Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 5684 (AP)

KHAMBAMPATI VENKATA SATHYANARAYANA RAO v. THE STATE OF AP

WP/2937/2024 · 2025-03-11

Harinath N

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010554402024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] TUESDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NOs: 29014, 2937 & 3530/2024 WRIT PETITION NO: 29014/2024: Between: Sri Khambhampati Venkata Satyanarayana Rao ...PETITIONER AND The State Of Ap and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. KUNTAMUKKALA SAI SREE SANJAY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2. NARASIMHA RAO GUDISEVA WRIT PETITION NO: 2937/2024: Between: Khambampati Venkata Sathyanarayana Rao ...PETITIONER AND The State Of Ap and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 2 HN,J W.P.Nos.29014, 2937 & 3530 of 2024 1. KUNTAMUKKALA SAI SREE SANJAY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) 2. NARASIMHA RAO GUDISEVA WRIT PETITION NO: 3530/2024: Between: Gade Konda Reddy, ...PETITIONER AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. NARASIMHA RAO GUDISEVA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) 2. GP FOR REVENUE (AP) 3. KUNTAMUKKALA SAI SREE SANJAY 3 HN,J W.P.Nos.29014, 2937 & 3530 of 2024 The Court made the following Common Order: The W.P.Nos.29014 and 2937 of 2024 are filed by the petitioner seeking Police aid against the alleged interference of the 6th respondent with the property of the petitioner. 2. The W.P.No.3530 of 2024 is filed by the petitioner against the 6th respondent, who is the petitioner in W.P.Nos.29014 and 2937 of 2024. 3. The petitioners and the unofficial respondents have civil disputes between them and they have filed counter cases against each of them. The non-completion of investigation by the police and filing of charge sheet is challenged by the petitioner and the action of the Station House Officer in interfering with the civil disputes at the behest of the unofficial respondents is also challenged. 4. The learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing for the State upon instructions submits that the Police recorded the statements as many as 5 witnesses in Crime No.151 of 2024, as many as 8 witnesses in Crime No.150 of 2024 and as many as 10 witnesses in Crime No.40 of 2024 were examined. 5. It is also submitted by the learned Assistant Government Pleader that the Police have collected the CC TV footages of that area and investigation is under process. That apart, it is submitted that, both the parties, who are in 4 HN,J W.P.Nos.29014, 2937 & 3530 of 2024 dispute were bound over by proceedings before the Mandal Executive Magistrate, Reddygudem vide MC.No.40 of 2024 dated 02.02.2024. 6. The learned counsel for the petitioner in W.P.No.3530 of 2024 submits that the petitioner is the owner and he is in possession of the property and the proceedings were also challenged by him. 7. Considering the submissions of the learned Assistant Government Pleader that as the investigation is under way, these writ petitions are disposed off, directing the investigating Officer to expedite the investigation and file final report/charge sheet before the competent magistrate. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date: 11.03.2025 PGT