RAVINDER PANDITA AND ORS. v. UOI.TH.MINISTRY OF INFORMATION AND ORS.
OWP/780/2016 · 2025-07-03
Moksha Khajuria Kazmi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 5684 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 5684 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
OWP 780/2016 c/w CPOWP 322/2018
Ravinder Pandita & Ors. .....Applicant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through :- Mr. A R Bhat, Advocate
v/s Union of India & Ors. .....Respondent(s)
Through :- None
CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE MOKSHA KHAJURIA KAZMI, JUDGE
ORDER 03.07.2025
Learned counsel for the petitioners states that he has no instructions in the instant petition, as such, he does not want to pursue the matter. His statement is taken on record. It appears that either the grievance of the petitioners stands redressed or the petitioners have lost interest in prosecuting the petition. In view of the submissions made referred to above, the instant petition is dismissed along with connected petition(s). Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated.
(MOKSHA KHAJURIA KAZMI) JUDGE
JAMMU 03.07.2025 AKHILESH Sr. No. 23