1 2025:CGHC:57161 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 6150 of 2025 1 - Ramashankar Yadav S/o Late Mahaveer Yadav, Aged About 35 Years R/o Ward No. 13, Ramanujganj, District Balrampur Ramanujganj (C.G.) ... Petitioner Versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Revenue Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Atal Nagar, P.O. And P.S. Naya Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Collector, Balrampur Ramanujganj (C.G.) 3 - Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue), Ramanujganj, District Balrampur Ramanujganj (C.G.) 4 - Tahsildar, Ramanujganj, District Balrampur Ramanujganj (C.G.) 5 - Amrendra Gupta, S/o Late Nandlal Gupta, Aged About 51 Years R/o Ward No. 09, Ramanujganj, Police Station And Tahsil Ramanujganj, District Balrampur Ramanujganj (C.G.) 6 - Arvind Gupta, S/o Late Nandlal Gupta, Aged About 45 Years R/o Ward No. 09, Ramanujganj, Police Station And Tahsil Ramanujganj, District Balrampur Ramanujganj (C.G.) 7 - Alok Gupta, S/o Late Nandlal Gupta, Aged About 41 Years R/o Ward No. 09, Ramanujganj, Police Station And Tahsil Ramanujganj, District Balrampur Ramanujganj (C.G.) 2 8 - Shravan Prajapti, S/o Sitaram Prajapati, Aged About 46 Years Ward No. 01, Ramanujganj, Police Station And Tahsil Ramanujganj, District Balrampur Ramanujganj (C.G.) ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. V.K. Pandey, Advocate For Respondents : Mr. Rishab Bisen, Panel Lawyer SB: Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge ORDER ON BOARD 25 /11/2025 1. The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking following reliefs:- “10.1 That, the Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue notices to the respondents returnable within early date of hearing. 10.2 That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the Respondent No. 3 decide the Revenue Case vide its Revenue Case No. 202412271300127/A-6A parties being Ramashankar Vs. Amrendra Gupta and others within stipulated period in accordance with law 10.3 That, grant any other relief(s)/order (s)/direction (s) in favour of petitioner, which deemed fit & proper in the facts & circumstances of the case, in the interest of justice.” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the proceedings on the application submitted by the petitioner before the Respondent No. 3/Sub- Divisional Officer (R) is pending since long and therefore, direction be issued to the Respondent No. 3/Sub-Divisional Officer (R) to conclude the proceedings at the earliest. 3. Learned counsel for the Respondents/State submits that pursuant to the application submitted by the petitioner, the Respondent No. 3 has called for the report from Respondent No. 4/Tehsildar. After receipt of the report, case was again taken up for hearing and accordingly, notice to the interested parties have been issued. He further submits that from the order-sheets, it is reflecting that the matter could not be concluded as the Presiding Officer was busy in other administrative work. 3 4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and also perused the documents placed on record. 5. On due consideration of the submission of counsel for the parties and also considering the documents enclosed along with the writ petition, this writ petition is disposed of, directing the Respondent No. 3/Sub-Divisional Officer (R) to consider and decide the pending proceedings subject matter of writ petition in accordance with law on its own merits expeditiously, preferably within a period of 03 months from the date of receipt of copy of the order. It is made clear that this Court has not made any observation on merits of the claim of petitioner and it is for the Respondent No. 3 to take decision on its own merits, in accordance with law. 6. With the aforesaid observation and directions, this writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge Dey SHUBHAM DEY Digitally signed by SHUBHAM DEY