Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 56828 (AP)

P.Murthaiah v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/5445/2021 · 2025-10-07

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010093362021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY,THE EIGHTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 5445 OF 2021 Between: 1. P.Murthaiah, s/o P.V. Narayana, aged about 50 years, occ Service, r/o H.No. 43-243, Flat No. 202 Divya Apartments, N.R. Peta, Kurnool. ...Petitioner AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, , rep. by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Velagapudi, Amaravati. 2. The Commissioner of Police, Vijaywada, Krishna District 3. The Station House Officer, S 4. T Dileep Kumar, s/o not known, aged major r/o H.No. 22/86/2, Kotaiah Nagar, Kondapalli Vijayawada, Krishna District. ...Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: Y RATNA PRABHA Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondents:PADMANABHAM A The Court made the following order: THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 5445 of 2021 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…to issue an appropriate Writ, order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, to declare the inaction of the respondent No. 2 and 3 herein in taking action against the 4th respondent pursuant to the complaint dt. 16-4- 2018 given by the petitioner, followed by personal visits, as being illegal, arbitrary, unjust and unconstitutional and consequently direct the respondent No. 2 and 3 herein to forthwith act upon the complaint dt. 16-4-2018 and take action against the 4th respondent in accordance with Law” 2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petition may be disposed of, since the relief has become infructuous in this matter. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents is in attendance. 4. Recording the above said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 08.10.2025. Dvs HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.5445 of 2021 Dated.08.10.2025 Dvs 187