- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:26224 WP No. 20902 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV WRIT PETITION NO. 20902 OF 2025 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: 1. MRS. PREETHI SHENOY W/O MR. P LAXMAN SHENOY AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS RESIDING AT S-64 "SYMPHONY" HIS GRACE APARTMENT, PAIS LANE, 2ND CROSS, OPP. B.S.N.L. COLONY, LADYHILL, MANGALORE - 575 003 2. MR. P. LAXMAN SHENOY S/O T. VASUDEVE SHENOY AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS RESIDING AT S-64, "SYMPHONY" HIS GRACE APARTMENT, PAIS LANE, 2ND CROSS, OPP. B.S.N.L. COLONY, LADYHILL, MANGALORE - 575 003 … PETITIONERS (BY SRI. RAGHAVENDRA SHENOY M., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE AUTHORISED OFFICER UNION BANK OF INDIA M.G. ROAD BRANCH, Digitally signed by PRAKASH N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:26224 WP No. 20902 of 2025 MANGALORE CITY CORPORATION BUILDING, LALBAGH, MANGALORE - 575 003 REPRESENTED BY BRANCH MANAGER … RESPONDENT (BY SRI. SHIVASHANKARA, ADVOCATE FOR C/R IN CP NO.5746/2025 AND 11992/2025) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE SALE NOTICE DTD 21.06.2024 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT WHICH IS AT ANNEXURE-A AND ETC. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV ORAL ORDER Petitioner has challenged the sale notice at Annexure-A dated 21.06.2024. 2. Learned counsel for the respondent - Bank has filed a memo and submits that the sale notice has been withdrawn. 3. Memo filed by the learned counsel for respondent reads as hereunder: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:26224 WP No. 20902 of 2025 "The advocate for the Respondent Bank humbly submits that, the petitioner is challenging the sale notice dated 21.06.2025 issued by Respondent Bank. After issuance of the sale notice, the Respondent bank withdrawn the same accordingly said sale became infructuous. Hence, the advocate for the Respondent Bank prays that the Hon'ble court may be pleased to take on record same in the interest of justice and equity." 4. In light of the same, petition does not call for any further adjudication insofar as the sale notice. Needless to state the representation of the petitioner at Annexure-H may be considered by the Bank appropriately. All contentions are kept open. 5. Accordingly, petition is disposed off. Sd/- (S SUNIL DUTT YADAV) JUDGE VP