JUTURU RAMA KRISHNA REDDY v. The State of Andhra Pradesh
WP/27043/2022 · 2025-11-06
Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 56809 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 56809 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010440832022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] FRIDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 27043/2022 Between:
1. JUTURU RAMA KRISHNA REDDY, S/O RAMIREDDY, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, RIO D.NO. 39/49-42, SRI KRISHNA DEVARAYA COLONY, CHINNA CHOWK ELAKA. KADAPA TOWN. KADAPA DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT .
2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KADAPA DISTRICT. KADAPA.
3. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KADAPA. KADAPA DISTRICT.
4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER INSPECTOR OF POLICE, RIMS POLICE STATION. YSR KADAPA DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. RAMESH VODNALA Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER:
This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for:
“.... to issue a Writ or Direction or an Order more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS to declare the inaction of the respondent No 2 to 4 in registering the FIR in respect of the complaint dated 09-05-2022 lodged by the petitioner against named accused in his complaint and not conducting investigation as illegal. arbitrary, unconstitutional, violative of principles of natural justice besides violative of Article 14, 21 and 300-A of the constitution of India and contrary to the provisions Cr.P.0 and consequently direct the respondent to register the complaint against the named accused in pursuance of the above complaint”
2
2. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner.
3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit that the subject matter is purely civil in nature.
4. Recording the said submission made by the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:07.11.2025 Asr
3
HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
W.P.No.27043 of 2022
Dt.07.11.2025
Asr