HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU Case: SWP No. 1560/2011 Pawan Kumar and Ors. ..... Petitioner(s) Through :- None. Vs Commssr./Secy.Tech. Education and Ors. .....Respondent(s) Through :- None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE ORDER 04.02.2025 Record reveals that the instant petition has come up for hearing before this Court after 13 years and during this intervening period, there was no effort on part of the petitioner to get the instant petition listed. Even the writ petition with the efflux of time has been rendered infructuous, as the petitioner through the medium of the instant petition is seeking quashment of Advertisement Notice, which was issued way back on 31.01.2011 in which only notice was issued and no restraint order was issued by this Court. Even otherwise also, petitioners were engaged purely on temporary basis on academic arrangement on an honorarium of Rs. 4000/- per month, which arrangement does not vest in the petitioner a legally enforceable right to challenge the impugned advertisement notice. More particularly, when the engagement orders clearly stipulates that their arrangement shall cease as and when the regular arrangement is made in accordance with the rules. Thus, no prejudice has been caused to the petitioners in issuing the impugned advertisement notice. Sr. No. 29 2 | P a g e SWP No. 1560/2011 Today, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Accordingly, the writ petition, which has been rendered infructuous with efflux of time is dismissed for non-prosecution along with all connected application(s). Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated. (WASIM SADIQ NARGAL) JUDGE JAMMU 04.02.2025 Mihul