N.Lakshmi Narayana v. Andhra Pragathi Grameena Bank
WP/17234/2014 · 2025-05-01
Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 56815 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 56815 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMA (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY ,THE SECOND DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 17234 OF 2014 Between: N.Lakshmi Narayana, S/o.Narayana Swamy, Aged about 55 years, Occ: Scale II Officer, Andhra Pragathi Grameena Bank, Kadapa District, R/o. D.No;28-2-42, Venkateswara Nagar, Ananthapur. ...PETITIONER AND
1. Andhra Pragathi Grameena Bank, Represented by its Chairman, Kadapa-516001. The Chairman, Personnel Department Andhra Pragathi Grameena Bank, Head office, Kadapa.-516001. The Chief Manager, Personnel Department, Andhra Pragathi Grameena Bank, Head office, Kadapa-516001. 2. 3. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction(s) more particularly, one in
the nature of Writ of Mandamus by declaring the entire action of the Respondent No: 3 herein in issuing the impugned Transfer Proceedings Vide Ref.No. 24/STF/451/TO/2014, dated 19.05.2014 against the Petitioner here in without any competency and contrary to the Andhra Pragati Grameena Bank (Officers' and Employees') Service Regulations 2010 as invalid, illegal, unsustainable and colorable exercise of power and set aside or quash the same and pass. I.A. NO: 1 OF 2014fWPI\/IP. NO: 21580 OF 2014) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings related to the impugned Transfer Proceedings Vide Ref.No. 24/STF/451/TO/2014, dated 19.05.2014 and direct the Respondent No: 2 herein to continue the Petitioner in the current working place and pass. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI. KRANTHI SRI VAKA Counsel for the Respondents: SRI K SRINIVASA MURTHY The Court made the following Order:
m - APHC010307112014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY. THE SECOND DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE [3330] PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 17234/2014 Between: N.Lakshmi Narayana ...PETITIONER AND Andhra Pragathi Grameena Bank and Others Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.KRANTHI SRI VAKA Counsel for the Respondent{S):
1.K SRINIVASA MURTHY ...RESPONDENT(S) The Court made the following:
2 the honourable SRI JUSTICE tarlada rajasekhar !^5ffilIPEI!I!O!lNOJ7234of2014 RAO QRD^: Despite the matter listed is no representation for the no interest in under the caption ‘for dismissal petitioner.
It evinces that the there petitioner has prosecuting his case. Therefore, the Writ Petition There shall be is dismissed for non-prosecution. no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous Petitions pending, if any shall stand closed. Sd/- K. SRINIVASA RAJU ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// iT' SECTION OFFICER To,
1. One CC to Sri. Kranthi Sri Vaka, Advocate [OPUC]
2. One CC to Sri. K Srinivasa Murthy, Advocate [OPUC]
3. Three CD Copies vna
HIGH COURT DATED;02/05/2025 ORDER y i 5 SEP 2025 VA nrt,! *s Tk WP.No.17234of 2014 iTCHE® DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION FOR NON PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS