAPUR MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 550. KURAPATI PADMAVATHI, D/O. LATE KARUPATI VISALAKSHMAMMA, ALIAS KURAPATI LASHMAMMA, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, R/O. GUNDAVOLU VILLAGE, RAPUR MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 551. KURAPATI PENCHALAIAH, S/O. LATE KARUPATI VISALAKSHMAMMA, ALIAS KURAPATI LASHMAMMA, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, R/O. GUNDAVOLU VILLAGE, RAPUR MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 552. K CHANDRA SEKHAR, S/O. LATE KARUPATI VISALAKSHMAMMA, ALIAS KURAPATI LASHMAMMA, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, R/O. GUNDAVOLU VILLAGE, RAPUR MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 553. GAVARRAJU BHAVANI KUMARI, D/O. LATE KARUPATI VISALAKSHMAMMA KURAPATI LASHMAMMA, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, R/O. GUNDAVOLU VILLAGE, RAPUR MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 554. KADIRI VENKATA KRISHNAIAH, S/O. LATE KADIRI POLAMMA, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, R/O. GUNDAVOLU VILLAGE, RAPUR MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 555. PALEPU RAMANAMMA, D/O. S/O. LATE KADIRI POLAMMA, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, R/O. GUNDAVOLU VILLAGE, RAPUR MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 32 NJS, J & GTK, J LAAS_65_2015 556. POTTELLA RAJAMMA, D/O. S/O. LATE KADIRI POLAMMA, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, R/O. GUNDAVOLU VILLAGE, RAPUR MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 557. KARIPAM NARASAMMA, D/O. S/O. LATE KADIRI POLAMMA, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/O. GUNDAVOLU VILLAGE, RAPUR MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 558. KOTAMREDDY AMARAVATHI, D/O. KOTAMREDDY RAJAGOPAL REDDY, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, R/O. GUNDAVOLU VILLAGE, RAPUR MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 559. KOTAMREDDY VARALAKSHMI, D/O. KOTAMREDDY RAJAGOPAL REDDY, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, R/O. GUNDAVOLU VILLAGE, RAPUR MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT 560. KADIRI VENKATA SWAMI, S/O. LATE KADIRI CHINNA ROSAIH, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, GUNDAVOLU VILLAGE, RAPUR MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 561. KADIRI VENKATESWARLU, S/O. LATE KADIRI CHINNA ROSAIH, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, GUNDAVOLU VILLAGE, RAPUR MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 562. MALLAVARAM VENKATAMMA, D/O. LATE KADIRI CHINNA ROSAIH, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, GUNDAVOLU VILLAGE, RAPUR MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 563. KONDIPAGU RAGAMMA, D/O. LATE KADIRI CHINNA ROSAIH, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, GUNDAVOLU VILLAGE, RAPUR MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 564. PELLURU ANUSUYAMMA, W/O. LATE PELLURU PULLAIAH, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, R/O. GUNDAVOLU VILLAGE, RAPUR MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 565. PELLURU PENCHALA SWAMY, S/O. LATE PELLURU PULLAIAH, R/O. GUNDAVOLU VILLAGE, RAPUR MANDAL,SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 566. PELLURU PRASANNA, D/O. LATE PELLURU PULLAIAH, R/O. GUNDAVOLU VILLAGE, RAPUR MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. RESPONDENT NOS. 547 TO 566 ARE BROUGHT ON RECORD AS LRS OF DECEASED RESPONDENT NOS. 139, 86, 33 NJS, J & GTK, J LAAS_65_2015 263, 259, 249, 104 VIDE COURT ORDER DATED 02.01.2025 IN I.A.NOS.69, 72, 75, 77,80, 83 OF 2024 RESPECTIVELY IN L.A.A.S.NO.65 OF 2015. 567. GUNJI LAKSHMAMMA, 567 (LR OF R.165), W/O. LATE LAKSHMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, GUNDAVOLU VILLAGE, RAPUR (M) NELLORE DISTRICT. PETITIONERS/ PROPOSED LRS OF DECEASED RESPONDENT NO. 165 568. ADDANAPU PENCHALA LAKSHMAMMA LR OF R 320, W/O. W/O VENKATARATHNIAH, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, GUNDAVOLU VILLAGE, RAPUR MANDAL NELLORE DISTRICT. 569. RACHAKONDA PENCHALAIAH LR OF R 320, , W/O NARASAIAH, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, GUNDAVOLU VILLAGE, RAPUR MANDAL NELLORE DISTRICT. 570. RACHAKONDA PENCHALA NARASIMHULU LR OF 320, W/O NARASAIAH, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, GUNDAVOLU VILLAGE, RAPUR MANDAL NELLORE DISTRICT. 571. RACHAKONDA PENCHALASWAMY LR OF R 320, W/O NARASAIAH, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, GUNDAVOLU VILLAGE, RAPUR MANDAL, NELLORE DISTRICT. PETITIONERS/ PROPOSED LRS OF DECEASED RESPONDENT NO. 320 572. KADIRI PENCHALA NARASAIAH LR OF R 290, S/O KONDAIAH, @ PONDAIAH, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, GUNDAVOLU VILLAGE, RAPUR MANDAL, NELLORE DISTRICT. 573. KOTHA BUJJAMMA LR OF 290, W/O LAKSHMINARASAIAH, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, CHAVATAPALLI VILLAGE, RAPUR MANDAL, NELLORE DISTRICT. 574. KARIPAM RAMAMMA LR OF R 290, D/O KONDAIAH, @ PONDAIAH, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, SAIDADUPALLI VILLAGE, RAPUR MANDAL, NELLORE DISTRICT 575. KADIRI KRISHNAIAH LR OF R 290, S/O KONDAIAH @ PONDAIAH, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, GUNDAVOLU VILLAGE, RAPUR MANDAL, NELLORE DISTRICT. 576. KOMMALA PADMA LR OF R 290, D/O KONDAIAH, @ PONDAIAH, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, KALUVOYA VILLAGE, AND 34 NJS, J & GTK, J LAAS_65_2015 MANDAL NELLORE DISTRICT. 577. KONDIPOGU NARASAMMA LR OF R 290, D/O KONDAIAH @ PONDAIAH AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, SAIDADUPALLI VILLAGE, RAPUR MANDAL , NELLORE DISTRICT. 578. NIPTLAPALLI SAMPOORNA LR OF R 290, D/O KONDAIAH, @ PONDAIAH, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, KOTHA KAMBALAPALLI, PODALAKUR MANDAL, NELLORE DISTRICT. PETITIONERS/ PROPOSED LRS OF DECEASED RESPONDENT NO. 290) 579. KOTHA RAMANAMMA LR OF R 311, D/O BAKKAMMA AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, KANUPURUPALLI VILLAGE, KALUVYA MANDAL, NELLORE DISTRICT 580. KADIRI PAPAIAH LR OF 311, S/O PENCHALAIAH, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, GUNDAVOLU VILLAGE, RAPUR MANDAL, NELLORE DISTRICT. 581. KADIRI PENCHALANARASAIAH LR OF 311, W/O PENCHALAIAH, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, GUNDAVOLU VILLAGE, RAPUR MANDAL, NELLORE DISTRICT. 582. GADDALA PENCHALAMMA LR OF R 311, W/O PEDA VEEMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, ALTHURUPADU VILLAGE, DAKKKILI MANDAL, NELLORE DISTRICT. PETITIONERS/ PROPOSED LRS OF DECEASED RESPONDENT NO. 311) RESPONDENT NOS . 567 TO 582 ARE BROUGHT ON RECORD AS LRS OF DECEASED RESPONDENT NOS. 165, 320 290, 311 VIDE COURT ORDER DATED 30.01.2025 IN I.A.NOS.58 61,62 AND 66 OF 2024 RESPECTIVELY IN L.A.A.S.NO.65 OF 2015. 583. DANTALA SARADA, D/O CHANDALURU JAYAMMA AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS GUNDAVOLU VILLAGE RAPUR MANDAL SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 584. BUDIDAVAKAM PRAMEELA, D/O CHANDALURU JAYAMMA AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS GUNDAVOLU VILLAGE RAPUR MANDAL SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 585. THANDRA ARUNA, D/O CHANDALURU JAYAMMA AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS GUNDAVOLU VILLAGE RAPUR SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 35 NJS, J & GTK, J LAAS_65_2015 586. SADHANA RENUKA, D/O CHANDALURU JAYAMMA AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS GUNDAVOLU VILLAGE RAPUR SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. . PROPOSED RESPONDENTS/LEGAL HEIRS OF RESPONDENT NO 185. 587. MUTHUKURU SUBBAIAH, S/O RAMAIAH AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS GUNDAVOLU VILLAGE RAPUR MANDAL SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 588. MUTHUKURU NARASIMHULU, S/O RAMAIAH AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, GUNDAVOLU VILLAGE RAPUR MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT 589. MUTHUKURU KILLAR, S/O RAMAIAH AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS GUNDAVOLU VILLAGE RAPUR MANDAL SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 590 REDDYBAGU CHINNA SUBBAMMA D/O RAMAIAH GUNDAVOLU VILLAGE RAPUR MANDAL SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. PROPOSED RESPONDENTS/LEGAL HEIRS OF RESPONDENT NO 257. RESPONDENT NOS. 583 TO 586 AND 587 TO 590 ARE BROUGHT ON RECORD AS LRS OF DECEASED RESPONDENT NOS 185, AND 257 VIDE COURT ORDER DATED 27.03.2025 IN I.A.NO.3 OF 2025 AND IN I.A NO. 6 OF 2025 IN L.A.A.S.NO.65 OF 2015. 590. REDDYBAGU CHINNA SUBBAMMA, D/O RAMAIAH GUNDAVOLU VILLAGE RAPUR MANDAL SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Appellant: 1. THE ADVOCATE GENERAL (AP) Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. Mr.CHETLURU SREENIVAS 2. Mr.M.DASARADHA RAMI REDDY Judgment Reserved on : 25.09.2025 Judgment Pronounced on : 22.12.2025 Judgment Uploaded on : 23.12.2025 36 NJS, J & GTK, J LAAS_65_2015 The Court made the following JUDGMENT: (Per NJSJ) The State aggrieved by the Order dated 22.09.2014 in LAOP No.1 of 2011 on the file of the Court of the V Additional District Judge And Sessions Judge-Cum-Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Nellore, filed the present Appeal. 2) For better appreciation of the case, the parties are referred to as they are arrayed in the L.A.O.P. 3) Heard Mr.T.Vishnu Teja, learned Special Government Pleader, attached to the office of the learned Advocate General. Also heard Mr.K.G.Krishna Murthy, learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents and Mr.Chetluru Srinivas, learned counsel for the review petitioner in I.A.No.1 of 2023. Perused the material on record. 4) For the purpose of Kandaleru Project a Notification under Section 4 (1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short ―the Act‖) was issued on 01.05.2007. Subsequently, a Draft Declaration under Section 6 of the Act was published. Pursuant to the said Draft Notification, the structures and wells of the respondents / claimants situated in Gundavolu Village of Rapur Mandal were acquired. The Land Acquisition Officer after conducting enquiry, passed Award No.2/2009-10, dated 18.05.2009 determining the compensation / value of the structures etc., by taking into consideration its nature and the plinth area. 5) Aggrieved by the value / compensation fixed by the LAO, the respondents / claimants while receiving the same under protest, invoked 37 NJS, J & GTK, J LAAS_65_2015 Section 18 of the Act. Before the Reference Court on behalf of the respondents / claimants PWs 1 to 3 were examined and Exs.A1 and A2 were marked. On behalf of the Referring Officer, R.W.1 was examined and Ex.B1 i.e., Award dated 18.05.2009 was marked. The learned Reference Court vide order under appeal enhanced the market value of the structures per sq.mtr., by 150% over and above the market value fixed by the LAO. It had also granted the statutory benefits on the enhanced market value. 6) Mr.Vishnu Teja, learned counsel for the appellant made elaborate submissions contending that the order under appeal is unsustainable, contrary to law and liable to be set aside. He submits that the enhancement of market value by the Reference Court is highly excessive, without any valid basis and therefore liable to be interfered with. He also contends that the Reference Court on an erroneous appreciation of the matter went wrong in coming to a conclusion that the value fixed by the LAO for the structures is improper and arbitrary. He submits that the LAO determined the market value on the basis of the estimates prepared by the Engineering Wing of the Irrigation and Power Department, whereas the estimates (Ex.A1) relied on by the respondent / claimants were prepared by a private Civil Engineer, and the learned Reference Court has committed grievous error in relying on Ex.A1 for enhancement of the market value. He also contends that in Land Acquisition matters the Court is required to fix just and reasonable compensation, whereas in the present case, the Reference Court enhanced the Market Value of the structures by 150% over and above Market Value fixed by the 38 NJS, J & GTK, J LAAS_65_2015 LAO, without assigning any reasons and therefore, the said enhancement warrants interference by the Appellate Court. 7) The learned Special Government Pleader further submits that the LAO fixed the market value of the structures on the basis of estimates prepared by Engineering Wing of Irrigation and Power Department, the same were not filed along with the Award copy (Ex.B1). He submits that the said estimates are very much essential for arriving at just and reasonable compensation. Therefore, the same are filed as additional material in the connected appeal. He also contends that a bare perusal of Ex.A1 would disclose the irregularities / mischief committed by the private Engineer (PW2) in preparing the estimates. In the light of the additional evidence, and as the determination of the market value by the learned Reference Court by 150% per square meter over and above the market value fixed by the LAO is not sustainable, he urges for remand of the matter by duly setting aside the order under Appeal. 8) Per contra, Mr.K.G.Krishna Murthy, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the respondents / claimants strenuously contended that the order of Reference Court is valid and the conclusions recorded therein are arrived at on thorough appreciation of evidence on record and, therefore, the same warrants no interference by this Court. Referring to the relevant depositions of the witnesses and the documentary evidence available on record, the learned counsel would submit that the respondents in fact claimed 300% more over and above the market value fixed by the LAO, but the Reference Court enhanced the market value of the structures only 150% over and above the 39 NJS, J & GTK, J LAAS_65_2015 value fixed by the LAO. He submits that fixation of the market value on the basis of the estimates prepared by Engineering Wing of Irrigation and Power Department, which is filed as additional evidence is not correct as the same cannot be a valid basis for determination of the market value. In elaboration, he submits that the said estimates were prepared by the beneficiary Department, whereas as per the Government Orders in G.O.Ms.No.291, dated 05.08.1982, R&B Department was required to prepare estimates for determination of the market value. That apart, the learned Senior Counsel contends that even the said estimates which are sought to be received as additional evidence are very much available at the time of adjudication of the matter by the Reference Court and having failed to adduce evidence at the relevant point of time, the appellant cannot be permitted to refer to the same in a casual manner and the same cannot be looked into. 9) The learned Senior Counsel further contends that the present appeal was filed in the year 2015 and after long lapse of time, that too in the middle of the arguments, the Interlocutory Application seeking to receive the additional evidence was filed only in the other appeal and further that it is settled Law that such an application cannot be allowed unless the requirements stipulated in Order 41 Rule 27 (1) (aa) of CPC are fulfilled. He submits that no application is filed much less with an affidavit stating that the additional material / evidence was not within the knowledge of the deponent or that the same could not, even after exercise of due diligence, be produced at the time of consideration of the O.P., by the learned Reference Court. In essence, his 40 NJS, J & GTK, J LAAS_65_2015 contention is that as the estimates prepared by the Engineering Wing of Irrigation and Power Department are very much available with the LAO, therefore such evidence / material cannot be said to be not within the knowledge of the Department or that the same could not be produced after exercise of due diligence, at the time of examination of the claim for enhancement by the Reference Court. He, therefore, submits that reference to the additional material is of no avail to the appellant. He further contends that the appeal is devoid of merits and the market value enhanced by the Reference Court is just and reasonable. He urges for dismissal of the appeal. 10) In reply, the learned Government Pleader made submissions with reference to the decisions of the Hon’ble Supreme Court reported in Sanjay Kumar Singh Vs State of Jharkhand1 ; Shalimar Chemical Works Ltd., Vs Surendra Oil and Dal Mills (Refineries) and Ors., 2 and Malayalam Plantations Ltd., Vs State of Kerala and Another3, and prays for allowing the appeal and to remand the matter for determination of the market value, afresh by the Reference Court. 11) On an appreciation of the rival contentions, the points that arise for adjudication by this Court are – 1) Whether the market value fixed by the Reference Court is not just, or reasonable, highly excessive, without valid basis 1 (2022) 7 SCC 247 2 (2010) 8 SCC 423 3 (2010) 13 SCC 487 41 NJS, J & GTK, J LAAS_65_2015 and as such, the order under appeal is liable to be interfered with? 2) Whether a case is made out for remand as prayed for? 3) To what relief? 12) Before dealing with Point No.1, it is deemed appropriate to consider the contentions addressed by the learned counsel on both sides with reference to Point No.2 and answer the same. Point No.2: 13) The basic facts with reference to the purpose of acquisition and the issuance of Section 4 (1) Notification dated 01.05.2007 and passing of Award dated 18.05.2009 (Ex.B1) are not in dispute. It is also not in dispute that against the order of the Reference Court dated 22.09.2014, the present appeal was preferred in the year 2015. More than 10 years have gone by and the application I.A.No.1 of 2025 to receive additional evidence was filed under Order 41 Rule 27 (1)(aa) of CPC on 21.01.2020 during the course of hearing. Be that as it may. 14) Order 41 of CPC deals with appeals from original decrees. 15) Order 41, Rule 27 of CPC deals with production of additional evidence in appellate Court. For ready reference, the same is extracted hereunder: 27. Production of additional evidence in Appellate Court.—(1) The parties to an appeal shall not be entitled to produce additional evidence, whether oral or documentary, in the Appellate Court. But if- (a) the Court from whose decree the appeal is preferred has refused to admit evidence which ought to have been admitted, or 42 NJS, J & GTK, J LAAS_65_2015 (aa) the party seeking to produce additional evidence, establishes that notwithstanding the exercise of due diligence, such evidence was not within his knowledge or could not, after the exercise of due diligence, be produced by him at the time when the decree appealed against was passed, or (b) the Appellate Court requires any document to be produced or any witness to be examined to enable it to pronounce judgment, or for any other substantial cause, the Appellate Court may allow such evidence or document to be produced, or witness to be examined. (2) Wherever additional evidence is allowed to be produced by an Appellate Court, the Court shall record the reason for its admission.‖ 16) A reading of the above extracted provision of law i.e., Rule 27(1)(aa), makes it clear that the party, who is seeking to produce additional evidence, has to establish that despite exercise of due diligence, such evidence was not within the knowledge or that the same could not, after the exercise of due diligence could not be produced by him, at the time when the decree appealed against was passed. 17) In the present case, it is not in dispute that the documents / estimates filed as additional material / evidence in the connected appeal are very much within the knowledge of the department / authorities i.e., LAO/Special Deputy Collector and it is not as if even after exercise of due diligence the said evidence was not within the knowledge of the appellant or that the same could not be produced after exercise of due diligence, much less that it was obtained after exercise of due diligence from the custody of the other department. It may be pertinent to mention here that in fact, in the order 43 NJS, J & GTK, J LAAS_65_2015 under challenge this aspect of not filing / exhibiting the estimates, which are prepared by the engineering team of Irrigation and Power Department, which is stated to be the basis for determination of Market Value by the LAO, non- examination of the Engineer who prepared the same were specifically discussed by the learned Reference Court. However, the appellant did not choose to file any application to receive the additional evidence along with appeal filed in the year 2015, much less a separate application in the present case, like in the connected appeal. Though no specific time limit is stipulated for filing application under Order 41 Rule 27 of CPC, the application to receive additional evidence, cannot be ordered, unless the Court is satisfied that the reasons / explanation for non-production of the evidence sought to be received is established in terms of Order 41 Rule 27(1)(aa) of CPC. In the case on hand, the question of the evidence i.e., the estimates prepared by the Irrigation and Power Department is not within the knowledge of the Department / appellant or that even after exercise of due diligence could not be produced before the Reference Court does not arise at all. 18) At this juncture, it is also relevant to refer to the decisions on which reliance is placed by the learned counsel for the appellant, in the connected appeal. 19) In Sanjay Kumar Singh’s case (referred to supra), the Hon’ble Supreme court was dealing with an order passed by the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi in a First Appeal arising out of the proceedings under the Land Acquisition Act. Reference under Section 18 of the Act was rejected and 44 NJS, J & GTK, J LAAS_65_2015 aggrieved by the same, the original claimant / land owner preferred an appeal before the High Court. He also moved an application to receive the additional evidence under Order 41, Rule 27 of CPC and while deciding the appeal, the High Court dismissed the said application. The Hon’ble Supreme Court while opining that the appellate Court should not travel outside the record of the lower court and cannot take any evidence in appeal and Order 41, Rule 27 of CPC, as an exception enables the appellate Court to take additional evidence in exceptional circumstances, that the appellate Court may permit additional evidence if the conditions laid down in the said Rule are found to exist and the parties are not entitled, as of right, to the admission of such evidence, observed that where the additional evidence sought to be adduced removes the cloud of doubt over the case and the evidence has a direct and important bearing on the main issue in the suit and interest of justice clearly renders it imperative that it may be allowed to be permitted on record, such an application may be allowed. 20) In the case on hand, as noted earlier, no application to receive the additional evidence was filed like in the connected appeal under Order 41 Rule 27(1) (aa) of CPC. Even if such an application is made, the Court is required to see whether the material sought to be received as additional evidence, could not be produced at the time of the proceedings before the Reference Court at the first instance as it was not within the knowledge of the party i.e., the appellant-State herein or that despite exercise of due diligence, the same could not be produced by it, at the time when the decree appealed 45 NJS, J & GTK, J LAAS_65_2015 against was passed. That apart, from a reading of the judgment in Sanjay Kumar Singh’s case referred to supra, no argument with reference to the power of the appellate Court under Order 41 Rule 27 (1) (aa) of CPC appears to have been addressed. 21) In Malayalam Plantations Ltd., the Hon’ble Supreme Court while setting aside the order of the High Court of Kerala, opined that when application for receipt of additional evidence under Order 41 Rule 27 of C.P.C., was filed, it was the duty of the High Court to deal with the same on merits. It also stated that under Oder 41 Rule 27, the additional evidence could be adduced in one of the three situations, viz., (a) whether the trial court has illegally refused the evidence although it ought to have been permitted (b) whether the evidence sought to be adduced by the party was not available to it despite the exercise of the due diligence; (c) whether the additional evidence was necessary in order to enable the appellate court to pronounce the judgment or any other substantial cause of similar nature. In Para No.17, the Hon’ble Apex Court held as follows: ―It is equally well settled that additional evidence cannot be permitted to be adduced so as to fill in the lacunae or to patch up the weak points in the case. Adducing additional evidence is in the interest of justice. Evidence relating to subsequent happenings or events which are relevant for disposal of the appeal, however, it is not open to any party, at the stage of appeal, to make fresh allegations and call upon the other side to admit or deny the same. Any such attempt is contrary to the requirements of Order 41 Rule 27 C.P.C. Additional evidence cannot be permitted at the appellate stage in order to enable other party to remove certain lacunae present in that case.‖ 46 NJS, J & GTK, J LAAS_65_2015 22) In Shalimar Chemical Works Ltd., referred to supra, the Hon’ble Supreme Court was dealing with an appeal against the judgment and order of the erstwhile High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Hyderabad, examining the matter with reference to Order 41 Rule 27(1)(b) of C.P.C., the Hon’ble Supreme Court set aside the order passed by the Division Bench. Be that as it may. 23) In State of Karnataka and Another v. K.C.Subramanya and Others4, the Hon’ble Supreme Court had an occasion to examine Order 41 Rule 27 (1) (aa) of CPC, in an appeal filed against the judgment of High Court of Karnataka. Referring to the said provision, the Hon’ble Supreme Court, dismissed the appeal inter alia holding as follows: ―4……… On perusal of this provision, it is unambiguously clear that the party can seek liberty to produce additional evidence at the appellate stage, but the same can be permitted only if the evidence sought to be produced could not be produced at the stage of trial in spite of exercise of due diligence and that the evidence could not be produced as it was not within his knowledge and hence was fit to be produced by the appellant before the appellate forum. 5. 5. It is thus clear that there are conditions precedent before allowing a party to adduce additional evidence at the stage of appeal, which specifically incorporates conditions to the effect that the party in spite of due diligence could not produce the evidence and the same cannot be allowed to be done at his leisure or sweet will. 6. In the instant matter, the appellants are a public authority and have sought to produce a road map which, it is unbelievable, was not within the knowledge of the appellants indicating a road to the disputed land. Therefore, 4 (2013) 13 SCC 468 47 NJS, J & GTK, J LAAS_65_2015 the rejection of the application of the appellants to rely on the said map has rightly not been entertained at the stage of first appeal. The impugned order thus does not suffer from legal infirmity so as to interfere with the same.‖ 24) In Kirpa Ram (deceased) Through Legal Representatives and Others5, a three Member Bench of the Hon’ble Supreme Court was dealing with an appeal against the concurrent findings in a suit for perpetual injunction. Referring to the facts of the case and disposal of appeal by the appellate Court without passing any order on the application filed under Order 41, Rule 27 of CPC, for permission to lead additional evidence, the Hon’ble Supreme Court opined that ―once the parties have understood the said controversy and had adduced evidence before the Trial Court, the appellant cannot be permitted to produce additional evidence in the first appeal.‖ 25) N.Kamalam (dead) and Another v. Ayyasamy & Another6 is a case wherein the appellant before the Hon’ble Supreme Court, suffered a decree in 1983, filed an appeal before the High Court in April, 1983. In the said appeal, an application for permission to adduce the additional evidence under Order 41 Rule 27 of CPC, was filed in August, 1993. The said application and the appeal were dismissed. The Hon’ble Supreme Court upheld the decision of the High Court inter alia opining that a plain reading of Order 41 Rule 27 would depict that rejection of the claim for production of evidence after a period of ten years from the date of filing of the appeal cannot be termed to be erroneous or an illegal exercise of discretion. In the said judgment, the 5 (2021) 13 SCC 57 6 2001 (5) Supreme 689 48 NJS, J & GTK, J LAAS_65_2015 Hon’ble Apex Court opined that the provisions of Order 41 Rule 27 of CPC, has not been engrafted in the Code so as to patch up the weak points in the case and to fill up the omissions in the Court of Appeal. It does not authorize any lacuna or gaps in evidence to be filled up. 26) In the light of the judgments referred to above, even if any such an application is filed, no relief can be granted unless the requirements are satisfied. 27) Even assuming that the material is required to enable the Court to render complete justice, at this length of time, in the considered opinion of this Court, no useful purpose would be served as the subject matter structures of the respondents / claimants were acquired pursuant to the Notification issued on 01.05.2007 i.e., more than 18 years ago. The Reference Court passed the order and decree under appeal on 22.09.2014, more than a decade ago. It is not known as to whether the officers who prepared the estimates on behalf of the Irrigation and Power Department are still in service and available for examination. The submission to remand the matter causes more injustice to the respondents / claimants, who lost their property and yet, not received the compensation. Be that as it may. After considering the submissions made by the learned Special Government Pleader for the appellant, this Court is of the considered opinion that the appellant had not made out a case for remand. Point No.2 is answered accordingly against the appellant. 49 NJS, J & GTK, J LAAS_65_2015 Point No.1 28) It is the contention of the learned Special Government Pleader that the compensation as enhanced by the Reference Court is without any valid basis and highly excessive. 29) To substantiate their claim for enhancement, the respondents as mentioned supra, examined P.Ws.1 to 3 and got marked Exs.A1-Abstract estimates and Ex.A2-Certified copy of the Judgment in L.A.O.P.No.891 of 1999 dated 25.02.2002. On behalf of the Referring Officer, R.W.1 i.e., the Special Collector was examined and Ex.B1-Award was got marked. 30) As per the judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court in Chimanlal Hargovinddas v. Spl.Land Acquisition Officer, Poona (1988 (3) SCC 751)], mere marking of Ex.B1-Award in the absence of oral and documentary evidence supporting the fixation of market value by the Land Acquisition Officer would not enure to the benefit of the State. Be that as it may. 31) It is trite Law that the claimant has to prove its claim and this Court in the absence of any evidence on behalf of the appellant, has no option except to look into the evidence adduced by the respondents / claimants. In support of the case of the respondents, claimant No.1 was examined as P.W.1. In his affidavit filed in lieu of chief examination, he stated that the LAO, failed to estimate the cost of material like wood, steel etc., and transportation charges for construction material, failed to take the assistance of R & B Engineers for preparing estimates. In cross examination, he denied that the durability of the wood is only 15 years and that the construction material like sand or steel are 50 NJS, J & GTK, J LAAS_65_2015 available in their village itself. He denied the suggestion that the construction material was not transported from a distant place of 70 Kms., from their village. He further denied the suggestion that Ex.A1 estimation was not correct. Nothing much was elicited in the cross examination of the said witness (P.W.1), except making the said suggestions. P.W.2., who was a licensed Civil Engineer in his chief affidavit stated that he prepared 347 estimations covering all varieties of constructions and that he visited the Gundavolu Village and found the value of the structures 2 to 3 times over and above the value fixed by the LAO and that he prepared the estimations basing on the SSR rates of 2007-2008. He also deposed that since 20 years he is doing estimations and constructions works to private persons as Licensed Civil Engineer. P.W.2 denied the suggestion that he was not competent to assess the value of the structures and that the estimations are not correct. Nothing was elicited in the cross examination of P.W.2, much less with regard to the correctness or otherwise of the estimates prepared by him. 32) P.W.3, who was a resident of neighbouring village i.e., Rekalagunta in his evidence stated that his lands and structures were acquired for the purpose of construction of Somasila Project under Teluguganga Project and as the compensation awarded was low, an application under Section 18 of the Act was filed and the learned Reference Court, after due examination of the matter, enhanced the market value by 100% in L.A.O.P.No.891 of 1999 (Ex.A2 dated 25.02.2002). Nothing much was elicited in the cross examination, even in respect of the said witness. 51 NJS, J & GTK, J LAAS_65_2015 33) Under the said circumstances, the contention that the order under appeal is without any valid basis, cannot be accepted. However, it is pertinent to note that the learned Reference Court while disposing of the O.P., enhanced the market value of the structures per sq. mtr., by 150% over and above the market value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, without assigning specific reasons. Even if the evidence of P.W.2 is taken into account, the value of the structures could be two to three times more over and above the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer. Therefore, in the considered opinion of this Court, the fixation of Market Value of the structures in terms of Ex.A2 i.e., 100% over and above the market value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer would be just and reasonable. Accordingly, the point No.1 is answered. 34) In the result, the appeal is allowed in part, by reducing the market value of the subject matter structures from 150% per sq. mtr., to 100% over and above the market value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer. Rest of the order under appeal stands confirmed. No costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications if any, pending shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA ____________________________ JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA Date: 22.12.2025 BLV 52 NJS, J & GTK, J LAAS_65_2015 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA LAAS No.65 of 2015 Date: 22.12.2025 BLV