Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 5686 (CHH)

SUBHASH GURJAR v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

CRMP/286/2025 · 2025-01-24

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:4344 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 286 of 2025 Subhash Gurjar S/o Late Shyokaran Gurjar Aged About 36 Years R/o Village Manchi P.S. Harsora District - Alwar (Rajasthan) ... Applicant versus State Of Chhattisgarh Through Police Station Tikrapra District - Raipur (C.G.) ... Non-applicant For Applicant : None For Non-applicant : Mr. Amit Verma, Panel Lawyer. Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice Order on Board 24.01. 2025 1. This is an ofÏce reference. 2. This Court, vide order dated 23.07.2024, passed in MCRC No. 4623 of 2024, while allowing the bail to the applicant, namely, Subhash Gurjar had expressed its trust that the trial Court should make an earnest endeavor to conclude the trial expeditiously in accordance with law, preferably within a period of six months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order, if there was no legal impediment. 3. The learned Special Judge (NDPS Act), Raipur District-Raipur (C.G.) vide his request letter dated 14.01.2025 has requested for grant of KUNAL DEWANGAN Digitally signed by KUNAL DEWANGAN 2 some more time for concluding the trial. 4. It transpires from perusal of the PUD, that in this case, after the charges were framed, the accused has been absent since 07/08/2024, resulting in no witness statements being recorded. The accused is a resident of State of Rajasthan, making it difÏcult to serve the arrest warrant. Attempts have been made to arrest the accused at their residence but they are constantly absconded. Proceedings under Section 84 of the BNSS for proclamation and publication for his presence are pending. hence the conclusion of the trial is likely to take some time therefore, he prays for grant of further more time for concluding the same. 5. The request appears to be reasonable. The concerned trial Court is directed to conclude the trial as early as possible, preferably within a further period of four months from today. 6. Accordingly, this CRMP stands disposed off with the aforesaid direction. 7. Registry is directed to send a certified copy of this order to the trial Court concerned for necessary information and compliance. Sd/- (Ramesh Sinha) Chief Justice Kunal