Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010007012025 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/248/2025 FAJLUL HOQUE S/O ABDUS SALAM SHEIKH, P/R/O VILL- MUSALMAN PARA, P.O.- GOLAKGANJ, PIN-783334, DIST- DHUBRI, ASSAM VERSUS THE UNION OF INDIA AND 6 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF ROAD, TRANSPORT AND HIGHWAY, TRANSPORT BHAWAN, 1, PARLIAMENT STREET, NEW DELHI-110001 2:THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM REVENUE AND DISASTER MANAGEMENT (LR) DEPARTMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI-781006 3:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER CUM COLLECTOR DHUBRI DIST- DHUBRI ASSAM PIN-783301 4:THE ADDITIONAL DEPUTY COMMISSIONER CUM COMPETENT AUTHORITY LAND ACQUISITION BRANCH DEPUTY COMMISSIONERS OFFICE DHUBRI DIST- DHUBRI ASSAM PIN-783301 Page No.# 2/3 5:THE CIRCLE OFFICER GOLAKGANJ REVENUE CIRCLE P.O. AND P.S.-GOLAKGANJ DIST- DHUBRI ASSAM PIN-783334 6:THE NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA (NHAI) (MINISTRY OF ROAD TRANSPORT AND HIGHWAY) GOVERNMENT OF INDIA A COMPANY HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT G-5 AND 6 SECTOR-10 DWARKA NEW DELHI-110075 AND REGIONAL OFFICE AT NEDFI HOUSE 4TH FLOOR G.S. ROAD DISPUR GUWAHATI-781006 ASSAM AND IS REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN 7:THE NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AND INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LIMITED (NHIDCL) HAVING ITS OFFICE AND PRINCIPAL PLACE OF BUSINESS AT 3RD FLOOR PTI BUILDING 4-PARLIAMENT STREET NEW DELHI-110001 AND HAVING ITS BRANCH OFFICE AT PMU (DHUBRI) G.T.B. ROAD OPPOSITE BHOOTNATH TEMPLE DHUBRI-783324 ASSAM AND IS REPRESENTED BY ITS GENERAL MANAGE Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. SURAJIT DAS, MR. A I ALI Advocate for the Respondent : DY.S.G.I., SC, NHIDC,GA, ASSAM BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY ORDER Date : 22-01-2025 Mr. A.I. Ali, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that certain annexures could not be annexed with the writ petition inadvertently at the time of filing. He has, thus, Page No.# 3/3 submitted that the petitioner may be allowed to withdraw this writ petition, with the liberty to file afresh. Ms. S. Konwar, learned State Counsel and Ms. R. Bora, learned Standing Counsel, NHIC for the respondents are present and have submitted that they have no objection to the prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioner. In view of the above submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition stands dismissed on withdrawal, with the liberty to file afresh. JUDGE Comparing Assistant