Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:90038 Court No. - 86 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 16004 of 2025 Applicant :- Vipin Singh Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Raj Raghuvanshi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Dr. Gautam Chowdhary,J. 1. Shri Vinay Srivastava, Advocate, has filed his vakalatnama on behalf of informant, which is taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State as well as learned counsel for the informant and perused the material brought on record. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the F.I.R. was lodged against the applicant and five other accused persons. The allegation against the applicant is that he introduced one accused namely Tarun Dudeja, who along with other accused persons defrauded the informant to the tune of 19.5 lakh rupees on the pretext of providing ATM machine and AEPS system without actually providing the same Learned counsel further submits that after thorough investigation charge sheet has been filed in the matter. Learned counsel further submits that general allegations have been made against the applicant and no specific allegation has been made against him. There is no direct transaction of money between the applicant the informant. There are two cases into the credit of applicant in which he is on bail. Several other submissions in order to demonstrate the falsity of the allegations made against the applicant have also been placed before the Court. The circumstances which, according to the counsel, led to the false implication of the accused have also been mentioned. It has also been assured on behalf of the applicant that he is ready to cooperate with the process of law and shall faithfully make himself available before the court whenever required and is also ready to accept all the conditions which the Court may deem fit to impose upon him. He next submits that the applicant is in jail since 03.01.2025. 4. Per contra, learned A.G.A. as well as learned counsel for the informant have opposed the prayer for bail of the applicant by contending that the innocence of the applicant cannot be adjudged at pre trial stage, therefore, he does not deserve any indulgence. 5. Considering the overall facts and circumstances, the nature of allegations, the gravity of offence and without expressing any opinion on merits, this Court finds it to be a fit case for bail. Accordingly, the bail application stands allowed. 6. Let the applicant-Vipin Singh, be enlarged on bail in Case Crime No. 345 of 2024, under Sections 420, 406, 467, 468, 471, 506 I.P.C., Police Station- Kotwali Nagar, District- Etah, on executing a personal bond and furnishing two local sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions: i) The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence. ii) The applicant shall not threaten or harass the prosecution witnesses. iii) The applicant shall appear on the date fixed by the trial court. iv) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which the applicant is accused, or suspected of the commission. v) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade such person from disclosing facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. 7. In case of default of any of the conditions enumerated above, the court concerned shall be at liberty to cancel the bail of applicant in accordance with law. Order Date :- 27.5.2025 Mustaqeem. Digitally signed by :- MOHD MUSTAQEEM KHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad